My point with Paul and teodosic was that they are playmakers. Cementing my point about playmakers not dunking.
But, let's move to the fact that you picked stuff from my post, used it out of context to suit your narrative, and make a different point unrelated to the example I use it for. That's what I mean. Your shifting narrative and rearranging points. That's nonsensical.
Look at what that was. My point: These guards are playmakers, they don't dunk. Pure playmakers shouldn't dunk.
You're counter argument: They aren't Slashers though.
....THAT'S IRRELEVANT TO THE POINT.
I'm aggressive because you aren't here to actually argue or debate. You're doing the same thing politicians do when they can't argue the point, which is change the narrative entirely.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Comment