IGN- 4.9

[CS10029]

Yup, its Xbox, but I doubt much improvement in the 360 version. http://xbox.ign.com/articles/736/736904p1.html

[CaptainZombie]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Yup, its Xbox, but I doubt much improvement in the 360 version. http://xbox.ign.com/articles/736/736904p1.html

OUCH..

[luv_mist]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Oh My GOODNESS!! That's just....I'm speechless.......Not reading that review.

[CS10029]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Yeah, I dunno man. I respect the fact the diehard fans of this series are really trying to make it playable, but all indications point to an absolute failure by EA.

[Brandon13]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Wow, that's low. Haven't played the game but I can't imagine it being that bad.

[CS10029]

Re: IGN- 4.9

I think that completley disproves any EA conspiracy, which is good. I think EA just didn't give out early review copies knowing how bad the game was. Which is smart.

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/736/736908p1.html 360 version, better at least. Maybe Ill at least give it a rent.

[Sully]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Looks like this series has hit rock bottom. Such a shame. Is it really this bad?

[Rodster]

Re: IGN- 4.9

http://xbox.ign.com/articles/736/736904p3.html

Closing Comments
You broke my heart, NBA Live 07, you broke my heart. The game is full of bugs and glitches that make it almost impossible to play, and the few additions with the X-Factor and "redefined" Freestyle Superstar controls don't make enough impact on the game to make it playable or enjoyable. The additions to the dynasty mode, while nice, still don't save you from that poor gameplay experience (unless you feel like simming every single game). Save yourself the frustration, and let NBA Live 07 ride on the bench for this year. Hopefully it will develop into something stronger in the offseason for next year, minus the irritating game issues.

[Rodster]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Looks like this series has hit rock bottom. Such a shame. Is it really this bad?

[CS10029]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Just so you know the next gen version did get a 6.0, which is somewhat decent I guess. They still said the gameplay was unplayable.

[Miles_Yuhas]

Re: IGN- 4.9

I think that completley disproves any EA conspiracy, which is good. I think EA just didn't give out early review copies knowing how bad the game was. Which is smart.

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/736/736908p1.html 360 version, better at least. Maybe Ill at least give it a rent.

The 360 review is BS, most of the review is copied straight from the XBox one, and many of the things said about the gameplay are just flat out not true. I've been playing the game, and Im not saying its great, but some of the flaws that IGN said were in the game (copied from the Xbox review) are just not true.

[23]

Re: IGN- 4.9

I think that this is awful, and it makes me stand by my words. EA should not charge people 60 bucks for a game they did not finish

[Vince]

Re: IGN- 4.9

I think that this is awful, and it makes me stand by my words. EA should not charge people 60 bucks for a game they did not finish

Agree 100%.

I can stand the fact that they're building the game from the groud up. I really do think it can become a solid title in a year or two, but for christ sakes don't make me pay 80 bucks for something that's still in development.

I wish they would've just taken this year off like MVP did one year.

[blackceasar]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Looks like this series has hit rock bottom. Such a shame. Is it really this bad?

I dont think it as a game standing alone on its own regardless of who made it deserves the IGN score (if this were the score for the 360). To me its more like a 7/10. BUT..while I dont agree with the score for this game, Im glad that gaming sites and magazines now are putting EA on notice....and thats a good thing, even for the EA fanboys.

[erickonasis]

Re: IGN- 4.9

Just so you know the next gen version did get a 6.0, which is somewhat decent I guess. They still said the gameplay was unplayable.

the extra 1.1 was for the graphics but stripped down the 360 version is basically the same with better graphics