Live has CRAPPY graphics

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SoMiss2000
    Hall Of Fame
    • Oct 2002
    • 20499

    #16
    Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    Alpha said:
    I'm just stating my opinion from the screen shots and videos. It might not be positive but I think I have every right to do so. What are your thoughts on it? Do you disagree that the graphics are crappy and gameplay seems quick like arcade?

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">I'm sure this is why you feel this way </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    Why opt for LIVE? I think ESPN will be well worth the wait. I mean just the presentation itself ESPN is like 2 generations ahead.


    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
    "Never trust a big butt and a smile."-Ricky Bell
    Check out www.sliderset.net



    Currently Listening: The D.O.C.: No One Can Do It Better (evidence that rap music used to be good!)

    Comment

    • CLASSIFIED
      Rookie
      • Jul 2003
      • 404

      #17
      Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

      I have to diesagree about animations looking more authentic. Seriously those animations don't look humanly possible. Not even the running looks realistic. Who shoots the ball like that. As a matter of fact who even does the motion capture. ESPN has Live beat on all accounts even animations. All the animations in ESPN look natural. If they look a little stiff that's cuz motion capture guys are wearing tightass suits with ping pong balls on them all in the spotlight so their gonna be tense. You really need to look at Live's animations cuz there's no way a HUMAN can bend or move like that. Even the defensive stance looks fake. Live's animations do not look realistic.

      Comment

      • CLASSIFIED
        Rookie
        • Jul 2003
        • 404

        #18
        Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

        I have to diesagree about animations looking more authentic. Seriously those animations don't look humanly possible. Not even the running looks realistic. Who shoots the ball like that. As a matter of fact who even does the motion capture. ESPN has Live beat on all accounts even animations. All the animations in ESPN look natural. If they look a little stiff that's cuz motion capture guys are wearing tightass suits with ping pong balls on them all in the spotlight so their gonna be tense. You really need to look at Live's animations cuz there's no way a HUMAN can bend or move like that. Even the defensive stance looks fake. Live's animations do not look realistic.

        Comment

        • CLASSIFIED
          Rookie
          • Jul 2003
          • 404

          #19
          Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

          I have to diesagree about animations looking more authentic. Seriously those animations don't look humanly possible. Not even the running looks realistic. Who shoots the ball like that. As a matter of fact who even does the motion capture. ESPN has Live beat on all accounts even animations. All the animations in ESPN look natural. If they look a little stiff that's cuz motion capture guys are wearing tightass suits with ping pong balls on them all in the spotlight so their gonna be tense. You really need to look at Live's animations cuz there's no way a HUMAN can bend or move like that. Even the defensive stance looks fake. Live's animations do not look realistic.

          Comment

          • jmood88
            Sean Payton: Retribution
            • Jul 2003
            • 34639

            #20
            Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

            The graphics are really bad. I don't know about the gameplay because I haven't played the game but they look like they move way faster then they should be moving.
            Originally posted by Blzer
            Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

            If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

            Comment

            • jmood88
              Sean Payton: Retribution
              • Jul 2003
              • 34639

              #21
              Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

              The graphics are really bad. I don't know about the gameplay because I haven't played the game but they look like they move way faster then they should be moving.
              Originally posted by Blzer
              Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

              If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

              Comment

              • jmood88
                Sean Payton: Retribution
                • Jul 2003
                • 34639

                #22
                Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                The graphics are really bad. I don't know about the gameplay because I haven't played the game but they look like they move way faster then they should be moving.
                Originally posted by Blzer
                Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                Comment

                • Alpha
                  Rookie
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 33

                  #23
                  Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  SoMiss2000 said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  Alpha said:
                  I'm just stating my opinion from the screen shots and videos. It might not be positive but I think I have every right to do so. What are your thoughts on it? Do you disagree that the graphics are crappy and gameplay seems quick like arcade?

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">I'm sure this is why you feel this way </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  Why opt for LIVE? I think ESPN will be well worth the wait. I mean just the presentation itself ESPN is like 2 generations ahead.


                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  This means nothing. My opinion is Live's graphics are crappy. 2 generations ahead in graphics. It is annoying when I'm on ESPN boards and all I see are people hyping up Live. At least I am making a thread stating what I dislike of Live which is the graphics. Just wondering if other Live supporters agree.

                  Comment

                  • Alpha
                    Rookie
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 33

                    #24
                    Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    SoMiss2000 said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    Alpha said:
                    I'm just stating my opinion from the screen shots and videos. It might not be positive but I think I have every right to do so. What are your thoughts on it? Do you disagree that the graphics are crappy and gameplay seems quick like arcade?

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">I'm sure this is why you feel this way </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    Why opt for LIVE? I think ESPN will be well worth the wait. I mean just the presentation itself ESPN is like 2 generations ahead.


                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    This means nothing. My opinion is Live's graphics are crappy. 2 generations ahead in graphics. It is annoying when I'm on ESPN boards and all I see are people hyping up Live. At least I am making a thread stating what I dislike of Live which is the graphics. Just wondering if other Live supporters agree.

                    Comment

                    • Alpha
                      Rookie
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 33

                      #25
                      Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      SoMiss2000 said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      Alpha said:
                      I'm just stating my opinion from the screen shots and videos. It might not be positive but I think I have every right to do so. What are your thoughts on it? Do you disagree that the graphics are crappy and gameplay seems quick like arcade?

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">I'm sure this is why you feel this way </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      Why opt for LIVE? I think ESPN will be well worth the wait. I mean just the presentation itself ESPN is like 2 generations ahead.


                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      This means nothing. My opinion is Live's graphics are crappy. 2 generations ahead in graphics. It is annoying when I'm on ESPN boards and all I see are people hyping up Live. At least I am making a thread stating what I dislike of Live which is the graphics. Just wondering if other Live supporters agree.

                      Comment

                      • MicSoloist
                        Rookie
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 326

                        #26
                        Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                        I've been a Sega Sports guy for a long time, but the graphics on NBA2K3 were crap IMO. The shots look goofy, they run like they need to sh-t, and the dribbling moves are ********. The dunks were great, and the faces were good, but don't sh-t on Live without pointing out the sh-ttiness in NBA2k3


                        I won't judge the new EA and Sega Sports titles until I play them, but the graphics sucked on both last year.


                        -mic-

                        Comment

                        • MicSoloist
                          Rookie
                          • Sep 2002
                          • 326

                          #27
                          Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                          I've been a Sega Sports guy for a long time, but the graphics on NBA2K3 were crap IMO. The shots look goofy, they run like they need to sh-t, and the dribbling moves are ********. The dunks were great, and the faces were good, but don't sh-t on Live without pointing out the sh-ttiness in NBA2k3


                          I won't judge the new EA and Sega Sports titles until I play them, but the graphics sucked on both last year.


                          -mic-

                          Comment

                          • MicSoloist
                            Rookie
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 326

                            #28
                            Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                            I've been a Sega Sports guy for a long time, but the graphics on NBA2K3 were crap IMO. The shots look goofy, they run like they need to sh-t, and the dribbling moves are ********. The dunks were great, and the faces were good, but don't sh-t on Live without pointing out the sh-ttiness in NBA2k3


                            I won't judge the new EA and Sega Sports titles until I play them, but the graphics sucked on both last year.


                            -mic-

                            Comment

                            • jmood88
                              Sean Payton: Retribution
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 34639

                              #29
                              Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                              MicSoloist said:
                              I've been a Sega Sports guy for a long time, but the graphics on NBA2K3 were crap IMO. The shots look goofy, they run like they need to sh-t, and the dribbling moves are ********. The dunks were great, and the faces were good, but don't sh-t on Live without pointing out the sh-ttiness in NBA2k3


                              I won't judge the new EA and Sega Sports titles until I play them, but the graphics sucked on both last year.


                              -mic-

                              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                              How were the graphics in nba2k3 crap? You must have really bad vision.
                              Originally posted by Blzer
                              Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                              If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                              Comment

                              • jmood88
                                Sean Payton: Retribution
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 34639

                                #30
                                Re: Live has CRAPPY graphics

                                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                                MicSoloist said:
                                I've been a Sega Sports guy for a long time, but the graphics on NBA2K3 were crap IMO. The shots look goofy, they run like they need to sh-t, and the dribbling moves are ********. The dunks were great, and the faces were good, but don't sh-t on Live without pointing out the sh-ttiness in NBA2k3


                                I won't judge the new EA and Sega Sports titles until I play them, but the graphics sucked on both last year.


                                -mic-

                                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                                How were the graphics in nba2k3 crap? You must have really bad vision.
                                Originally posted by Blzer
                                Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

                                If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

                                Comment

                                Working...