number of at bats question
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
-
-
Re: number of at bats question
It's 3.1 plate appearances per game for 162 games. If they said 3.1 at bats per game, Bonds wouldn't be qualified for an officially played year.Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
It's 3.1 plate appearances per game for 162 games. If they said 3.1 at bats per game, Bonds wouldn't be qualified for an officially played year.Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
It's 3.1 plate appearances per game for 162 games. If they said 3.1 at bats per game, Bonds wouldn't be qualified for an officially played year.Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
MSUSPartanPride said:
I wanna say 130, but am not positive.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I think it's 150 AB's. Or 50 days with the team.Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
MSUSPartanPride said:
I wanna say 130, but am not positive.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I think it's 150 AB's. Or 50 days with the team.Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
MSUSPartanPride said:
I wanna say 130, but am not positive.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I think it's 150 AB's. Or 50 days with the team.Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
Oh, experience? I was thinking you meant for award qualifications!Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
Oh, experience? I was thinking you meant for award qualifications!Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
Oh, experience? I was thinking you meant for award qualifications!Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
well, it's either lower than 147 at bats or lower than 49 games or both.
I'm asking cause I want to know how much over the limit hank blalock was last year. Cause if he'd been under the limit last year (which wouldn't have been too hard for the rangers to do) then he'd be the sure fire ROY this year.I'm sofa king, we Todd Ed.Comment
-
Re: number of at bats question
well, it's either lower than 147 at bats or lower than 49 games or both.
I'm asking cause I want to know how much over the limit hank blalock was last year. Cause if he'd been under the limit last year (which wouldn't have been too hard for the rangers to do) then he'd be the sure fire ROY this year.I'm sofa king, we Todd Ed.Comment
Comment