Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Skins4Life
    MVP
    • Jul 2002
    • 2286

    #1

    Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.



    Which leads me to the pre game shows. I don’t want to hear what Mike, Tim, Bill, Steven or Greg think the teams or players should do. I want more information on what they are doing. Why is it that only football pre games or in game analysts talk about plays? Why can’t we get some basketball analysts who break down games and tell us what plays are being run, how the defenses are reacting to them and whats working or not working? Give me something of substance beyond “Duncan has got to show up”. “Joe Dumars told Rasheed to take his shot when they were in the elevator together.”

    We have gotten some in game analysis about where certain players like to shoot from… mostly Bruce Bowen and Tim Duncan, and that Chauncey Billups likes to shoot 3s in the 4th quarter, but beyond that it seems like the announcers assume the fans not only know nothing about the game, but they want to keep it that way.

    One of the best features, I think in Sports Illustrated is the scouting reports on teams and players. Give us some knowledge from the people who get paid to scout the league. The more we can give insights from insiders rather than listen to what Ben Wallace’s wife told him for the 9th time (it was ok as a fun fact the first time), the more involved fans will be with the game.



    Watching the games on TV would be 5x better if they did this. Tell everyone what strategies and plays each team wants to run, what kind of defense they like and how they do it. Use visual representations and video tape of what they're talking about while they talk about it. Break down the game like a scout or coach would. Show us what's really going on. That would be far, far better than "X has to step it up".


    Animated diagrams of plays, detailed breakdowns of each teams' philosophies. And I don't mean "they both play hard-nosed D". I mean specifics. Do they play one on one forcing the star to beat them? Do they trap aggressively? How good are they at rotating? Do they try to force the ball to a certain area of the floor? Do they try to force the ball a certain direction on drives? Which way?


    Same goes with offense. I'm tired of "they're a slow it down, grind it out team" or "they're a fast-paced, run-and-gun" team. SHOW ME what they run. What they try to do. What do the plays look like. All they'd need is someone explaining it while the picture is something like what you see here on nba.com:


    (Click on the picture of the play to see the animation; that animation is what I have in mind)



    I don't know how else to say it. I would love love LOVE it if this were to happen.
  • gez20
    Rookie
    • Aug 2003
    • 453

    #2
    Re: Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

    I agree with Cuban. . . at the very least it could give the casual fan some insight into the game. Where else are they going to learn what a Stagger Play is, what a Princeton offense looks like, etc. I would love to know the different sets teams run, what their money plays are. . . things of that nature. I've noticed Hubie tries to do some of these things during the game.

    I really don't care for Greg Anthony and Bill Walton's braindead analysis, most of us here could do the same. I'm sure these guys have a vast knowledge of the game. . . why not make the most of it.

    Comment

    • backbreaker
      Banned
      • Jul 2002
      • 3991

      #3
      Re: Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

      Its virtually impossible to have Play by Play and analytical commentary during a basketball game of any level. The game is perpectual motion, possessions change at the drop of a hat. They do give in depth analysis during breaks and where time permits.

      Michaels: Parker to the left wing, Duncan on the block

      Brown on the top of Michaels(sound engineer nightmare) now breaking down the play being run simultaneously, now thats a simulcast...lol

      BTW guys, basketball is a very simple game and plays are seldom run, mostly after timeouts. Mismatches are exploited and the hot hand is feed in NBA basketball. The guys on all networks do a fairly decent job, they are there mainly for the entertainment value and to be personable, Give you tidbits of info on plays.

      Time is of the essence, you are getting cliff note version of players and plays.

      Comment

      • utexas
        Greatness
        • Jan 2003
        • 4867

        #4
        Re: Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

        Originally posted by backbreaker
        Its virtually impossible to have Play by Play and analytical commentary during a basketball game of any level. The game is perpectual motion, possessions change at the drop of a hat. They do give in depth analysis during breaks and where time permits.

        Michaels: Parker to the left wing, Duncan on the block

        Brown on the top of Michaels(sound engineer nightmare) now breaking down the play being run simultaneously, now thats a simulcast...lol

        BTW guys, basketball is a very simple game and plays are seldom run, mostly after timeouts. Mismatches are exploited and the hot hand is feed in NBA basketball. The guys on all networks do a fairly decent job, they are there mainly for the entertainment value and to be personable, Give you tidbits of info on plays.

        Time is of the essence, you are getting cliff note version of players and plays.
        pre-game is the issue, not in game.
        The Sports Preacher
        The Sports Preacher on Facebook
        @ipreachsports twitter/instagram
        https://www.facebook.com/thesportspreacher/
        https://www.facebook.com/ipreachspor...PAGES_TIMELINE

        Comment

        • glucklich
          Banned
          • Jun 2004
          • 4272

          #5
          Re: Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

          Dr. Jack Ramsay used to do this...I can remember him saying the Bulls would defeat the Portland Trailblazers in the finals because the Bulls played the best combination of a half-court and a fast break game, while the Blazer were overspecialized in the fast break. Low and behold the Bulls won.

          Comment

          • 23
            yellow
            • Sep 2002
            • 66469

            #6
            Re: Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

            They could explain key plays teams use during timeout or whatnot.

            Explain it while its being shown on the replay.

            The game is pretty quick, so they'd probably have to pick their spots where they could do this.

            Comment

            • Pointguard
              MVP
              • Jun 2005
              • 2977

              #7
              Re: Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

              Cubes does it again.

              Comment

              • VanCitySportsGuy
                NYG_Meth
                • Feb 2003
                • 9351

                #8
                Re: Something in Cuban's blog I strongly agree with.

                I think most of the fans don't care for that level of analysis.

                If it was in such high demand, I'm sure it would already be in broadcasts by now.

                Comment

                Working...