New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

[jeebs9]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

I wonder what other post game improvements (talking about down low).

[LeBronistheKing]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Can someone ask Mike if Scottie Pippen got his own signature gather, shots, dribble, size ups, dunk, and lay up packages? Here are some good examples......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tObgS6uUVjQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zyzx6ISXQGw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5mL1L57rtI&feature=watch_response

[drewbs]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Some calls shouldnt be consistently called. A great example should the and 1 animation (Where you get the defender in the air. And draw the foul). It shouldn't be called 100% of the time. The same should go for moving screens. We all know things are not called 100% of the time. Charges aren't called 100% of the time. They is always the gray area. It should be just like that.

So.. basically what you are saying is that the foul calls should be random?

If I have defensive position on the guy that I'm guarding and he barrels through me and there is not a charge call, then that completely eliminates the point of even having the charge call at all in the game. If one is allowed to set moving screens, again it undermines the entire purpose of having those calls in the game if it is random. The game essentially becomes unfair is the rules of basketball are not enforced. The problem in the NBA is that mistakes are made.

[threes_co]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Some calls shouldnt be consistently called. A great example should the and 1 animation (Where you get the defender in the air. And draw the foul). It shouldn't be called 100% of the time. The same should go for moving screens. We all know things are not called 100% of the time. Charges aren't called 100% of the time. They is always the gray area. It should be just like that.

If the ballhandler runs another player over, there is always a call in the NBA.

[jeebs9]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

So.. basically what you are saying is that the foul calls should be random?

If I have defensive position on the guy that I'm guarding and he barrels through me and there is not a charge call, then that completely eliminates the point of even having the charge call at all in the game. If one is allowed to set moving screens, again it undermines the entire purpose of having those calls in the game if it is random. The game essentially becomes unfair is the rules of basketball are not enforced. The problem in the NBA is that mistakes are made.

Nope that's not what I'm saying. I did say "some" right? I was talking more in regards to off-ball screens. I love the pick and roll moving screens calls. I just didn't want to call a screen play and then all of a sudden I hear whistle for a illegal screen which is not my fault. Its like when the CPU gets 3 second. I didn't tell him to camp out in the paint.

[threes_co]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

I'm happy refs in the game are still computer controled robots. If refs were acting like in rel life, no way I would play this game.

They hide ref bias in the "draw foul" tendency. lol

[jeebs9]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

If the ballhandler runs another player over, there is always a call in the NBA.

Nope.... again people keep twisting what I'm saying....lol

They don't call charge every single time someone falls on the floor. We have seen this before. Shannon Brown in the playoffs almost caught a nasty dunk on JRich. But it was a obvious charge...that they called a blocking foul. Stuff like that.

[threes_co]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Nope.... again people keep twisting what I'm saying....lol

They don't call charge every single time someone falls on the floor. We have seen this before. Shannon Brown in the playoffs almost caught a nasty dunk on JRich. But it was a obvious charge...that they called a blocking foul. Stuff like that.

Well OK, but I've seen some debatable charge/blocks in 2K10.

[RIZDRAVER]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Can someone ask Mike if Scottie Pippen got his own signature gather, shots, dribble, size ups, dunk, and lay up packages? Here are some good examples......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tObgS6uUVjQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zyzx6ISXQGw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5mL1...watch_response

I PM'd him that yesterday. I want to know if MJ got more specific animations than even Lebron/Kobe/etc. Seems with his own mode and such focus on him, MJ should have an even larger pack than the other stars in the game.

[drewbs]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Nope that's not what I'm saying. I did say "some" right? I was talking more in regards to off-ball screens. I love the pick and roll moving screens calls. I just didn't want to call a screen play and then all of a sudden I hear whistle for a illegal screen which is not my fault. Its like when the CPU gets 3 second. I didn't tell him to camp out in the paint.

So... again. you're saying that it should be random. Sorry, but how do you determine "some"? It has to be random if "some" of them were to be uncalled.

This is a horrible idea and I do not see why anyone would want this in a game. As for your Richardson example? Are you fing serious? A clear charge that are called blocking fouls? Again, completely undermines the purpose of officiating. You might be happy with a bad call costing you a game that you otherwise should've won, but I think most would be pretty annoyed (again, by "some" it means that it could happen at any point, otherwise, what is even the purpose?)

With the game being as physical as it is today, bad officiating is one of the things that KILLS competitive basketball. The 2006 finals were unwatchable for me, and everyone else who weren't riding Miami's jock at the time. Same with this year's NCAA tournament. How you could possibly want intentional bad officiating in a game is beyond me. Things like miscalled charges? Are you ****ing kidding me? Those can change the outcome of the game, and you want random occurrances to potentially dictate who wins and loses? For what? So it better reflects reality?

[J-Clutch1]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

I think the insight is delayed to later this week..

[Jesus]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Nope.... again people keep twisting what I'm saying....lol

They don't call charge every single time someone falls on the floor. We have seen this before. Shannon Brown in the playoffs almost caught a nasty dunk on JRich. But it was a obvious charge...that they called a blocking foul. Stuff like that.

No charge what so ever. Right before taking the contact square, he chickens out and turns away.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KOiw-9ZeAcA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KOiw-9ZeAcA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

[domidomdomz]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

^^ Yup, Richardson was out of position when the contact was made.

[Rocboyz101]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

Jrich saw his life flash before his eyes..lol

[Vast]

Re: New Info From Mike Wang's Twitter and confirmation of changed sig shots!

I think the insight is delayed to later this week..

DAmn that sucks.