The ratings......

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Holt88
    Rookie
    • Aug 2003
    • 98

    #16
    Re: The ratings......

    Just because of ratings? WOW. Well have fun with ESPN.

    Comment

    • BigTigLSU
      H*p H*p 4 H*rs*m*n
      • Sep 2002
      • 6506

      #17
      Re: The ratings......

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      Alimo said:
      thanks for the ratings, i just dont want to spend $50 bucks and take the time to edit.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      EA ratings are different because
      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

      Another thing that I remember is that EA makes the ratings more about position. Meaning Ray Allen may be rated higher at his position but it does mean he is better. A 90 guard is not comparable to a Center or PF in High 80s since its not the same position and their overall rating is affected higher or lower for different reasons. Gaurds being judged on Ball Handling Outside Shooting rather than Inside and Steals at a higher priority than say Rebounds and blocks and Vice Versa for PF and Centers. Of course there are universal ratings like Awareness and stamina I think if you look at it with this approach it is more easier to understand but than you have wonder why Ray would be so high compared to Rip Hamilton who should be at least a 80


      The question that is more important is what is Duncan's rating compared to the rest of the PF/C if he is the highest rated Big man then it is accurate. Kobe Tmac ratings should be similar but Iverson ratings wise will suffer because of his lack of strength, Rebounding etc. No knock on him its just basic sense.When judging players judge them to comparable players TMac and Kobe AI vs Marbury (Scoring small Gaurds)

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      What he said
      RIP Drucilla S Thomas 1952-2008 "Love You Momma"
      www.grownmansports.com
      Facebook.com/grownmansports

      Comment

      • BigTigLSU
        H*p H*p 4 H*rs*m*n
        • Sep 2002
        • 6506

        #18
        Re: The ratings......

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        Alimo said:
        thanks for the ratings, i just dont want to spend $50 bucks and take the time to edit.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        EA ratings are different because
        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

        Another thing that I remember is that EA makes the ratings more about position. Meaning Ray Allen may be rated higher at his position but it does mean he is better. A 90 guard is not comparable to a Center or PF in High 80s since its not the same position and their overall rating is affected higher or lower for different reasons. Gaurds being judged on Ball Handling Outside Shooting rather than Inside and Steals at a higher priority than say Rebounds and blocks and Vice Versa for PF and Centers. Of course there are universal ratings like Awareness and stamina I think if you look at it with this approach it is more easier to understand but than you have wonder why Ray would be so high compared to Rip Hamilton who should be at least a 80


        The question that is more important is what is Duncan's rating compared to the rest of the PF/C if he is the highest rated Big man then it is accurate. Kobe Tmac ratings should be similar but Iverson ratings wise will suffer because of his lack of strength, Rebounding etc. No knock on him its just basic sense.When judging players judge them to comparable players TMac and Kobe AI vs Marbury (Scoring small Gaurds)

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        What he said
        RIP Drucilla S Thomas 1952-2008 "Love You Momma"
        www.grownmansports.com
        Facebook.com/grownmansports

        Comment

        • BigTigLSU
          H*p H*p 4 H*rs*m*n
          • Sep 2002
          • 6506

          #19
          Re: The ratings......

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          Alimo said:
          thanks for the ratings, i just dont want to spend $50 bucks and take the time to edit.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          EA ratings are different because
          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

          Another thing that I remember is that EA makes the ratings more about position. Meaning Ray Allen may be rated higher at his position but it does mean he is better. A 90 guard is not comparable to a Center or PF in High 80s since its not the same position and their overall rating is affected higher or lower for different reasons. Gaurds being judged on Ball Handling Outside Shooting rather than Inside and Steals at a higher priority than say Rebounds and blocks and Vice Versa for PF and Centers. Of course there are universal ratings like Awareness and stamina I think if you look at it with this approach it is more easier to understand but than you have wonder why Ray would be so high compared to Rip Hamilton who should be at least a 80


          The question that is more important is what is Duncan's rating compared to the rest of the PF/C if he is the highest rated Big man then it is accurate. Kobe Tmac ratings should be similar but Iverson ratings wise will suffer because of his lack of strength, Rebounding etc. No knock on him its just basic sense.When judging players judge them to comparable players TMac and Kobe AI vs Marbury (Scoring small Gaurds)

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          What he said
          RIP Drucilla S Thomas 1952-2008 "Love You Momma"
          www.grownmansports.com
          Facebook.com/grownmansports

          Comment

          • LHayes37
            Banned
            • Jul 2002
            • 1311

            #20
            Re: The ratings......

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            Alimo said:
            thanks for the ratings, i just dont want to spend $50 bucks and take the time to edit.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            Welcome to America, where laziness takes another giant leap forward. This is arguably the lamest reason I have ever heard not to buy a game.

            Comment

            • LHayes37
              Banned
              • Jul 2002
              • 1311

              #21
              Re: The ratings......

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              Alimo said:
              thanks for the ratings, i just dont want to spend $50 bucks and take the time to edit.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              Welcome to America, where laziness takes another giant leap forward. This is arguably the lamest reason I have ever heard not to buy a game.

              Comment

              • LHayes37
                Banned
                • Jul 2002
                • 1311

                #22
                Re: The ratings......

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                Alimo said:
                thanks for the ratings, i just dont want to spend $50 bucks and take the time to edit.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                Welcome to America, where laziness takes another giant leap forward. This is arguably the lamest reason I have ever heard not to buy a game.

                Comment

                • SKINSFAN0303
                  Rookie
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 229

                  #23
                  Re: The ratings......

                  what are the ratings for the t'wolves

                  Comment

                  • SKINSFAN0303
                    Rookie
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 229

                    #24
                    Re: The ratings......

                    what are the ratings for the t'wolves

                    Comment

                    • SKINSFAN0303
                      Rookie
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 229

                      #25
                      Re: The ratings......

                      what are the ratings for the t'wolves

                      Comment

                      • bdunn13
                        GATA
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 4499

                        #26
                        Re: The ratings......

                        Please use the other ratings thread. When Fossen locks that thread, feel free to start a new one.

                        BD
                        Rent this space.

                        Comment

                        • bdunn13
                          GATA
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 4499

                          #27
                          Re: The ratings......

                          Please use the other ratings thread. When Fossen locks that thread, feel free to start a new one.

                          BD
                          Rent this space.

                          Comment

                          • bdunn13
                            GATA
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 4499

                            #28
                            Re: The ratings......

                            Please use the other ratings thread. When Fossen locks that thread, feel free to start a new one.

                            BD
                            Rent this space.

                            Comment

                            Working...