Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fsquid
    Banned
    • Jul 2002
    • 17635

    #136
    Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

    Will someone tell Wiggington that we want to trade him and he needs to tone it down some. Damn.

    Comment

    • jordan0386
      Banned
      • May 2003
      • 9235

      #137
      Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

      cameron homers again...door blown open...10-0


      if they hold...mets will be one out of first...and one game ahead of the fish...since they lost


      gotta love rain delays

      Comment

      • jordan0386
        Banned
        • May 2003
        • 9235

        #138
        Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

        cameron homers again...door blown open...10-0


        if they hold...mets will be one out of first...and one game ahead of the fish...since they lost


        gotta love rain delays

        Comment

        • jordan0386
          Banned
          • May 2003
          • 9235

          #139
          Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

          cameron homers again...door blown open...10-0


          if they hold...mets will be one out of first...and one game ahead of the fish...since they lost


          gotta love rain delays

          Comment

          • Spectre
            Th* ******
            • Mar 2003
            • 5853

            #140
            Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

            Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

            Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

            Comment

            • Spectre
              Th* ******
              • Mar 2003
              • 5853

              #141
              Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

              Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

              Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

              Comment

              • Spectre
                Th* ******
                • Mar 2003
                • 5853

                #142
                Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

                Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

                Comment

                • jordan0386
                  Banned
                  • May 2003
                  • 9235

                  #143
                  Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  Viper said:
                  Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

                  Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                  mets hit for the cycle in the 4th

                  Comment

                  • jordan0386
                    Banned
                    • May 2003
                    • 9235

                    #144
                    Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    Viper said:
                    Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

                    Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                    mets hit for the cycle in the 4th

                    Comment

                    • jordan0386
                      Banned
                      • May 2003
                      • 9235

                      #145
                      Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      Viper said:
                      Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

                      Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                      mets hit for the cycle in the 4th

                      Comment

                      • Programmed2Kill
                        Banned
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 14644

                        #146
                        Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Viper said:
                        Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

                        Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                        And guess what Wade will do.........absolutely nothing. He'll say the starting pitchers will get better in the second half.

                        Meanwhile, Millwood will get to 300 lbs., Myers will keep getting bombed...while Wolf and Milton keep winning. So basically, the pitching will be a roller coaster ride.

                        We keep the same hitters, nobody leading off plus no clutch hitters leads to continuing to do one run games an offense like this always jacking for HRs instead of getting on base means no offense alot of times...SAME PROBLEM FOR TWO YEARS NOW.

                        Comment

                        • Programmed2Kill
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 14644

                          #147
                          Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Viper said:
                          Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

                          Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                          And guess what Wade will do.........absolutely nothing. He'll say the starting pitchers will get better in the second half.

                          Meanwhile, Millwood will get to 300 lbs., Myers will keep getting bombed...while Wolf and Milton keep winning. So basically, the pitching will be a roller coaster ride.

                          We keep the same hitters, nobody leading off plus no clutch hitters leads to continuing to do one run games an offense like this always jacking for HRs instead of getting on base means no offense alot of times...SAME PROBLEM FOR TWO YEARS NOW.

                          Comment

                          • Programmed2Kill
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 14644

                            #148
                            Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Viper said:
                            Wow we are beating the snot out of the Phillies. I can't remember the last time we had 14 hits on a pitching staff by the 5th inning!

                            Anyway, Philly's pitching is mediocre at best. Sure they looked good on paper, but Ed Wade has got some work to do...

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                            And guess what Wade will do.........absolutely nothing. He'll say the starting pitchers will get better in the second half.

                            Meanwhile, Millwood will get to 300 lbs., Myers will keep getting bombed...while Wolf and Milton keep winning. So basically, the pitching will be a roller coaster ride.

                            We keep the same hitters, nobody leading off plus no clutch hitters leads to continuing to do one run games an offense like this always jacking for HRs instead of getting on base means no offense alot of times...SAME PROBLEM FOR TWO YEARS NOW.

                            Comment

                            • EWRMETS
                              All Star
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 7491

                              #149
                              Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                              Why don't you just get rid of the worst manager of all time

                              Comment

                              • EWRMETS
                                All Star
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 7491

                                #150
                                Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

                                Why don't you just get rid of the worst manager of all time

                                Comment

                                Working...