Do you feel like using "points of emphasis" during timeouts is cheating??

[DarthRambo]

Re: Do you feel like using "points of emphasis" during timeouts is cheating??

That's good info Mos1ed, thanks!

My question is still however, does the cpu use PoE? I see no evidence of it myself, and no dev has stated they do. Until I hear or know for sure that they do I just can't use them myself and give myself and unfar advantage over the cpu. It just doesn't feel right. Like I said, I can comeback from large deficits without them so no need for them, esp if cpu doesn't use them.

[erickonasis]

Re: Do you feel like using "points of emphasis" during timeouts is cheating??

i use it............

[jeffc1]

Re: Do you feel like using "points of emphasis" during timeouts is cheating??

, I've decided for another rule, just to flick the right stick on FTs and let the "real %" take over for real, cuz I make pretty much EVERY free throw at 100 difficulty setting.

How does real % indicate 100% success or even cheating? You will have a lower percentage when using real% vs shot stick. Shot stick is more accurate (cheating?) by default because many users will never master the release. So if you nail the release the percentage is HIGHER than real%.

[mrclutch]

Re: Do you feel like using "points of emphasis" during timeouts is cheating??

How does real % indicate 100% success or even cheating? You will have a lower percentage when using real% vs shot stick. Shot stick is more accurate (cheating?) by default because many users will never master the release. So if you nail the release the percentage is HIGHER than real%.

I think your arguing the wrong side on the point. The original post was that the shot stick was too easy so he uses the real %.