The reason CPU PG's get low assists...

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • Court_vision
    Banned
    • Oct 2002
    • 8290
    #31
    Re: The reason CPU PG's get low assists...

    Originally posted by Pared
    Wow monk. I notice how you take EVERYTHING to an extreme.

    Nowhere in that post did I discount anything you posted. I actually just commented that some of you prefer to post ABOUT the games instead of playing them.

    Next time, read my post without your little preconceived notions, 'kay?
    Haha...no problem bro. I wasn't that serious.

    I wasn't taking a shot at you...i only just noticed now i put that thumb emotion...meant to put the ...sorry for that

    Post or play? Personally, I prefer to post about the games when at work...I have trouble playing them here funnily enough

    Side note : there's nothing wrong with guys criticisng EA contextually and fairly. Things like "we've added a mid range game" and then finding out all it is is cpu players no longer pro hop...they just shoot 17 footers...is a valid criticism.

    Most people who read "mid range game" think actual plays / guys coming off screens. ie, something genuinely new.

    As I said before, that's typical EA. They'll promote something...often leaving out small "truths" as they do it. Their famous / infamous for it...but it's brilliant marketing, and it sells product, so good luck to them.

      Comment

      • RedmanR
        MVP
        • Aug 2003
        • 2120
        #32
        Re: The reason CPU PG's get low assists...

        Originally posted by monkey
        Haha...no problem bro. I wasn't that serious.

        I wasn't taking a shot at you...i only just noticed now i put that thumb emotion...meant to put the ...sorry for that

        Post or play? Personally, I prefer to post about the games when at work...I have trouble playing them here funnily enough

        Side note : there's nothing wrong with guys criticisng EA contextually and fairly. Things like "we've added a mid range game" and then finding out all it is is cpu players no longer pro hop...they just shoot 17 footers...is a valid criticism.

        Most people who read "mid range game" think actual plays / guys coming off screens. ie, something genuinely new.

        As I said before, that's typical EA. They'll promote something...often leaving out small "truths" as they do it. Their famous / infamous for it...but it's brilliant marketing, and it sells product, so good luck to them.
        Yeah...Your right "SO much good luck to them" as we the consumer once again shell out hard earned cash every hoop season wishing for the best or near perfect changes and get just another dead end street in which we've turned down. I must admit I'd rather see the CPU shoot then pro-hop any day I'm quite sure we'd all like to see which game boss, Live or ESPN who is willing to put all chips aside and "Come-Clean" about flaws we will experince or at least take in account what went wrong the year before...Or how can we make a complete game I mean hats off for both series coming out before the season even starts, But what good is that to alot of us if we have to figure out how are we going to add this player or that player I noticed that alot of us go through the extreme just to get a realist game...I mean we spend hours and sometimes days in search of something they(Live&ESPN) should already have in the game. After all, who's making millions Now don't you guys take this the wrong way, this is only my opinon...Keep Ballin'
        Where they DO that? ? ?

          Comment

          • RedmanR
            MVP
            • Aug 2003
            • 2120
            #33
            Re: The reason CPU PG's get low assists...

            Originally posted by monkey
            Haha...no problem bro. I wasn't that serious.

            I wasn't taking a shot at you...i only just noticed now i put that thumb emotion...meant to put the ...sorry for that

            Post or play? Personally, I prefer to post about the games when at work...I have trouble playing them here funnily enough

            Side note : there's nothing wrong with guys criticisng EA contextually and fairly. Things like "we've added a mid range game" and then finding out all it is is cpu players no longer pro hop...they just shoot 17 footers...is a valid criticism.

            Most people who read "mid range game" think actual plays / guys coming off screens. ie, something genuinely new.

            As I said before, that's typical EA. They'll promote something...often leaving out small "truths" as they do it. Their famous / infamous for it...but it's brilliant marketing, and it sells product, so good luck to them.
            Yeah...Your right "SO much good luck to them" as we the consumer once again shell out hard earned cash every hoop season wishing for the best or near perfect changes and get just another dead end street in which we've turned down. I must admit I'd rather see the CPU shoot then pro-hop any day I'm quite sure we'd all like to see which game boss, Live or ESPN who is willing to put all chips aside and "Come-Clean" about flaws we will experince or at least take in account what went wrong the year before...Or how can we make a complete game I mean hats off for both series coming out before the season even starts, But what good is that to alot of us if we have to figure out how are we going to add this player or that player I noticed that alot of us go through the extreme just to get a realist game...I mean we spend hours and sometimes days in search of something they(Live&ESPN) should already have in the game. After all, who's making millions Now don't you guys take this the wrong way, this is only my opinon...Keep Ballin'
            Where they DO that? ? ?

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 3 template Next
              Working...