Which game on 360... live or 2k6. pros and cons as far as game.. I had 2k6 but couldnt get speed of game or fluidity down. Now I have live, i love the pace of the game, but free throws, transition buckets, and a couple other things have put me on the fence.... your opinions??
-
NCAA Basketball- Duke
NCAA Football- The U
NFL- San Francisco 49ers
NBA- Phoenix Suns
MLB- Atlanta Braves
'Life is not a sprint, it's a marathon.. you start off fast, and now ya wheezin' in the back" - Jay-Z (2005) -
Re: wtf or pm..
I know you didn't ask my opinion, but I figure since they are being overloaded with questions I could answer. 2k6 probably plays better out of the box. You can play on default sliders without any adjustments and still get a good game. NBA Live requires you to do some things to get it to play right. If you want to do those things, I'd say go with Live. I know 2k6 has pretty much got universal praise but there are some serious flaws in the game to me. Help defense and court spacing are two things that I think Live does much better than 2k6 and I feel is very important in basketball. 2k6 does offer better plays and screens for shooters, but a lot of times these plays end up feeling scripted when the CPU runs them. Also, having more player specific jumpshots really adds realism to the game. Live gets unconventional players like Dirk better than 2k6 where a PF has to play like a PF. Finally, the player editing is much easier to do than in 2k6.
Comment