Pujols back, but 0-4

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • maverick99
    Pro
    • Jul 2003
    • 236

    #1

    Pujols back, but 0-4

    It is good to see him back, but his hitting streak will probably end. he is 0-4 in the bottom of the seventh
  • GCrusher23
    MVP
    • Dec 2002
    • 1170

    #2
    Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

    He probably should have sat out until he was 100% healthy. No need to play while sick because, unlike Bonds, Pujols team can't win with him or without him.

    Comment

    • GCrusher23
      MVP
      • Dec 2002
      • 1170

      #3
      Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

      He probably should have sat out until he was 100% healthy. No need to play while sick because, unlike Bonds, Pujols team can't win with him or without him.

      Comment

      • GCrusher23
        MVP
        • Dec 2002
        • 1170

        #4
        Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

        He probably should have sat out until he was 100% healthy. No need to play while sick because, unlike Bonds, Pujols team can't win with him or without him.

        Comment

        • MuffinMcFluffin
          Banned
          • Feb 2003
          • 4215

          #5
          Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

          But frankly, it's not their offense that's lacking... it's their pitchers getting injured constantly. I mean Matt Morris being gone for about 5 weeks is terrible for them. They got rid of Dustin Hermanson (sp?) and the Ginats picked them up... another emergency starter who is throwing today for SF. Their pitchers are injured or gone (Darryl Kile... I'm not bashing him), and they are similar to a Red Sox type tema right now.

          Comment

          • MuffinMcFluffin
            Banned
            • Feb 2003
            • 4215

            #6
            Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

            But frankly, it's not their offense that's lacking... it's their pitchers getting injured constantly. I mean Matt Morris being gone for about 5 weeks is terrible for them. They got rid of Dustin Hermanson (sp?) and the Ginats picked them up... another emergency starter who is throwing today for SF. Their pitchers are injured or gone (Darryl Kile... I'm not bashing him), and they are similar to a Red Sox type tema right now.

            Comment

            • MuffinMcFluffin
              Banned
              • Feb 2003
              • 4215

              #7
              Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

              But frankly, it's not their offense that's lacking... it's their pitchers getting injured constantly. I mean Matt Morris being gone for about 5 weeks is terrible for them. They got rid of Dustin Hermanson (sp?) and the Ginats picked them up... another emergency starter who is throwing today for SF. Their pitchers are injured or gone (Darryl Kile... I'm not bashing him), and they are similar to a Red Sox type tema right now.

              Comment

              • pol
                All Star
                • Nov 2002
                • 2424

                #8
                Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                MuffinMcFluffin said:
                But frankly, it's not their offense that's lacking... it's their pitchers getting injured constantly. I mean Matt Morris being gone for about 5 weeks is terrible for them. They got rid of Dustin Hermanson (sp?) and the Ginats picked them up... another emergency starter who is throwing today for SF. Their pitchers are injured or gone (Darryl Kile... I'm not bashing him), and they are similar to a Red Sox type tema right now.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                their offense is lacking.... in consistency.. they must be the most inconsistent offense in the league.

                Comment

                • pol
                  All Star
                  • Nov 2002
                  • 2424

                  #9
                  Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  MuffinMcFluffin said:
                  But frankly, it's not their offense that's lacking... it's their pitchers getting injured constantly. I mean Matt Morris being gone for about 5 weeks is terrible for them. They got rid of Dustin Hermanson (sp?) and the Ginats picked them up... another emergency starter who is throwing today for SF. Their pitchers are injured or gone (Darryl Kile... I'm not bashing him), and they are similar to a Red Sox type tema right now.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  their offense is lacking.... in consistency.. they must be the most inconsistent offense in the league.

                  Comment

                  • pol
                    All Star
                    • Nov 2002
                    • 2424

                    #10
                    Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    MuffinMcFluffin said:
                    But frankly, it's not their offense that's lacking... it's their pitchers getting injured constantly. I mean Matt Morris being gone for about 5 weeks is terrible for them. They got rid of Dustin Hermanson (sp?) and the Ginats picked them up... another emergency starter who is throwing today for SF. Their pitchers are injured or gone (Darryl Kile... I'm not bashing him), and they are similar to a Red Sox type tema right now.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    their offense is lacking.... in consistency.. they must be the most inconsistent offense in the league.

                    Comment

                    • 7Words
                      MVP
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 697

                      #11
                      Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                      this once again proves that 56 is pretty much unreachable

                      Comment

                      • 7Words
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 697

                        #12
                        Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                        this once again proves that 56 is pretty much unreachable

                        Comment

                        • 7Words
                          MVP
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 697

                          #13
                          Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                          this once again proves that 56 is pretty much unreachable

                          Comment

                          • MuffinMcFluffin
                            Banned
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 4215

                            #14
                            Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            7Words said:
                            this once again proves that 56 is pretty much unreachable

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            You got a point... I mean the only two guys that I truly believe has the potential to reach it later in their career are Melvin Mora and Jose Vidro.

                            Comment

                            • MuffinMcFluffin
                              Banned
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 4215

                              #15
                              Re: Pujols back, but 0-4

                              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                              7Words said:
                              this once again proves that 56 is pretty much unreachable

                              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                              You got a point... I mean the only two guys that I truly believe has the potential to reach it later in their career are Melvin Mora and Jose Vidro.

                              Comment

                              Working...