Live 04 (Home Page)

[CheckMate]

Re: A SHUT UP

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
DueceDiggla said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NONEYON said:
Are you trying to inspire me...bitch...save the glory stories....for me graphics/gameplay keep me coming back.
Pacman may have been a bomb *** game but I could give two ****s about it WHY cause it looks like a tiny yellow ball of [censored you naughty boy]. GRAPHICS DO MATTER...honestly would you buy this game if it looked like ArchRivals. CASE IN POINT

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">



Because you offer noting to these forums and you don't know how to talk to people in a civilized way, you will be banned from the best site on the internet.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

[highpressure]

Re: A SHUT UP

I think it's extremely difficult to judge any game at this point, but what I will say on this matter is that Live looks and sounds as if it will be a huge improvement over the last 3 installments. Of course, this remains to be seen.

I do feel however that EA has the best animations. ID has the best gameplay. Sega has the best graphics. But none of these have produced what I could call the best out-of-box b-ball game ever! Like someone posted earlier, it's really to early to call. But I'm definately sold on ID because of the gameplay.....but I always keep an eye open for Live. While EA has been a disappointment in recent years, I just don't believe that pattern will continue. I for one hope that this is a breakout year for Electronic Arts in the B-ball genre!

[highpressure]

Re: A SHUT UP

I think it's extremely difficult to judge any game at this point, but what I will say on this matter is that Live looks and sounds as if it will be a huge improvement over the last 3 installments. Of course, this remains to be seen.

I do feel however that EA has the best animations. ID has the best gameplay. Sega has the best graphics. But none of these have produced what I could call the best out-of-box b-ball game ever! Like someone posted earlier, it's really to early to call. But I'm definately sold on ID because of the gameplay.....but I always keep an eye open for Live. While EA has been a disappointment in recent years, I just don't believe that pattern will continue. I for one hope that this is a breakout year for Electronic Arts in the B-ball genre!

[highpressure]

Re: A SHUT UP

I think it's extremely difficult to judge any game at this point, but what I will say on this matter is that Live looks and sounds as if it will be a huge improvement over the last 3 installments. Of course, this remains to be seen.

I do feel however that EA has the best animations. ID has the best gameplay. Sega has the best graphics. But none of these have produced what I could call the best out-of-box b-ball game ever! Like someone posted earlier, it's really to early to call. But I'm definately sold on ID because of the gameplay.....but I always keep an eye open for Live. While EA has been a disappointment in recent years, I just don't believe that pattern will continue. I for one hope that this is a breakout year for Electronic Arts in the B-ball genre!

[Bad_Intentions]

Re: A SHUT UP

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NONEYON said:
Are you trying to inspire me...bitch...save the glory stories....for me graphics/gameplay keep me coming back.
Pacman may have been a bomb *** game but I could give two ****s about it WHY cause it looks like a tiny yellow ball of [censored you naughty boy]. GRAPHICS DO MATTER...honestly would you buy this game if it looked like ArchRivals. CASE IN POINT

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

How old are you 13? Have you ever said 1 thing on this board that wasn't blatently bashing a game or another poster?? Have you ever contributed anything?? Please mods...........

[Bad_Intentions]

Re: A SHUT UP

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NONEYON said:
Are you trying to inspire me...bitch...save the glory stories....for me graphics/gameplay keep me coming back.
Pacman may have been a bomb *** game but I could give two ****s about it WHY cause it looks like a tiny yellow ball of [censored you naughty boy]. GRAPHICS DO MATTER...honestly would you buy this game if it looked like ArchRivals. CASE IN POINT

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

How old are you 13? Have you ever said 1 thing on this board that wasn't blatently bashing a game or another poster?? Have you ever contributed anything?? Please mods...........

[Bad_Intentions]

Re: A SHUT UP

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NONEYON said:
Are you trying to inspire me...bitch...save the glory stories....for me graphics/gameplay keep me coming back.
Pacman may have been a bomb *** game but I could give two ****s about it WHY cause it looks like a tiny yellow ball of [censored you naughty boy]. GRAPHICS DO MATTER...honestly would you buy this game if it looked like ArchRivals. CASE IN POINT

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

How old are you 13? Have you ever said 1 thing on this board that wasn't blatently bashing a game or another poster?? Have you ever contributed anything?? Please mods...........

[deadman]

Re: Graphics vs. Gameplay

---------------------------------------------------------
Bad Intentions said:
i just downloaded it from gamespot....

I like how it looks, the players do seem a little short, but i'm sure it would look better on a normal sized TV. I see clear differences between 2003 right off bat. Look at the 1-hand dunk Kobe does...that wasn't in 2003, no way. The Tmac dunk wasnt in 2003 either. Look at how Bibby spots up for the jumper catches the ball and then drains it that part looked real as hell! Look at the part where Darrell Armstrong(I think) tries to pass the ball to a covered teammate...look at how the entire Pistons team reacts as the ball is being thrown and then stolen.. I dont know about yall cats but I'm seeing definate improvement from this teaser. I'm not really a graphics whore, but EA has some of the best animations in the business which can account for alot of graphical downfalls. I hope they get the faces more accurrate, but im not expecting much after that graphics wise at least(besides tweaking of player models, and I mean tweaking not complete overhaul). As long as the AI is straight and it plays like an actual basketball game instead of an and 1 pickup game, I will be a happy camper
-----------------------------------------------------------

Amen!!!
IGN Movie
Graphics: aren't what I would consider "championship" at this level but get the faces more accurate and I'll be happy.
Gameplay: Between all the dunks I would agree there were things of interest. The steal sequence was nice with all the reactions and the Bibby shot looked nice with Kidd closing out.
I am interested in the 10 man Mo- Cap for full court action. (No more of the ball standing around). The ability to "Pro Hop", draw contact, change shots, injuries, blocks more realistic, sliders and more goodies not yet known. They have my attention.

[deadman]

Re: Graphics vs. Gameplay

---------------------------------------------------------
Bad Intentions said:
i just downloaded it from gamespot....

I like how it looks, the players do seem a little short, but i'm sure it would look better on a normal sized TV. I see clear differences between 2003 right off bat. Look at the 1-hand dunk Kobe does...that wasn't in 2003, no way. The Tmac dunk wasnt in 2003 either. Look at how Bibby spots up for the jumper catches the ball and then drains it that part looked real as hell! Look at the part where Darrell Armstrong(I think) tries to pass the ball to a covered teammate...look at how the entire Pistons team reacts as the ball is being thrown and then stolen.. I dont know about yall cats but I'm seeing definate improvement from this teaser. I'm not really a graphics whore, but EA has some of the best animations in the business which can account for alot of graphical downfalls. I hope they get the faces more accurrate, but im not expecting much after that graphics wise at least(besides tweaking of player models, and I mean tweaking not complete overhaul). As long as the AI is straight and it plays like an actual basketball game instead of an and 1 pickup game, I will be a happy camper
-----------------------------------------------------------

Amen!!!
IGN Movie
Graphics: aren't what I would consider "championship" at this level but get the faces more accurate and I'll be happy.
Gameplay: Between all the dunks I would agree there were things of interest. The steal sequence was nice with all the reactions and the Bibby shot looked nice with Kidd closing out.
I am interested in the 10 man Mo- Cap for full court action. (No more of the ball standing around). The ability to "Pro Hop", draw contact, change shots, injuries, blocks more realistic, sliders and more goodies not yet known. They have my attention.

[deadman]

Re: Graphics vs. Gameplay

---------------------------------------------------------
Bad Intentions said:
i just downloaded it from gamespot....

I like how it looks, the players do seem a little short, but i'm sure it would look better on a normal sized TV. I see clear differences between 2003 right off bat. Look at the 1-hand dunk Kobe does...that wasn't in 2003, no way. The Tmac dunk wasnt in 2003 either. Look at how Bibby spots up for the jumper catches the ball and then drains it that part looked real as hell! Look at the part where Darrell Armstrong(I think) tries to pass the ball to a covered teammate...look at how the entire Pistons team reacts as the ball is being thrown and then stolen.. I dont know about yall cats but I'm seeing definate improvement from this teaser. I'm not really a graphics whore, but EA has some of the best animations in the business which can account for alot of graphical downfalls. I hope they get the faces more accurrate, but im not expecting much after that graphics wise at least(besides tweaking of player models, and I mean tweaking not complete overhaul). As long as the AI is straight and it plays like an actual basketball game instead of an and 1 pickup game, I will be a happy camper
-----------------------------------------------------------

Amen!!!
IGN Movie
Graphics: aren't what I would consider "championship" at this level but get the faces more accurate and I'll be happy.
Gameplay: Between all the dunks I would agree there were things of interest. The steal sequence was nice with all the reactions and the Bibby shot looked nice with Kidd closing out.
I am interested in the 10 man Mo- Cap for full court action. (No more of the ball standing around). The ability to "Pro Hop", draw contact, change shots, injuries, blocks more realistic, sliders and more goodies not yet known. They have my attention.

[Nivek]

Re: A SHUT UP

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NONEYON said:
Are you trying to inspire me...bitch...save the glory stories....for me graphics/gameplay keep me coming back.
Pacman may have been a bomb *** game but I could give two ****s about it WHY cause it looks like a tiny yellow ball of [censored you naughty boy]. GRAPHICS DO MATTER...honestly would you buy this game if it looked like ArchRivals. CASE IN POINT

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Tell me you just didn't make fun a PACMAN?

Graphics are accessiries, I could give two [censored you naughty boy] if T-mac's correct shoe, all of AI's tattooes, or VC's high socks are in the game. If your gonna tell me you'd waste 100+ hours on a game that played like ish, but looked nice your a sad little boy.

Gameplay is more valuable to a game then graphics...without gameplay there is no game.

[Nivek]

Re: A SHUT UP

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NONEYON said:
Are you trying to inspire me...bitch...save the glory stories....for me graphics/gameplay keep me coming back.
Pacman may have been a bomb *** game but I could give two ****s about it WHY cause it looks like a tiny yellow ball of [censored you naughty boy]. GRAPHICS DO MATTER...honestly would you buy this game if it looked like ArchRivals. CASE IN POINT

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Tell me you just didn't make fun a PACMAN?

Graphics are accessiries, I could give two [censored you naughty boy] if T-mac's correct shoe, all of AI's tattooes, or VC's high socks are in the game. If your gonna tell me you'd waste 100+ hours on a game that played like ish, but looked nice your a sad little boy.

Gameplay is more valuable to a game then graphics...without gameplay there is no game.

[Nivek]

Re: A SHUT UP

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NONEYON said:
Are you trying to inspire me...bitch...save the glory stories....for me graphics/gameplay keep me coming back.
Pacman may have been a bomb *** game but I could give two ****s about it WHY cause it looks like a tiny yellow ball of [censored you naughty boy]. GRAPHICS DO MATTER...honestly would you buy this game if it looked like ArchRivals. CASE IN POINT

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Tell me you just didn't make fun a PACMAN?

Graphics are accessiries, I could give two [censored you naughty boy] if T-mac's correct shoe, all of AI's tattooes, or VC's high socks are in the game. If your gonna tell me you'd waste 100+ hours on a game that played like ish, but looked nice your a sad little boy.

Gameplay is more valuable to a game then graphics...without gameplay there is no game.