I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

**PSU** · 10-13-2003, 03:17 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

espn's graphics really arent that great

**NINJAK2** · 10-13-2003, 03:27 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Graphik said:
Well the way I see it is, if there was no ESPN, than Live would be a shoe in for best graphics. Then it would be no one complaining about the faces, texures, models, etc.

<hr /></blockquote>

True. The graphics are fine in Live and I think they look better than 2003's. ESPN still wins the beauty contest IMHO though. Live looks good enough to compete if the gameplay is tight which is what counts. Competition breeds better games as it could have been a possibility that Live may not have had freestyle,10 man freestyle, training camps, or real team specific courts if there was no ESPN/2k. On the other hand, ESPN may not have redesigned their ball control, defensive options, fast breaks, and features if there was no Live.

**NINJAK2** · 10-13-2003, 03:27 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Graphik said:
Well the way I see it is, if there was no ESPN, than Live would be a shoe in for best graphics. Then it would be no one complaining about the faces, texures, models, etc.

<hr /></blockquote>

True. The graphics are fine in Live and I think they look better than 2003's. ESPN still wins the beauty contest IMHO though. Live looks good enough to compete if the gameplay is tight which is what counts. Competition breeds better games as it could have been a possibility that Live may not have had freestyle,10 man freestyle, training camps, or real team specific courts if there was no ESPN/2k. On the other hand, ESPN may not have redesigned their ball control, defensive options, fast breaks, and features if there was no Live.

**NINJAK2** · 10-13-2003, 03:27 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Graphik said:
Well the way I see it is, if there was no ESPN, than Live would be a shoe in for best graphics. Then it would be no one complaining about the faces, texures, models, etc.

<hr /></blockquote>

True. The graphics are fine in Live and I think they look better than 2003's. ESPN still wins the beauty contest IMHO though. Live looks good enough to compete if the gameplay is tight which is what counts. Competition breeds better games as it could have been a possibility that Live may not have had freestyle,10 man freestyle, training camps, or real team specific courts if there was no ESPN/2k. On the other hand, ESPN may not have redesigned their ball control, defensive options, fast breaks, and features if there was no Live.

**myownsun** · 10-13-2003, 03:51 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NINJAK2 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Graphik said:
Well the way I see it is, if there was no ESPN, than Live would be a shoe in for best graphics. Then it would be no one complaining about the faces, texures, models, etc.

<hr /></blockquote>

True. The graphics are fine in Live and I think they look better than 2003's. ESPN still wins the beauty contest IMHO though. Live looks good enough to compete if the gameplay is tight which is what counts. Competition breeds better games as it could have been a possibility that Live may not have had freestyle,10 man freestyle, training camps, or real team specific courts if there was no ESPN/2k. On the other hand, ESPN may not have redesigned their ball control, defensive options, fast breaks, and features if there was no Live.

<hr /></blockquote>

Hellava post ninjak

**myownsun** · 10-13-2003, 03:51 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NINJAK2 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Graphik said:
Well the way I see it is, if there was no ESPN, than Live would be a shoe in for best graphics. Then it would be no one complaining about the faces, texures, models, etc.

<hr /></blockquote>

True. The graphics are fine in Live and I think they look better than 2003's. ESPN still wins the beauty contest IMHO though. Live looks good enough to compete if the gameplay is tight which is what counts. Competition breeds better games as it could have been a possibility that Live may not have had freestyle,10 man freestyle, training camps, or real team specific courts if there was no ESPN/2k. On the other hand, ESPN may not have redesigned their ball control, defensive options, fast breaks, and features if there was no Live.

<hr /></blockquote>

Hellava post ninjak

**myownsun** · 10-13-2003, 03:51 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NINJAK2 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Graphik said:
Well the way I see it is, if there was no ESPN, than Live would be a shoe in for best graphics. Then it would be no one complaining about the faces, texures, models, etc.

<hr /></blockquote>

True. The graphics are fine in Live and I think they look better than 2003's. ESPN still wins the beauty contest IMHO though. Live looks good enough to compete if the gameplay is tight which is what counts. Competition breeds better games as it could have been a possibility that Live may not have had freestyle,10 man freestyle, training camps, or real team specific courts if there was no ESPN/2k. On the other hand, ESPN may not have redesigned their ball control, defensive options, fast breaks, and features if there was no Live.

<hr /></blockquote>

Hellava post ninjak

**Bredrin** · 10-13-2003, 03:53 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
FootballForever said:
Here another Pic I found that as of 10/13 it is the PS2 verison. I think it looks sweet.

<hr /></blockquote>
Look at those damn hobits! its shameful!

**Bredrin** · 10-13-2003, 03:53 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
FootballForever said:
Here another Pic I found that as of 10/13 it is the PS2 verison. I think it looks sweet.

<hr /></blockquote>
Look at those damn hobits! its shameful!

**Bredrin** · 10-13-2003, 03:53 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
FootballForever said:
Here another Pic I found that as of 10/13 it is the PS2 verison. I think it looks sweet.

<hr /></blockquote>
Look at those damn hobits! its shameful!

**CLASSIFIED** · 10-13-2003, 04:18 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
PSU said:
espn's graphics really arent that great

<hr /></blockquote>

Why are you deluding yourself? ESPN's are almost photo realistic. Have you seen the K-Mart screenie? That pic is scary real. Stop the bull-ish about ESPN's graphics aren't all that cuz they are. They shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence with any other game out there. Live's aren't horrible but, they are a generation behind ESPN's. Do ya'll know ESPN will have self-shadowing on all the players. Do you know how realistic these players will look just cuz of that lighting itself. ESPN's graphics are never before seen in a sports game on this level. Dudes should be buying it just too see how bad-*** this game looks.

**CLASSIFIED** · 10-13-2003, 04:18 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
PSU said:
espn's graphics really arent that great

<hr /></blockquote>

Why are you deluding yourself? ESPN's are almost photo realistic. Have you seen the K-Mart screenie? That pic is scary real. Stop the bull-ish about ESPN's graphics aren't all that cuz they are. They shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence with any other game out there. Live's aren't horrible but, they are a generation behind ESPN's. Do ya'll know ESPN will have self-shadowing on all the players. Do you know how realistic these players will look just cuz of that lighting itself. ESPN's graphics are never before seen in a sports game on this level. Dudes should be buying it just too see how bad-*** this game looks.

**CLASSIFIED** · 10-13-2003, 04:18 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
PSU said:
espn's graphics really arent that great

<hr /></blockquote>

Why are you deluding yourself? ESPN's are almost photo realistic. Have you seen the K-Mart screenie? That pic is scary real. Stop the bull-ish about ESPN's graphics aren't all that cuz they are. They shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence with any other game out there. Live's aren't horrible but, they are a generation behind ESPN's. Do ya'll know ESPN will have self-shadowing on all the players. Do you know how realistic these players will look just cuz of that lighting itself. ESPN's graphics are never before seen in a sports game on this level. Dudes should be buying it just too see how bad-*** this game looks.

**RoyalBoyle78** · 10-13-2003, 04:42 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

Bredrin Im sorry hobits?

**RoyalBoyle78** · 10-13-2003, 04:42 PM

Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

Bredrin Im sorry hobits?

I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment