NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thedream2k13
    MVP
    • Jan 2013
    • 1507

    #91
    Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

    Originally posted by Andarus
    Who cares about Ratings, I will use my own Ratings. I will give Duncan around ~82/83, DWade around 77/78 and Kobe 79/80 and definitly nerf Harden/Howard and give Rose 0 Durabilty.
    You gonna have horrible rosters with all the excessive ratings decreases
    #SIMNATION

    fighting for truth, justice and SIMULATION gameplay

    Comment

    • Sundown
      MVP
      • Oct 2010
      • 3270

      #92
      Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

      Originally posted by Pizarro24
      It´s not only PER and WS.
      I don´t know how familiar you are with stats like RAPM (Regularized Adjusted Plus Minus) or SPM (Statistical Plus Minus), but Manu is always high in those stats too (as is Duncan).

      And when you read all those stats correctly it simply means one thing:
      the Spurs are a better team wirh Duncan and/or Ginobili on the court.

      So I think Manu is very underrated by many people, as is the impact that Duncan still has on the Spurs.
      I definitely like RAPM better than PER. Only thing is it's rather noisy and is also a better measure of how a player is performing in his role than individual performance in all contexts. While it seeks to filter out the influence of other players on raw +/-, it doesn't filter out how those other players affect a player's own performance. That's an even bigger issue when a player mainly shares minutes with certain other players.

      It's definitely a good stat for spotting things missed by the eye test or raw stats though-- a high RAPM suggests a player is doing something very right despite stat lines (Iggy is the textbook example here) and should be a clue when building rosters.

      Comment

      • ojandpizza
        Hall Of Fame
        • Apr 2011
        • 29807

        #93
        NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

        Originally posted by Pizarro24
        It´s not only PER and WS.

        I don´t know how familiar you are with stats like RAPM (Regularized Adjusted Plus Minus) or SPM (Statistical Plus Minus), but Manu is always high in those stats too (as is Duncan).



        And when you read all those stats correctly it simply means one thing:

        the Spurs are a better team wirh Duncan and/or Ginobili on the court.



        So I think Manu is very underrated by many people, as is the impact that Duncan still has on the Spurs.

        These stats mean little to nothing when you are only playing 20 minutes per game and scoring 12 points..

        He's still a very talented player, any basketball fan obviously knows that, but he's no longer giving all star production or value, plain and simple.

        Edit: obviously he has a huge impact for the Spurs, but would he have that same impact elsewhere? Being valuable to one team doesn't equate to being and All-Star caliber player league wide.. Remember Diaw also played a huge role for the team, as well as Green.

        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • Pizarro24
          Rookie
          • Jan 2012
          • 272

          #94
          Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

          Originally posted by Sundown
          I definitely like RAPM better than PER. Only thing is it's rather noisy and is also a better measure of how a player is performing in his role than individual performance in all contexts. While it seeks to filter out the influence of other players on raw +/-, it doesn't filter out how those other players affect a player's own performance. That's an even bigger issue when a player mainly shares minutes with certain other players.

          It's definitely a good stat for spotting things missed by the eye test or raw stats though-- a high RAPM suggests a player is doing something very right despite stat lines (Iggy is the textbook example here) and should be a clue when building rosters.
          You sir are absolutely right.
          Of course, there isn´t a "perfect" stat out there, the one that show us how to rank the players.
          But there are a few good out there (PER, WS, RAPM, SPM and all those other advanced stats) and if a player is decent or good at everyone of these, I think this shows that he is a good player.

          Originally posted by ojandpizza
          These stats mean little to nothing when you are only playing 20 minutes per game and scoring 12 points..

          He's still a very talented player, any basketball fan obviously knows that, but he's no longer giving all star production or value, plain and simple.

          Edit: obviously he has a huge impact for the Spurs, but would he have that same impact elsewhere? Being valuable to one team doesn't equate to being and All-Star caliber player league wide.. Remember Diaw also played a huge role for the team, as well as Green.

          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          Nobody said Manu is an all-star or something like that.
          But fact is, his impact on the Spurs is huge, when you consider all those stats it seems he is one of the two best players on the Spurs roster (with Duncan being the other one).

          And that´s what Basketball is all about in my opinion, you have to help your team to win games and that´s what Ginobili does.


          EDIT:
          Originally posted by ojandpizza
          Edit: obviously he has a huge impact for the Spurs, but would he have that same impact elsewhere? Being valuable to one team doesn't equate to being and All-Star caliber player league wide.. Remember Diaw also played a huge role for the team, as well as Green.

          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          There was a discussion in another thread, where users said they would love that a player rating depends on the team, the coach and the system he is playing for.
          I think something like that is very hard to programme in a videogame.

          As far as Ginobili goes: yes, I think he would be very productive on any team, because he´s a smart player with great skills.
          Last edited by Pizarro24; 09-11-2014, 09:27 AM.
          Don´t play video games, play Basketball

          Comment

          • Real2KInsider
            MVP
            • Dec 2003
            • 4658

            #95
            Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

            Originally posted by dmann1oo
            Operation sports needs to drug test you before you reply to a post cause your on something
            If people wonder why I used to be a vicious A-hole around here...
            NBA 2K25 Roster: Real 2K Rosters - Modern Era
            PSN: Real2kinsider
            http://patreon.com/real2krosters
            http://twitter.com/real2kinsider
            http://youtube.com/real2krosters

            Comment

            • dfghsty
              Just started!
              • Sep 2014
              • 4

              #96
              Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

              Don't flame me spurs fans lol, but Tim Duncan is not the 4th best all around player in the league.

              Comment

              • ffaacc03
                MVP
                • Oct 2008
                • 3487

                #97
                Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                Overall rating is no longer about ranking the players by their overall contribution but more so by a specific role (defense, rebounding, outside shooting, etc) ... plus, we dont know the full extend of the new ratings and tendencies that were introduced nor their impact within each role.

                Now, what I would love to know is how do some of the leaked new ratings and tendencies translate into gameplay and simmed stats ...

                Comment

                • ojandpizza
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 29807

                  #98
                  Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                  Originally posted by Pizarro24
                  You sir are absolutely right.

                  Of course, there isn´t a "perfect" stat out there, the one that show us how to rank the players.

                  But there are a few good out there (PER, WS, RAPM, SPM and all those other advanced stats) and if a player is decent or good at everyone of these, I think this shows that he is a good player.







                  Nobody said Manu is an all-star or something like that.

                  But fact is, his impact on the Spurs is huge, when you consider all those stats it seems he is one of the two best players on the Spurs roster (with Duncan being the other one).



                  And that´s what Basketball is all about in my opinion, you have to help your team to win games and that´s what Ginobili does.

                  One of the two best players.. So where does that leave Parker and Kawhi?

                  I guess those advanced stats don't show all value considering Kawhi was the finals MVP, he was the one defending the best player alive, etc.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • turty11
                    All Star
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 8923

                    #99
                    Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                    yall on some stuff lol.. this thread is mad rofl.


                    im a fan of stats..big time..but i do like my eye tests. i dont have 20/20 for nothing.

                    ginobli is a slighlty above average player at this stage of his career. (at best he is the 4th best player on his team.)

                    turnobli for a reason bruh
                    NBA 2k19 Roster and Draft project for PS4

                    Comment

                    • eko718
                      MVP
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 2257

                      #100
                      Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                      This is not on topic with the SPURS, but it is regarding ratings. The Cavaliers are the #2 rated team overall, 1st in offense and 4th in defense. I see a serious issue with this. Something is very wrong with their individual defensive ratings if this, one of the worst defensive teams in the league last year, can catapult to 4th in this game via the additions of Lebron and Marion(because Love certainly DETRACTS from that equation).

                      Kyrie and Waiters are poor on-ball defenders, Varajeo, Love and Thompson are respectively amongst the worst rim protecting big men in the NBA. Does the team defense rating include rebounding? That's the only reasonable explanation I can see here. 2K needs to expand team ratings like they expanded individual ratings.

                      The Spurs, OKC, Memphis, Bulls, Indiana, Charlotte, Miami, Toronto and Washington are all known as defensive teams (Miami even before Lebron, and Indiana though w/out PG has a defensive identity). Cleveland doesn't even have an identity yet and they are amongst the top in the league in both offense and defense... this will be the first thing I thoroughly examine.

                      Comment

                      • Real2KInsider
                        MVP
                        • Dec 2003
                        • 4658

                        #101
                        Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                        Originally posted by turty11
                        ginobli is a slighlty above average player at this stage of his career. (at best he is the 4th best player on his team.)
                        That doesn't mean he isn't a top SG in the league.
                        He's the 4th best player on the Spurs and would be the 2nd best player on many others.
                        NBA 2K25 Roster: Real 2K Rosters - Modern Era
                        PSN: Real2kinsider
                        http://patreon.com/real2krosters
                        http://twitter.com/real2kinsider
                        http://youtube.com/real2krosters

                        Comment

                        • turty11
                          All Star
                          • Apr 2013
                          • 8923

                          #102
                          Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                          Originally posted by Rashidi
                          That doesn't mean he isn't a top SG in the league.
                          He's the 4th best player on the Spurs and would be the 2nd best player on many others.

                          just off the top of my head i can name 8 guys better than him but i aint bout to have this convo with you and get banned.


                          @eko, that 4th in defense for cavs scares the living crap out of me
                          NBA 2k19 Roster and Draft project for PS4

                          Comment

                          • stillfeelme
                            MVP
                            • Aug 2010
                            • 2407

                            #103
                            Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                            Originally posted by eko718
                            This is not on topic with the SPURS, but it is regarding ratings. The Cavaliers are the #2 rated team overall, 1st in offense and 4th in defense. I see a serious issue with this. Something is very wrong with their individual defensive ratings if this, one of the worst defensive teams in the league last year, can catapult to 4th in this game via the additions of Lebron and Marion(because Love certainly DETRACTS from that equation).

                            Kyrie and Waiters are poor on-ball defenders, Varajeo, Love and Thompson are respectively amongst the worst rim protecting big men in the NBA. Does the team defense rating include rebounding? That's the only reasonable explanation I can see here. 2K needs to expand team ratings like they expanded individual ratings.

                            The Spurs, OKC, Memphis, Bulls, Indiana, Charlotte, Miami, Toronto and Washington are all known as defensive teams (Miami even before Lebron, and Indiana though w/out PG has a defensive identity). Cleveland doesn't even have an identity yet and they are amongst the top in the league in both offense and defense... this will be the first thing I thoroughly examine.
                            You would be surprised at what the coach rating can do to swing the overall team ranking.

                            I never knew what it meant to overall ratings or actual gameplay. I actually thought it only played a role to make sure when you sim games the right highly ranked team gets the better record. The team overall ranking is a black box like the individual overall rating that they never really explained.

                            Example the last time when the Sixers went to the playoffs they were winning games. They changed Doug Collins coaching rating for offense or defense and they went up without touching any player stats.

                            Comment

                            • ojandpizza
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 29807

                              #104
                              Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                              Originally posted by eko718
                              This is not on topic with the SPURS, but it is regarding ratings. The Cavaliers are the #2 rated team overall, 1st in offense and 4th in defense. I see a serious issue with this. Something is very wrong with their individual defensive ratings if this, one of the worst defensive teams in the league last year, can catapult to 4th in this game via the additions of Lebron and Marion(because Love certainly DETRACTS from that equation).

                              Kyrie and Waiters are poor on-ball defenders, Varajeo, Love and Thompson are respectively amongst the worst rim protecting big men in the NBA. Does the team defense rating include rebounding? That's the only reasonable explanation I can see here. 2K needs to expand team ratings like they expanded individual ratings.

                              The Spurs, OKC, Memphis, Bulls, Indiana, Charlotte, Miami, Toronto and Washington are all known as defensive teams (Miami even before Lebron, and Indiana though w/out PG has a defensive identity). Cleveland doesn't even have an identity yet and they are amongst the top in the league in both offense and defense... this will be the first thing I thoroughly examine.

                              I'm with you I could see it being a problem, until we actually see them play anyways.. On paper they don't appear to be a top for 4..

                              But, Love definitely doesn't "detract" from last years defense, because they didn't give up anything from last years core to get him.


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                              Comment

                              • Real2KInsider
                                MVP
                                • Dec 2003
                                • 4658

                                #105
                                Re: NBA 2K15 - Spurs Ratings

                                Originally posted by turty11
                                just off the top of my head i can name 8 guys better than him but i aint bout to have this convo with you and get banned.
                                ....Right.
                                NBA 2K25 Roster: Real 2K Rosters - Modern Era
                                PSN: Real2kinsider
                                http://patreon.com/real2krosters
                                http://twitter.com/real2kinsider
                                http://youtube.com/real2krosters

                                Comment

                                Working...