Something is definitely wrong with the draft logic. It heavily favors big man (Which is kind of NICE), then small forwards and point guards. Shooting guards are too underrated. I had 2 shooting guards being the best players of the draft rated 76/75. Both had decent potentials compared to rest of the draft. They got drafted 10th and 14th. Later I bumped their rating ratings to 79-77, they went down to 8-12 range but no dice. The players picked ahead were rated between 73-67 and had lower potentials.
One of these guys are 6'5 other one is 6'6. I even thought that maybe the game heavily favors size over skill, but no. A 6'8 power forward rated 68 with low potential kept getting drafted as 1st or 2nd.
I did run 5 drafts or so, different scenarios & teams did not matter. It is not about the "need" either. Cavs kept drafting a 70 rated PG despite having Kyrie Irving, where they could have drafted a stud SG with enormous potential and or some other bigs. I remember reading that people were drafting Shabazz Muhammad (he is the highest rated player in all of the 2013 draft classes) at late 10's. Guess that wasn't a fluke. AI officially hates SG's and undervalues them.
Comment