Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigTigLSU
    H*p H*p 4 H*rs*m*n
    • Sep 2002
    • 6506

    #1

    Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

    If the game was a 2 point game would they have still have called it a 3 on replay with shot ruled a three during the game.

    I actually think that the amount time they took to look at the shot it would have stayed a 3 and Kentucky would have gotten a W, but I could see the want for them to let the game be decided on the court calling it a 2 and Letting it go to OT but why take that long to look at it if you are just let the game go on.

    Your thoughts
    RIP Drucilla S Thomas 1952-2008 "Love You Momma"
    www.grownmansports.com
    Facebook.com/grownmansports
  • Vince
    Bow for Bau
    • Aug 2002
    • 26017

    #2
    Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

    It was clearly a 3.Shame on them(the refs) if they would have actually done what you said.It was blatantly obvious
    @ me or dap me

    http://twitter.com/52isthemike

    Comment

    • Vince
      Bow for Bau
      • Aug 2002
      • 26017

      #3
      Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

      It was clearly a 3.Shame on them(the refs) if they would have actually done what you said.It was blatantly obvious
      @ me or dap me

      http://twitter.com/52isthemike

      Comment

      • fsquid
        Banned
        • Jul 2002
        • 17635

        #4
        Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

        if they called it a 2 on the floor, I think it would have stayed a 2. None of the replays were clear to me either way.

        Comment

        • fsquid
          Banned
          • Jul 2002
          • 17635

          #5
          Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

          if they called it a 2 on the floor, I think it would have stayed a 2. None of the replays were clear to me either way.

          Comment

          • Shaver
            Legend
            • Jul 2002
            • 10148

            #6
            Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

            How can you say it was "CLEARLY" a 3???

            If it was CLEARLY a 3 they wouldn't have reviewed it.

            I think it was the right call, because there was indisputable evidence to overturn it, but unless the REFs had a better angle in replay than CBS did, it was not CLEARLY anything.
            Listen to The Remodeling Clay Podcast!

            Check out my BLOG - Remodeling Clay

            Follow me on Twitter: @RemodelingClay

            Comment

            • Shaver
              Legend
              • Jul 2002
              • 10148

              #7
              Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

              How can you say it was "CLEARLY" a 3???

              If it was CLEARLY a 3 they wouldn't have reviewed it.

              I think it was the right call, because there was indisputable evidence to overturn it, but unless the REFs had a better angle in replay than CBS did, it was not CLEARLY anything.
              Listen to The Remodeling Clay Podcast!

              Check out my BLOG - Remodeling Clay

              Follow me on Twitter: @RemodelingClay

              Comment

              • mgoblue
                Go Wings!
                • Jul 2002
                • 25477

                #8
                Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                Originally posted by Clay_OS
                How can you say it was "CLEARLY" a 3???

                If it was CLEARLY a 3 they wouldn't have reviewed it.

                I think it was the right call, because there was indisputable evidence to overturn it, but unless the REFs had a better angle in replay than CBS did, it was not CLEARLY anything.
                exactly...I'm just glad they took the time to get it right, as opposed to that horrendous Villanova called "travel" that was nowhere near a travel.
                Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-7009-7102-8818

                Comment

                • mgoblue
                  Go Wings!
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 25477

                  #9
                  Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                  Originally posted by Clay_OS
                  How can you say it was "CLEARLY" a 3???

                  If it was CLEARLY a 3 they wouldn't have reviewed it.

                  I think it was the right call, because there was indisputable evidence to overturn it, but unless the REFs had a better angle in replay than CBS did, it was not CLEARLY anything.
                  exactly...I'm just glad they took the time to get it right, as opposed to that horrendous Villanova called "travel" that was nowhere near a travel.
                  Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-7009-7102-8818

                  Comment

                  • Vince
                    Bow for Bau
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 26017

                    #10
                    Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                    I thought his foot was behind the line.When they zoomed it in,it looked to me that he was just behind it,barely.
                    @ me or dap me

                    http://twitter.com/52isthemike

                    Comment

                    • Vince
                      Bow for Bau
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 26017

                      #11
                      Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                      I thought his foot was behind the line.When they zoomed it in,it looked to me that he was just behind it,barely.
                      @ me or dap me

                      http://twitter.com/52isthemike

                      Comment

                      • glucklich
                        Banned
                        • Jun 2004
                        • 4272

                        #12
                        Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                        I think the ref might have been more apt to call it a two on the floor. As others have said, this is what mattered more than the replay since it was inconclusive. Also, this might be something that varies a lot with different crews...some might not want to intervene by deciding it themselves when it could go to overtime...others are more staunchly about stepping up to make the call. I heard this segment this morning as well, and I also agree that its bad form to not call something what it is so that it may be decided in overtime. But that applies really when something is more clear cut.

                        Comment

                        • glucklich
                          Banned
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 4272

                          #13
                          Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                          I think the ref might have been more apt to call it a two on the floor. As others have said, this is what mattered more than the replay since it was inconclusive. Also, this might be something that varies a lot with different crews...some might not want to intervene by deciding it themselves when it could go to overtime...others are more staunchly about stepping up to make the call. I heard this segment this morning as well, and I also agree that its bad form to not call something what it is so that it may be decided in overtime. But that applies really when something is more clear cut.

                          Comment

                          • PdiddyPop
                            K*ngs *f th* D*nc*!
                            • Dec 2002
                            • 21768

                            #14
                            Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                            What really should be pointed out was Sparks was fouled on that shot as well.
                            President of the Devils Den
                            (2009 Pre-Season NIT Champs/2010 ACC Co Reg Season/ACC Tournament/South Regional Champs/National Champs)

                            Comment

                            • PdiddyPop
                              K*ngs *f th* D*nc*!
                              • Dec 2002
                              • 21768

                              #15
                              Re: Mike and Mike in Morning question on the MSU and Kentucky game

                              What really should be pointed out was Sparks was fouled on that shot as well.
                              President of the Devils Den
                              (2009 Pre-Season NIT Champs/2010 ACC Co Reg Season/ACC Tournament/South Regional Champs/National Champs)

                              Comment

                              Working...