Multiplayer Dynasty?

[laker8la]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

You speak the truth man.. this makes my desecion a whole lot easier.. I mean I can understand last year because they went through a overhaul for the franchise, but this year it makes no sense not to have it.. Without multiplayer dynasty it's not even worth my $50 now(or however much live will cost).

I rather go with the $20 game I know nothing about at this time.

They had multi-player season last year. I played a whole season with some of my friends. As long as they still have this, I will be happy.

[laker8la]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

You speak the truth man.. this makes my desecion a whole lot easier.. I mean I can understand last year because they went through a overhaul for the franchise, but this year it makes no sense not to have it.. Without multiplayer dynasty it's not even worth my $50 now(or however much live will cost).

I rather go with the $20 game I know nothing about at this time.

They had multi-player season last year. I played a whole season with some of my friends. As long as they still have this, I will be happy.

[TDKing]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

I won't be picking this up either if it doesn't have Multi Player Dynasty.

[TDKing]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

I won't be picking this up either if it doesn't have Multi Player Dynasty.

[tenth]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

Live always seems to get screwed with that. NHL has had multiplayer dynasties since 2001 or 2002, and to top it off you could do it across the internet/network on PC...

[tenth]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

Live always seems to get screwed with that. NHL has had multiplayer dynasties since 2001 or 2002, and to top it off you could do it across the internet/network on PC...

[FloridaGators]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

They had multi-player season last year. I played a whole season with some of my friends. As long as they still have this, I will be happy.

I did the same thing, but I would much rather have a shorter season and make it 5 years down the line, then just do one 82 game season.

This way free agency can play a bigger factor in the human controlled teams.

[FloridaGators]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

They had multi-player season last year. I played a whole season with some of my friends. As long as they still have this, I will be happy.

I did the same thing, but I would much rather have a shorter season and make it 5 years down the line, then just do one 82 game season.

This way free agency can play a bigger factor in the human controlled teams.

[mvb34]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

It was confirmed over at the NLSC that there will NOT be multi user dynasty mode. I was a bit upset about it too, but I'm over it now. This game will still be very solid, IMHO.

This opens the door for ESPN for me!! Bad move by EA!!

[mvb34]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

It was confirmed over at the NLSC that there will NOT be multi user dynasty mode. I was a bit upset about it too, but I'm over it now. This game will still be very solid, IMHO.

This opens the door for ESPN for me!! Bad move by EA!!

[cocobee]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

I was upset about it because I have a roomate who is an NBA fanatic as well. We just played the same dynasty last year. But I remember the fueds we would have with multi-player franchises. I was hoping they would add this to 2005.-it really sucks.

[cocobee]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

I was upset about it because I have a roomate who is an NBA fanatic as well. We just played the same dynasty last year. But I remember the fueds we would have with multi-player franchises. I was hoping they would add this to 2005.-it really sucks.

[undisputed55]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

I am very disapointed in EA. Multi-player dynasty is pretty easy to put into a game. I wouldn't care if it took double the space on my memory card than a single player franchise. Still EA does seem to be on track to put out a good game and atleast there's the dunkoff which is a new multiplayer addition.

[undisputed55]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

I am very disapointed in EA. Multi-player dynasty is pretty easy to put into a game. I wouldn't care if it took double the space on my memory card than a single player franchise. Still EA does seem to be on track to put out a good game and atleast there's the dunkoff which is a new multiplayer addition.

[Miles_Yuhas]

Re: Multiplayer Dynasty?

you have got to be kidding me! if they did not add multiplayer dynasty i will skip on buying this game, period. that may sound a bit harsh but there is flat out no reason to not have this. i sure hope that it will have multi user franchise mode and on the same note march madness better have it as well. i enjoy playing these games but they really need to have this.

EA seems to be really slow on bringing multiplayer dynasty. It doesn't bother me much but it must really suck for people in college with roommates. It sucks also cause Live is better than ESPN. Maybe they think that there "DYNASTY" modes are to deep for multi-teams.