But, yeah, he'd still be good for .300/30/100 a year on the road, which still equates to a damn good ballplayer, in my book.
Todd Helton on roids? I don't think so
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Todd Helton on roids? I don't think so
Originally posted by Rag3vsW0rld
But, yeah, he'd still be good for .300/30/100 a year on the road, which still equates to a damn good ballplayer, in my book. -
Re: Todd Helton on roids? I don't think so
Originally posted by Rag3vsW0rldYeah, it's just Coors Field (looking at his career splits). Those numbers will still be good though.
But, yeah, he'd still be good for .300/30/100 a year on the road, which still equates to a damn good ballplayer, in my book.Comment
-
Re: Todd Helton on roids? I don't think so
Originally posted by RattDaddeeYeah, his BA is what is really jacked up at home (.377 to .298). And he homers about once more every seven ABs at Coors. Oddly enough, he Ks at a much higher frequency on the road (8.7 K/AB at home, 6.5 away).
But, yeah, he'd still be good for .300/30/100 a year on the road, which still equates to a damn good ballplayer, in my book.Comment
-
Re: Todd Helton on roids? I don't think so
Originally posted by RattDaddeeYeah, his BA is what is really jacked up at home (.377 to .298). And he homers about once more every seven ABs at Coors. Oddly enough, he Ks at a much higher frequency on the road (8.7 K/AB at home, 6.5 away).
But, yeah, he'd still be good for .300/30/100 a year on the road, which still equates to a damn good ballplayer, in my book.Comment
Comment