A call out to CD - Make changes or else!

[cdogg777]

Re: A call out to CD - Make changes or else!

I want to thank CD for the slight upgrade to their RTTC. Still not perfect, but at least it's something.

They lowered the total price of cards from 3016 to 2856

431 game nights vs 408

They also made each # divisible by 7. A step in the right direction.

Baby steps cd.

[DiamondsAndMurls]

Re: A call out to CD - Make changes or else!

I agree. I don't own a RTTC card and I'm happy they kept the same total for the end card. I believe it should be a challenge to get the top reward, but glad they lowered the totals slightly. Thanks CD


MyTeam- The North

[Daniel83]

Re: A call out to CD - Make changes or else!

Still not good enough for me. The challenge should not lay in the amount of points needed to get to the last card, it should be deck strength.
The first RttC's from last year were pretty good (before the all PO RttC), you could breeze through the first stages because your deck was just too strong.
But when getting to the latter cards, you needed to decide what you want to do. Going +7 and risking a lot of losses or go +2 or +5 and get more wins.

The huge amount of added points for these low tier cards (compared to 2k15) and double card to boot is just a huge turn-off for me.

And to add to that, we now have a regular Leg Wade, RC leg Wade and after this weekend RttC Leg Wade. Cool!
I got the Wade Leg from the 1st RC, so why should i go for another Wade Leg?

Honestly i dont know the reasoning behind some of these decisions. Why not keep this 2006 RttC for later when there's either Star of Playoff tier in the game (it would have been Star or PO Wade instead of another Leg Wade).

[matt43]

Re: A call out to CD - Make changes or else!

They also made each # divisible by 7. A step in the right direction.

You should be upset they did this... if you hit a tier you can't +7 I'd rather bring 6 points in to it than 0...

[cdogg777]

Re: A call out to CD - Make changes or else!

Still not good enough for me. The challenge should not lay in the amount of points needed to get to the last card, it should be deck strength.
The first RttC's from last year were pretty good (before the all PO RttC), you could breeze through the first stages because your deck was just too strong.
But when getting to the latter cards, you needed to decide what you want to do. Going +7 and risking a lot of losses or go +2 or +5 and get more wins.

The huge amount of added points for these low tier cards (compared to 2k15) and double card to boot is just a huge turn-off for me.

And to add to that, we now have a regular Leg Wade, RC leg Wade and after this weekend RttC Leg Wade. Cool!
I got the Wade Leg from the 1st RC, so why should i go for another Wade Leg?

Honestly i dont know the reasoning behind some of these decisions. Why not keep this 2006 RttC for later when there's either Star of Playoff tier in the game (it would have been Star or PO Wade instead of another Leg Wade).

I agree it's still not good enough. And just FYI. I have 2 regular wade Pros, 1 RC wade pro, and 1 single wade. Also have 2 Lebron pros and one single. I look like a bot in season.

You should be upset they did this... if you hit a tier you can't +7 I'd rather bring 6 points in to it than 0...

Well, in my case there is no tier I can't +7. But I see your point. Here's why you are wrong though. Let's say you don't have time to even do that next tier or it's too hard. The tier you are on costs 211 points. And you completed all +7s and ended at 203points. One more game gets you to 210. So you need that extra gamenight to complete it. If you aren't going into the next tier then it's pointless. What if that was towards the end of the rttc and you never got that final "extra" gamenight you needed. You didn't get your last card simply because they added 1point to the end of the card total.