Bonds randomly tested for roids

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stAte
    Pro
    • Feb 2004
    • 591

    #1

    Bonds randomly tested for roids

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1889466

    "The results aren't made public unless a player tests positive twice. A first positive test results in treatment, while a second positive result would lead to a fine or suspension, and the player's name would be made public."
    FAN OF: Georgetown Hoyas, DC United, Cincinnati Bengals, St. Louis Cardinals, West Ham United, Arkansas State Indians, and Memphis Grizzlies
  • Blzer
    Resident film pundit
    • Mar 2004
    • 42520

    #2
    Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

    And if negative the first time? Does it clear his name?
    Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

    Comment

    • Blzer
      Resident film pundit
      • Mar 2004
      • 42520

      #3
      Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

      And if negative the first time? Does it clear his name?
      Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

      Comment

      • soxboy7
        MVP
        • Aug 2002
        • 1541

        #4
        Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

        Originally posted by Blzer
        And if negative the first time? Does it clear his name?
        People would still have there doubts about it. I know I would

        Comment

        • soxboy7
          MVP
          • Aug 2002
          • 1541

          #5
          Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

          Originally posted by Blzer
          And if negative the first time? Does it clear his name?
          People would still have there doubts about it. I know I would

          Comment

          • rsox
            All Star
            • Feb 2003
            • 6309

            #6
            Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

            Bud Selig would have to think long and hard about releasing the results one way or another, think about it: if the results come up positive and it turns out to be a second offense would Selig make it public and have to suspend Bonds as he is closing in on Hank Aaron?, i doubt it. Baseball needs Bonds to break Aarons Home Run record, the closer he gets, the more national attention it will give Baseball, and they need him to do it without having the record tainted by steroids. so i think the results will come up "negative" no matter what.

            Comment

            • rsox
              All Star
              • Feb 2003
              • 6309

              #7
              Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

              Bud Selig would have to think long and hard about releasing the results one way or another, think about it: if the results come up positive and it turns out to be a second offense would Selig make it public and have to suspend Bonds as he is closing in on Hank Aaron?, i doubt it. Baseball needs Bonds to break Aarons Home Run record, the closer he gets, the more national attention it will give Baseball, and they need him to do it without having the record tainted by steroids. so i think the results will come up "negative" no matter what.

              Comment

              • Blzer
                Resident film pundit
                • Mar 2004
                • 42520

                #8
                Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

                Originally posted by soxboy7
                People would still have there doubts about it. I know I would
                No, I mean do they make an announcement?
                Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

                Comment

                • Blzer
                  Resident film pundit
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 42520

                  #9
                  Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

                  Originally posted by soxboy7
                  People would still have there doubts about it. I know I would
                  No, I mean do they make an announcement?
                  Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

                  Comment

                  • mjb2124
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 13649

                    #10
                    Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

                    Originally posted by Blzer
                    No, I mean do they make an announcement?
                    No they don't.

                    The problem with this is that Steriods are cycled. During an off cycle, there's not a trace of them. My guess is that if he was ever on Steroids (or HGH which is probably more likely) he's off them now. I'd think in a long season like baseball, the wear and tear of roids on a person's ligaments would be problematic later in the season. A good test would be in the offseason IMO.

                    I also don't know if this test, tests HGH. I think it's more likely Barry is on that than steroids.

                    Comment

                    • mjb2124
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 13649

                      #11
                      Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

                      Originally posted by Blzer
                      No, I mean do they make an announcement?
                      No they don't.

                      The problem with this is that Steriods are cycled. During an off cycle, there's not a trace of them. My guess is that if he was ever on Steroids (or HGH which is probably more likely) he's off them now. I'd think in a long season like baseball, the wear and tear of roids on a person's ligaments would be problematic later in the season. A good test would be in the offseason IMO.

                      I also don't know if this test, tests HGH. I think it's more likely Barry is on that than steroids.

                      Comment

                      • stAte
                        Pro
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 591

                        #12
                        Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

                        I don't think it clears his name but it does suggest the chance that people may be incorrect about him. A positive test should automatically be announced unlike the MLB policy. I think everyone should know if someone is cheating. Also, the policy should be stricter than it is.
                        FAN OF: Georgetown Hoyas, DC United, Cincinnati Bengals, St. Louis Cardinals, West Ham United, Arkansas State Indians, and Memphis Grizzlies

                        Comment

                        • stAte
                          Pro
                          • Feb 2004
                          • 591

                          #13
                          Re: Bonds randomly tested for roids

                          I don't think it clears his name but it does suggest the chance that people may be incorrect about him. A positive test should automatically be announced unlike the MLB policy. I think everyone should know if someone is cheating. Also, the policy should be stricter than it is.
                          FAN OF: Georgetown Hoyas, DC United, Cincinnati Bengals, St. Louis Cardinals, West Ham United, Arkansas State Indians, and Memphis Grizzlies

                          Comment

                          Working...