After one year in Franchise......

[dpetaccia]

All of the teams are rated from 90 to 99. There are no bad teams. All the teams are great. Does anyone else notice this in Live 05?

[99Potential]

Re: After one year in Franchise......

All of the teams are rated from 90 to 99. There are no bad teams. All the teams are great. Does anyone else notice this in Live 05?

With default rosters, I have seen 94 rated teams miss the playoffs, so I wouldn't consider it that big a deal. Overall team ratings don't seem to mean too much as far as who does well in season. Not saying I've seen the Bobcats get 60 wins, but I have seen Denver win the championship, so I wouldn't read too much into team ratings.......

[99Potential]

Re: After one year in Franchise......

All of the teams are rated from 90 to 99. There are no bad teams. All the teams are great. Does anyone else notice this in Live 05?

With default rosters, I have seen 94 rated teams miss the playoffs, so I wouldn't consider it that big a deal. Overall team ratings don't seem to mean too much as far as who does well in season. Not saying I've seen the Bobcats get 60 wins, but I have seen Denver win the championship, so I wouldn't read too much into team ratings.......

[RoyalBoyle78]

Re: After one year in Franchise......

With default rosters, I have seen 94 rated teams miss the playoffs, so I wouldn't consider it that big a deal. Overall team ratings don't seem to mean too much as far as who does well in season. Not saying I've seen the Bobcats get 60 wins, but I have seen Denver win the championship, so I wouldn't read too much into team ratings.......

I doesn't really make a huge differnce, but I can see where it would bothers us a bit. If a team is bad there rating should be bad period

[RoyalBoyle78]

Re: After one year in Franchise......

With default rosters, I have seen 94 rated teams miss the playoffs, so I wouldn't consider it that big a deal. Overall team ratings don't seem to mean too much as far as who does well in season. Not saying I've seen the Bobcats get 60 wins, but I have seen Denver win the championship, so I wouldn't read too much into team ratings.......

I doesn't really make a huge differnce, but I can see where it would bothers us a bit. If a team is bad there rating should be bad period

[Ofizzle]

Re: After one year in Franchise......

The overall team ratings doesn't mean that much, if you update all players you'll have most teams at about 85+, and all the better or more talented teams in the 90's, their's obviously still teams in the 80-85 range and under [Bobcats, Nets w/o Kidd, Bulls, Warriors]

Anyways, they do need a new way of determining team ratings though, more factors need to be added, like depth at multiple positions. If you have a decent starting lineup, and 5 good guards on your bench, your team will get a good rating even though they have all guards, that shouldn't happen.

[Ofizzle]

Re: After one year in Franchise......

The overall team ratings doesn't mean that much, if you update all players you'll have most teams at about 85+, and all the better or more talented teams in the 90's, their's obviously still teams in the 80-85 range and under [Bobcats, Nets w/o Kidd, Bulls, Warriors]

Anyways, they do need a new way of determining team ratings though, more factors need to be added, like depth at multiple positions. If you have a decent starting lineup, and 5 good guards on your bench, your team will get a good rating even though they have all guards, that shouldn't happen.