Having an Leg makes quick games soooo much easier! I haven't lost a single one of my last 150+ QG.
I couldn't agree with you on this one. You see, I have also a leg but im still losing not much but Im not dominating like I used to. What makes it easier is that you have 4 other (4 UR pro's) great cards.
the funny thing about this pic is; you got 2x Ur support, both are increasing your defense and rebounding. How many UR's you got in total?
I have 15 more UR's (no Pros) and 4 EP. All of them maxed. I am waiting for the right dub EP to sub one of the UR Pros out. Also have 11 maxed Pro Super Rares but i just keep them to train the better cards i get faster (i had Parish maxed out 2 minutes after i got him, i used 4 maxed Super Rare Pros).
The support cards are essentially the same but i only use the first one (for the whole team), so our doesn't matter.
I have 15 more UR's (no Pros) and 4 EP. All of them maxed. I am waiting for the right dub EP to sub one of the UR Pros out. Also have 11 maxed Pro Super Rares but i just keep them to train the better cards i get faster (i had Parish maxed out 2 minutes after i got him, i used 4 maxed Super Rare Pros).
The support cards are essentially the same but i only use the first one (for the whole team), so our doesn't matter.
See your luck rate is higher than mine. I got 21 full trained UR ready to come off that benche. Got 2 dupes UR, 1 leg, 1 epic and 9 Sr pro's, that I use in season.
Just waiting for the new RC so I can pick up mutiple good cards.
Yeah me too. Last time i finished 536th but my win percentage was below 50%. So with my new lineup is hoping to do much better.
Were you doing +5 or +3? If your win % for +5 isn't at least 60%, +3 is mathematically better (assuming you win say 99% of your QG). Realistically if your +5 win % isn't at least 70%, +3 is likely better due to the simple fact +3 games are so much easier that you'll win a good deal of your games before OT saving a good 10-15% of game time per game.
Actually fully trained UR Pro is better than untrained legendary. For QG line-up sometime you don't actually want the best cards and sometime you do want the UR Pro over a legendary because if you find low # game players, their OT card is generally untrained legendary or worst.
Were you doing +5 or +3? If your win % for +5 isn't at least 60%, +3 is mathematically better (assuming you win say 99% of your QG). Realistically if your +5 win % isn't at least 70%, +3 is likely better due to the simple fact +3 games are so much easier that you'll win a good deal of your games before OT saving a good 10-15% of game time per game.
Yeah I was playing +5. You are right, i hadn't calculated it.
Actually fully trained UR Pro is better than untrained legendary. For QG line-up sometime you don't actually want the best cards and sometime you do want the UR Pro over a legendary because if you find low # game players, their OT card is generally untrained legendary or worst.
I guess i am just thinking a little bit on the long term. Ok, in the start a maxed UR Pro is better, but after a little while the Leg gets a lot better.
If i had a choice, i 'd never select 2 combinable Ultra Rares over a Legendary.
Comment