NBA 2K11 Q&A Thread

[ABA QontrolZ]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

Hold on a second I just tested this. Yes you can edit assign trade any player to and from the classic teams. I just created a player didnt edit anything just left his name first and last I assigned him to the 86 Celtics put him in the starting line up into a quick game long story Short the Created player is wearing short shorts by default of being on that team.

sounds great news to me !

It's a video game...

i admitt i lol'd hard ^^

[ABA QontrolZ]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

I am not sure if this was answered. But can you still edit your draft class before the season started like you could in 2K10? Can you still create a draft class and load it to the association? Thanks.

dude, why would they take away some great features like that? i don't have to have played the game to answer that --> yes.

[poilbrun]

drss, I think what he meant was that you would would have been better served with the McD analogy rather than the slavery analogy.

I get what you mean, but if you give me a choice between getting the same game on both consoles or being handled at a fast food like you explained, I might say I don't care about the fast food but want the better game. If you offer me to either have the same game on the two consoles or not being a slave, I know which one I choose and screw the PS3! :-D

[soxnut1018]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

"its a video game..."

It is simpler than that.

It is a product with 2 customer bases; 1 with a regular version and the other a gimped. Both are charged the same.

You go to McD's and they guy in front of you gets the same order as you, yet your's is noticably less appealing. perhaps your bread is stale, perhaps you have noticably less fries. Perhaps you have more ice in your drink. Who knows. And the guy who served you was rude to you, but friendlier to the other guy. Why should this be ok?

Why should it matter if it is a video game, or a cheap fastfood meal? Or something else?

We're talking paying the same $ for an inferior product. Where the product does NOT HAVE TO BE inferior. Its being inferior is a direct result from the company's decision; it isn't a law of nature, nor a fact of life. Decisions were made to allow the gimped version.

I am not loling. I wish I can lol back at your ignorance, but I can't. Because that sort of behavior really saddens me and disappoint me. This is the sort of people who are in America now? "its a video game..."? "lol"?

I suppose downplaying, loling, and keeping a blind eye on unfairness that you can't change, is the best way of handling it. Like I said, I evny this. Ignorance is bliss.

I get being upset, but comparing an inferior video game to slavery is just ridiculous. If you can't see that, well I guess you are the ignorant one.

[Dachozen1]

how tall is john wall?

[2kfanatic]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

I get being upset, but comparing an inferior video game to slavery is just ridiculous. If you can't see that, well I guess you are the ignorant one.

Well most people is treating the ps3 jaggies like the lebron headband issue or any accessory issue which is unfair to us ps3 users since its not like that at all. If the 360 has the same jaggies then I can guarantee you that the game will have a lower score in most review sites and most people will complain about it too.

[ABA QontrolZ]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

I get being upset, but comparing an inferior video game to slavery is just ridiculous. If you can't see that, well I guess you are the ignorant one.

this is what i m thinking too.. i agree with him that u can feel bad as a ps3 player but let's just stick with the mcdo image and drop the slavery one

[ABA QontrolZ]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

back to topic : question for baseball

idk if u used the reelmaker last year, but if yes, do u see some changes in 2k11?
thx

[mph2k]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

Can we add current players to classic teams?
IE. Kevin Durant on the sonics.

[jestep123]

This. We should not be to passive about this issue, I'm not sure if this will make a difference but the least we can do is complain or notify them about how some or most users are not satisfied with a less polished game.

Some of you act like this kind of thing doesnt go on all the time. There is no comparing the two platforms in the game of baseball. If you bought 2k10 on release day, you paid 60 for a far inferior product (and we arent just talking a few jagged edges there). I mean I have wondered aloud for years how whomever makes price point decisons at 2k can allow the baseball product to go out for $60, but it happens and people buy it (or it happens because people buy it, whatever).

These games have to go out with the same price point for these minor issues that occur across platforms. How upset would you be if I paid $10 less because my game has some occasional jagged edges a slight delay that only happens once in a while. You'd be screaming for a few jaggies and a rebate.

Xbox players would have a whole field of baby cows. I know I would.

I mean seriously, I cant pay $10 more for better floor lighting and a few better textures. I got mouths to feed lol.

Also, there I am sure is a back end cost to fixing up the game. I dont know what's involved but I have a feeling it is more than game developers just being lazy. Its all about dollars and cents and if they fix my game as a PS3 owner , chances are that cost is getting spread to EVERYBODY.

[jestep123]

Some of you act like this kind of thing doesnt go on all the time. There is no comparing the two platforms in the game of baseball. If you bought 2k10 on release day, you paid 60 for a far inferior product (and we arent just talking a few jagged edges there). I mean I have wondered aloud for years how whomever makes price point decisons at 2k can allow the baseball product to go out for $60, but it happens and people buy it (or it happens because people buy it, whatever).

These games have to go out with the same price point for these minor issues that occur across platforms. How upset would you be if I paid $10 less because my game has some occasional jagged edges a slight delay that only happens once in a while. You'd be screaming for a few jaggies and a rebate.

Xbox players would have a whole field of baby cows. I know I would.

I mean seriously, I cant pay $10 more for better floor lighting and a few better textures. I got mouths to feed lol.

Also, there I am sure is a back end cost to fixing up the game. I dont know what's involved but I have a feeling it is more than game developers just being lazy. Its all about dollars and cents and if they fix my game as a PS3 owner , chances are that cost is getting spread to EVERYBODY.

To clarify, I meant that MLB 2k10 on xbox is a far inferior game to MLB 10 the Show on PS3.

[Cripterion]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

Some of you act like this kind of thing doesnt go on all the time. There is no comparing the two platforms in the game of baseball. If you bought 2k10 on release day, you paid 60 for a far inferior product (and we arent just talking a few jagged edges there). I mean I have wondered aloud for years how whomever makes price point decisons at 2k can allow the baseball product to go out for $60, but it happens and people buy it (or it happens because people buy it, whatever).

These games have to go out with the same price point for these minor issues that occur across platforms. How upset would you be if I paid $10 less because my game has some occasional jagged edges a slight delay that only happens once in a while. You'd be screaming for a few jaggies and a rebate.

Xbox players would have a whole field of baby cows. I know I would.

I mean seriously, I cant pay $10 more for better floor lighting and a few better textures. I got mouths to feed lol.

Also, there I am sure is a back end cost to fixing up the game. I dont know what's involved but I have a feeling it is more than game developers just being lazy. Its all about dollars and cents and if they fix my game as a PS3 owner , chances are that cost is getting spread to EVERYBODY.

I don't think ps3 owners want a discount. I think they rather have the ps3 version be on par with the 360 instead of 2K putting Move controls and 3D support in the game.

[KyotoCarl]

Re: NBA 2K11 Q&A (Those That Have it Early, Confirmed)

Can't we talk about what's actually in the game and not what it looks like?
If you want to know about graphics, read the reviews for the PS3 version and see what they say about graphics. I want to know more about the game itself!

[jestep123]

I don't think ps3 owners want a discount. I think they rather have the ps3 version be on par with the 360 instead of 2K putting Move controls and 3D support in the game.

I understand but I just think some of the reaction or overreaction to what is being said about the PS3 version is somewhat hyperbolic.

The casual gamers arent going to notice or care and the hardcore guys know the issues and can make their purchase choices accordingly. If you are a PS3 owner, by all means, let yourself be heard on this issue but the fact is that the group of PS3 issues who 1) notice and 2) care enough to let it affect their buying decison is, and always will be minute. Maybe that is the point that is being made, that more people should care but it wont happen unless and until the gameplay or the game features are radically different in the two games.

There is no way that I personally am going to allow a few smoother textures on a game system that I dont even own keep me from getting one of the best if not the best sports game of the year.

I am not calling anyone out, I am using the word "you" in the general sense. To each his own

[drss]

I get being upset, but comparing an inferior video game to slavery is just ridiculous. If you can't see that, well I guess you are the ignorant one.

Of course, differences b/w 2 versions of a product are not equal to slavery. But that much is obvious. That was not a comparison. That was an analogy. It was to illustrate that "i'm ok with that" does not cancel out the situation. Things are not also so literal; some obvious were capable of getting the analogy and its inherent meaning, and some couldn't. I apologize for not being able to cater to everyone's comprehension; nothing much I can do about that.