nlgaming.com
They gave it a score of 87. Good review. I am starting to like their reviews on their site.
They gave it a score of 87. Good review. I am starting to like their reviews on their site.
-
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
Now see here. I wouldn't care if he gave ID a 57 or an 87, atleast this was a well written review. A balanced review talking about graphics, gameplay, sound, online, dynasty, etc. This is the most intelligently written review I have seen so far, regardless of score. It just so happens to get a great score.
Favorite Sports Teams
NFL - Carolina Panthers
NBA - Charlotte Hornets
MLB - Cincinnati Reds
College Basketball - Wake Forest
NCAA Football - Appalachian State -
Re: Next level gaming review is up
Now see here. I wouldn't care if he gave ID a 57 or an 87, atleast this was a well written review. A balanced review talking about graphics, gameplay, sound, online, dynasty, etc. This is the most intelligently written review I have seen so far, regardless of score. It just so happens to get a great score.
Favorite Sports Teams
NFL - Carolina Panthers
NBA - Charlotte Hornets
MLB - Cincinnati Reds
College Basketball - Wake Forest
NCAA Football - Appalachian StateComment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
Now see here. I wouldn't care if he gave ID a 57 or an 87, atleast this was a well written review. A balanced review talking about graphics, gameplay, sound, online, dynasty, etc. This is the most intelligently written review I have seen so far, regardless of score. It just so happens to get a great score.
Favorite Sports Teams
NFL - Carolina Panthers
NBA - Charlotte Hornets
MLB - Cincinnati Reds
College Basketball - Wake Forest
NCAA Football - Appalachian StateComment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
I agree. Their review of links is also well written and you can tell the guy put time in to it and also did not have his Tiger Woods(ea) glasses on.Whether it received a good score or not at least I got a idea about how the game plays.Comment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
I agree. Their review of links is also well written and you can tell the guy put time in to it and also did not have his Tiger Woods(ea) glasses on.Whether it received a good score or not at least I got a idea about how the game plays.Comment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
I agree. Their review of links is also well written and you can tell the guy put time in to it and also did not have his Tiger Woods(ea) glasses on.Whether it received a good score or not at least I got a idea about how the game plays.Comment
-
-
-
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
It was a good review. Very in-depth and I like how he compared it to his review from last year ie: what they've improved.
Also no mention of 'tough button presses' anywhere.
Comment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
It was a good review. Very in-depth and I like how he compared it to his review from last year ie: what they've improved.
Also no mention of 'tough button presses' anywhere.
Comment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
It was a good review. Very in-depth and I like how he compared it to his review from last year ie: what they've improved.
Also no mention of 'tough button presses' anywhere.
Comment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
Not to flame, but I see all of you talking about how good a review this one is. I think it's because Drive got a reasonably good score. But I want to know what makes this reviewer more credible to you. The people who are looking forward to this game base their anticipation on what they called GREAT GAMEPLAY from Drive 2003.
Yet the reviewer says,
"Last year, I really grilled Inside Drive 2003. In fact, I gave it a 67 for lack of online play and a pretty flawed graphic and gameplay engine."
Now all the Drive lovers would agree to disagree with the reviewers opinion of a FLAWED GAMEPLAY ENGINE in 2003, cause after all, that's what Drive players love about it, right?
So back to my early question....what makes the reviewer more credible now????Comment
-
Re: Next level gaming review is up
Not to flame, but I see all of you talking about how good a review this one is. I think it's because Drive got a reasonably good score. But I want to know what makes this reviewer more credible to you. The people who are looking forward to this game base their anticipation on what they called GREAT GAMEPLAY from Drive 2003.
Yet the reviewer says,
"Last year, I really grilled Inside Drive 2003. In fact, I gave it a 67 for lack of online play and a pretty flawed graphic and gameplay engine."
Now all the Drive lovers would agree to disagree with the reviewers opinion of a FLAWED GAMEPLAY ENGINE in 2003, cause after all, that's what Drive players love about it, right?
So back to my early question....what makes the reviewer more credible now????Comment
Comment