NBA 2K10 Review

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kcxiv
    Banned
    • Dec 2005
    • 2564

    #76
    Re: NBA 2K10 Review

    2K is getting a 9 on on quite a few reputable websites. Its a good game, its better then last years game, no doubt about it. It does have some issues, but what game doesnt.

    Comment

    • J.R. Locke
      Banned
      • Nov 2004
      • 4137

      #77
      Re: NBA 2K10 Review

      I didn't really like this review. In fact when I read it I was pretty much cringing. This is the kind of snarky writing that floods the internet. I wish reviews, especially from OS would be more detailed instead of a general overview of features and bug list.

      Nothing against you personally MMChris I appreciate everything you do on this site and your blogs always promote interesting discussion.

      Next Wednesday. I finally get the game.

      Comment

      • superstarshad
        Rookie
        • Aug 2009
        • 36

        #78
        I can't believe the majority of you feel 2k10 is better than live10. You guys remind me of the movie idiocracy. Give them some bells and whistles....that'll fool them. Live10 is more realistic than madden and the presentation makes for a better basketball game. It is what it is. I purchased the 2k10 combine, and rented both titles today. Played LIve10 first, thinking it would be the inferior product......it held my ps3 hostage. Thinking I was in for bball bliss, I put in 2k10. Played a couple of games, couldn't wait to put LIVE back in. 2k has an awesome playlist though

        Comment

        • dubz
          Rookie
          • Jul 2008
          • 288

          #79
          Re: NBA 2K10 Review

          Framerate issues FTL! What a $60 con job.

          Comment

          • MSUHitman
            Rookie
            • Nov 2006
            • 21

            #80
            Has anyone noticed if free throw animations are fixed this year? From the demo it still seems like the first and second FT's have different framerates again, which makes it hard to sink both shots, even with good FT shooters.

            Comment

            • dave731
              Rookie
              • Dec 2004
              • 315

              #81
              "You can also invite a friend who is online to play with you in your Association. So if you’re one who likes to manage a team year after year but does not necessarily love playing against the CPU, you can invite your buddy or anyone online for that matter to come play with you or as the other team."

              THANK YOU 2K! Madden and NCAA need to take notes!

              Comment

              • Boilerbuzz
                D* B**rs!
                • Jul 2002
                • 5154

                #82
                Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                Originally posted by teamgt
                Madden 10 gets a 9 and NBA 2K10 & NHL 10 gets a 8.5, I'll be the first to say you guys have no clue about ratings
                Honestly, I have to agree. No offense OS'ers. Really, both NHL and NBA 2K represent their sports better than Madden. Honestly, as I think about it, Madden just sucks.

                Ultimately, the scores mean absolutely nothing though. Read the review for what it is. I think it's an outstanding review - and not because I agree with most of it. I think it's fair, balanced, and pretty comprehensive.
                Last edited by Boilerbuzz; 10-06-2009, 11:45 PM.

                Comment

                • Boilerbuzz
                  D* B**rs!
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 5154

                  #83
                  Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                  Originally posted by bailey4mvp
                  This for anyone who has played 2K10 and NBA Live 10.

                  What is a better sim style game (like IRL) and what do you think is the better overall game.
                  Really? Good LORD! You read a 2K review and you have to ask this question? You have to ask this question when there are TONS of threads asking the same question?

                  Comment

                  • Dalsanto0026
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 729

                    #84
                    Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                    Originally posted by sambowie
                    I love how people bash a website for being biased or whatever whenever a game doesn't get a review score they think it deserves. If the people writing these reviews really are so out of whack that they shouldn't be taken seriously, then stop visiting the site! It's that simple.

                    On a different but related note, perhaps OS should stop scoring games and just let the written reviews speak for themselves. The only thing scores do is spark tired flame wars.
                    I love how some people make narrow-minded assumptions about other people without having the common sense to understand what that person is saying. Your interpretation skills need work. I have nothing against the reviewer and thought he gave a decent impression of the game. It's review scores that I'm against because they often don't make any sense when compared with other scores. I shouldn't have to spell out what I'm saying for you.

                    Your last paragraph you've said exactly what I was saying in my post. Do you have trouble reading?

                    Comment

                    • Dalsanto0026
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 729

                      #85
                      Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                      Originally posted by FadeEmAll
                      Please note that standards change each year. If the game was a 9 last year and they re-release the same game with updated rosters, that doesn't mean the game will get another 9. In fact the game would actually decrease to 7.5 or 8 due to lack of innovation. The fact that this game gets 8.5 should not be related to last year's 9.0 in any way.
                      I see what you're saying, but NBA2K and NHL don't need to innovate. If improvements have been made to an already solid title even if the adjustments made are small then logically the game deserves a better score/review as it's better than the previous version. I don't need innovation in 2K10, just the main problems from last year to be ironed out and I'm content. I'm not as picky as some and need a new dribbling system or control scheme or game/graphics engine.

                      Comment

                      • Boilerbuzz
                        D* B**rs!
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 5154

                        #86
                        Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                        Originally posted by AntRWill
                        And I have bought 2K every year since 2K4 and exclusively since 2K6. IMO, the game is more of the same. Too many of the same old problems that made me fustrated have made their way back into the game.
                        For better or worse, THIS statement here killed any credibility you could have possibly started with. Nice drive by.

                        Comment

                        • mojomojo
                          Rookie
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 19

                          #87
                          Good review.
                          I felt the demo was too easy but presentation rocks big time. Well done 2k!
                          <Mojo>

                          Comment

                          • Boilerbuzz
                            D* B**rs!
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 5154

                            #88
                            Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                            Originally posted by Dalsanto0026
                            I see what you're saying, but NBA2K and NHL don't need to innovate. If improvements have been made to an already solid title even if the adjustments made are small then logically the game deserves a better score/review as it's better than the previous version. I don't need innovation in 2K10, just the main problems from last year to be ironed out and I'm content. I'm not as picky as some and need a new dribbling system or control scheme or game/graphics engine.
                            I sorta agree and disagree at the same time. Let's think about it. If you made the perfect game in 08, what else are you expected to do for 09. Now, OF COURSE, 2K10 is FAR from perfect. But if the game was a handful of issues away from being the holy grail, how would you rate it? I have no problem with the rating. It's pretty much what I would have given it, I guess. But at some point, if they are going to make games on an annual basis, you HAVE to be able to sense a year worth of work on the game. The question is, do changes noted in the review represent a fair amount of a year's worth of work for the developers? If you can say 'yes', then maybe you can justify a higher score. If not, a lower score should be expected...

                            With that said, I think NHL, MLB, NBA, soccer, and NFL games need to continue to innovate to some degree. All annual sports game. Otherwise, why should anyone buy them year after year?
                            Last edited by Boilerbuzz; 10-07-2009, 12:01 AM.

                            Comment

                            • mojomojo
                              Rookie
                              • Oct 2009
                              • 19

                              #89
                              Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                              Originally posted by Boilerbuzz
                              I sorta agree and disagree at the same time. Let's think about it. If you made the perfect game in 08, what else are you expected to do for 09. Now, OF COURSE, 2K10 is FAR from perfect. But if the game was a handful of issues away from being the holy grail, how would you rate it? I have no problem with the rating. It's pretty much what I would have given it, I guess. But at some point, if they are going to make games on an annual basis, you HAVE to be able to sense a year worth of work on the game. The question is, do changes noted in the review represent a fair amount of a year's worth of work for the developers? If you can say 'yes', then maybe you can justify a higher score. If not, a lower score should be expected...

                              With that said, I think NHL, MLB, NBA, soccer, and NFL games need to continue to innovate to some degree. All annual sports game. Otherwise, why should anyone buy them year after year?
                              There is a lot of room for improvement not just in games modes or depth in the games, also in the gameplay side. I still believe that we are consuming old gen gameplay, yes we have more animations and amazing graphics but nobody hasn't been able to master real gameplay. I dream with the day where I won't be able to differenciate a videogame from broadcast.
                              <Mojo>

                              Comment

                              • Eddie1967
                                Against The Crowd!
                                • Aug 2005
                                • 2405

                                #90
                                Re: NBA 2K10 Review

                                Originally posted by Boilerbuzz
                                For better or worse, THIS statement here killed any credibility you could have possibly started with. Nice drive by.
                                So true, that statement is the troll calling card. Every time someone says I bought every game since blah blah blah, but this year blah blah blah, I know exactly their agenda is.
                                Originally posted by jim416
                                You are the 2k Police. :)

                                Comment

                                Working...