well the milicic and anthony looks fine.
Is this the best EA can do?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
karma224 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
I'm actually excited about the Live 2004 game on PC (PC because it has roster patches and gameplay tweaks that make it not so arcady).
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I feel that, there are Live 2003 patches that would make these "haters" head spin.
Now that's detail.
Patches made by Tony, courtesy of nbalive.org
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Those look GREAT and the patch guys for Live PC are outstanding.
Having said that, they (sadly) can't fix the game...which is absolute crap.
Been playing Live for years now...and still no CPU fouls when there's 10 seconds left and your ahead by 1.
Really hope they fix it for 2004...as I have given up on EA.
BTW If the patch guys can get it so good, why the fark can't EA in the first place?Comment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
karma224 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
I'm actually excited about the Live 2004 game on PC (PC because it has roster patches and gameplay tweaks that make it not so arcady).
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I feel that, there are Live 2003 patches that would make these "haters" head spin.
Now that's detail.
Patches made by Tony, courtesy of nbalive.org
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Those look GREAT and the patch guys for Live PC are outstanding.
Having said that, they (sadly) can't fix the game...which is absolute crap.
Been playing Live for years now...and still no CPU fouls when there's 10 seconds left and your ahead by 1.
Really hope they fix it for 2004...as I have given up on EA.
BTW If the patch guys can get it so good, why the fark can't EA in the first place?Comment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
karma224 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
I'm actually excited about the Live 2004 game on PC (PC because it has roster patches and gameplay tweaks that make it not so arcady).
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I feel that, there are Live 2003 patches that would make these "haters" head spin.
Now that's detail.
Patches made by Tony, courtesy of nbalive.org
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Those look GREAT and the patch guys for Live PC are outstanding.
Having said that, they (sadly) can't fix the game...which is absolute crap.
Been playing Live for years now...and still no CPU fouls when there's 10 seconds left and your ahead by 1.
Really hope they fix it for 2004...as I have given up on EA.
BTW If the patch guys can get it so good, why the fark can't EA in the first place?Comment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
There so good because MAKING PLAYERS for NBALIVE is like there life.
They spend 10 plus hours a day making one player.
I've made one and it was real badand I took nearly 3 hours making it.
It takes experience concentration and no life.
Imagine spending 10 hrs. a day for 6 months, making all the player faces right?
It wouldnt be funComment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
There so good because MAKING PLAYERS for NBALIVE is like there life.
They spend 10 plus hours a day making one player.
I've made one and it was real badand I took nearly 3 hours making it.
It takes experience concentration and no life.
Imagine spending 10 hrs. a day for 6 months, making all the player faces right?
It wouldnt be funComment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
There so good because MAKING PLAYERS for NBALIVE is like there life.
They spend 10 plus hours a day making one player.
I've made one and it was real badand I took nearly 3 hours making it.
It takes experience concentration and no life.
Imagine spending 10 hrs. a day for 6 months, making all the player faces right?
It wouldnt be funComment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Really hope they fix it for 2004...as I have given up on EA.
BTW If the patch guys can get it so good, why the fark can't EA in the first place?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Exactly, here's 2 fingers crossed for Live 2004?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
There so good because MAKING PLAYERS for NBALIVE is like there life.
They spend 10 plus hours a day making one player.
I've made one and it was real bad and I took nearly 3 hours making it.
It takes experience concentration and no life.
Imagine spending 10 hrs. a day for 6 months, making all the player faces right?
It wouldnt be fun
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
This sounds more like a personal problem. Why do people make accurate rosters? Is that fun? for them maybe. It takes me 10-15 minutes to patch a face and maybe less for anything else in the game. But that's because I like my game resembling as close to real life as possible. And, yes--it's fun to me. Don't knock people down just because you don't have .001% of there talent nor want it. BTW--I have a life but I love basketball games. This is called my "hobby".
Comment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Really hope they fix it for 2004...as I have given up on EA.
BTW If the patch guys can get it so good, why the fark can't EA in the first place?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Exactly, here's 2 fingers crossed for Live 2004?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
There so good because MAKING PLAYERS for NBALIVE is like there life.
They spend 10 plus hours a day making one player.
I've made one and it was real bad and I took nearly 3 hours making it.
It takes experience concentration and no life.
Imagine spending 10 hrs. a day for 6 months, making all the player faces right?
It wouldnt be fun
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
This sounds more like a personal problem. Why do people make accurate rosters? Is that fun? for them maybe. It takes me 10-15 minutes to patch a face and maybe less for anything else in the game. But that's because I like my game resembling as close to real life as possible. And, yes--it's fun to me. Don't knock people down just because you don't have .001% of there talent nor want it. BTW--I have a life but I love basketball games. This is called my "hobby".
Comment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Really hope they fix it for 2004...as I have given up on EA.
BTW If the patch guys can get it so good, why the fark can't EA in the first place?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Exactly, here's 2 fingers crossed for Live 2004?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
There so good because MAKING PLAYERS for NBALIVE is like there life.
They spend 10 plus hours a day making one player.
I've made one and it was real bad and I took nearly 3 hours making it.
It takes experience concentration and no life.
Imagine spending 10 hrs. a day for 6 months, making all the player faces right?
It wouldnt be fun
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
This sounds more like a personal problem. Why do people make accurate rosters? Is that fun? for them maybe. It takes me 10-15 minutes to patch a face and maybe less for anything else in the game. But that's because I like my game resembling as close to real life as possible. And, yes--it's fun to me. Don't knock people down just because you don't have .001% of there talent nor want it. BTW--I have a life but I love basketball games. This is called my "hobby".
Comment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
after seeing those shots, im gonna go ahead and get live 2004 for pc. but 2k4 and ID for xbox.Comment
-
Re: Is this the best EA can do?
after seeing those shots, im gonna go ahead and get live 2004 for pc. but 2k4 and ID for xbox.Comment
Comment