Yes, I respect your opinion and understand your point of view. I mean no disrespect to the 96-98 Bulls, which were awesome teams with very very talented individuals. But all in all they were an aging team which was not the case with the first three-peat Bulls.
The 91-93 Bulls were very versatile, they could go small, big, medium, they played better defense overall as a team and had more depth (they could win games with their second unit, a luxury the second three-peat Bulls couldn't afford).
They virtually had 3 sixth men in BJ Armstrong, Scott Williams and Cliff Levingston...while Hodges, Perdue, Tucker and Hansen played key roles. Even Stacey King didn't was that bad as many people refer to him.
Harper was a very good versatile player that stood the most of that second three-peat Bulls IMO. Kerr was indeed a poor man's John Paxson, while Wennington was a good center too and Jud Buechler played a similar role as Bobby Hansen, while Longley despite being a decent player, lacked the Basketball I.Q. Cartwright had...
Caffey, Simpkins, Brown or even Salley hmmmm...that's another story. They simply didn't have the impact or energy of players like Scott Williams, Cliff Levingston, Perdue and Craig Hodges coming of the bench.
Both were very good and amazing teams. But for me and MJ (

Comment