Re: 2019 Realistic Draft Class (Xbox one)
Responses in RED. Thanks for the feedback.
As I already said this class is amazing. The only things I disagree with are some of the ratings and positions:
1. Culver is probably going top 5 and has shown that he is one of the most versatile and NBA ready players in the class. He has a great all around game, good playmaking and passing ability and projects as a solid defender.
Culver has come on as of late, I need to revisit his ratings
2. Little has been terrible so far. He has low IQ, can't do much on offense and didn't look as athletic as he was expected to be. Overall probably the biggest dissapointment of the class (with Grimes) and will probably drop out of the top 10, if not further.
No way Little drops out of top 10 based on potential alone.
Roy Willliams's system not doing him any favors as well. Will look at his ratings
3. I don't see Zion having MVP potential. He has a really high floor but not a ceiling as high as 95. I should say that those things are hard to predict but it seems like he has some limits both on offense and defense. For example he is just not as good of a project as Doncic is (and was expected to be), and Luka has 93 potential. Simmons has 92 and he's better prospect as well, he als was better when entering the league.
This is where I disagree. "IF" and it is a big if Williamson develops a consistent shot his ceiling is through the roof. I think Doncic will not see a huge improvement for next year as he was better coming out than people gave him credit for (ie. ready to play)
4. Langford has looked pretty good on defense lately, thanks to his size he projects as a good defender at the NBA level.
Will revist Langford. So up and down, hard to get a read on.
Some people are high, I just don't see it
5. Doumbouya, Hoard and Okpala will probably play as PF.
Hoard I haven't fully done, but don't see Okpala at PF.
I think he is more of Ingram type - attacking the basket. (could be wrong)
6. Bitadze looked a ton better than Bassey, who didn't have a good season at all. I wouldn't rate them both at 70 as Bitadze could probably be selected in the lottery and Bassey might not even get drafted. I know people really liked Bassey at the start of the year but he really proved them wrong lol.
Bitzdze is by far the better player right now, but doesn't fit in today's NBA. Bassey, while a disappointment, has potential. Faster, can move his feet, developing jumpshot. Will look at
7. Hayes should be a low rating/high potential type of pick. He has shown flashes but still looks very raw.
Again hard to mix overall with potential and get CPU to draft high.
8. I would give Porter Jr a higher potential. Probably one of the highest in the class, although he could be a bust given his poor attitude on and off the floor.
totally agree. Biggest boom vs bust potential. Personally I think bust, but very talented kid
9. King and Washington (him in particular) have first round talent.
Personally King I don't see, Washington maybe. Undersized and a tweener. I don't doubt Washington though.
Edit: edited the post to make it more readable.
1. Culver is probably going top 5 and has shown that he is one of the most versatile and NBA ready players in the class. He has a great all around game, good playmaking and passing ability and projects as a solid defender.
Culver has come on as of late, I need to revisit his ratings
2. Little has been terrible so far. He has low IQ, can't do much on offense and didn't look as athletic as he was expected to be. Overall probably the biggest dissapointment of the class (with Grimes) and will probably drop out of the top 10, if not further.
No way Little drops out of top 10 based on potential alone.
Roy Willliams's system not doing him any favors as well. Will look at his ratings
3. I don't see Zion having MVP potential. He has a really high floor but not a ceiling as high as 95. I should say that those things are hard to predict but it seems like he has some limits both on offense and defense. For example he is just not as good of a project as Doncic is (and was expected to be), and Luka has 93 potential. Simmons has 92 and he's better prospect as well, he als was better when entering the league.
This is where I disagree. "IF" and it is a big if Williamson develops a consistent shot his ceiling is through the roof. I think Doncic will not see a huge improvement for next year as he was better coming out than people gave him credit for (ie. ready to play)
4. Langford has looked pretty good on defense lately, thanks to his size he projects as a good defender at the NBA level.
Will revist Langford. So up and down, hard to get a read on.
Some people are high, I just don't see it
5. Doumbouya, Hoard and Okpala will probably play as PF.
Hoard I haven't fully done, but don't see Okpala at PF.
I think he is more of Ingram type - attacking the basket. (could be wrong)
6. Bitadze looked a ton better than Bassey, who didn't have a good season at all. I wouldn't rate them both at 70 as Bitadze could probably be selected in the lottery and Bassey might not even get drafted. I know people really liked Bassey at the start of the year but he really proved them wrong lol.
Bitzdze is by far the better player right now, but doesn't fit in today's NBA. Bassey, while a disappointment, has potential. Faster, can move his feet, developing jumpshot. Will look at
7. Hayes should be a low rating/high potential type of pick. He has shown flashes but still looks very raw.
Again hard to mix overall with potential and get CPU to draft high.
8. I would give Porter Jr a higher potential. Probably one of the highest in the class, although he could be a bust given his poor attitude on and off the floor.
totally agree. Biggest boom vs bust potential. Personally I think bust, but very talented kid
9. King and Washington (him in particular) have first round talent.
Personally King I don't see, Washington maybe. Undersized and a tweener. I don't doubt Washington though.
Edit: edited the post to make it more readable.

Comment