Dalembert

[remix]

Re: Dalembert

They could have always gone for Kwame, Swift or even Curry to add to the list. That is a load of money, but I'm not surprised after seeing the Warriors resign Adonal Foyle for 5YR/41.6M last year. It must be great to be a bigman

[Kashanova]

Re: Dalembert

It is entirely too much dough...but who else is out there that can give you what Sammy Dalembert can?

What does he give you? Not double digits points, Not Double Digit Rebounds, Not 1 plus assists, not even 3 plus or 2 plus blocks. That's to much for someone who hasn't done that much at all. He's a good player but this money on potential is getting out of hand

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: Dalembert

What does he give you? Not double digits points, Not Double Digit Rebounds, Not 1 plus assists, not even 3 plus or 2 plus blocks. That's to much for someone who hasn't done that much at all. He's a good player but this money on potential is getting out of hand

After all the stuff I put up a stink about in the NBA forum, I wouldn't base how Dalembert played by his numbers by his numbers. Jim O'Brien had him in the wrong system. How is it that Dalembert averaged more than 2 blocks a game last year...then htis past season, his blocks go down to over just 1? Despite Randy Ayers' failure here and Chris Ford, they atleast had the Sixers playing defense and when Sammy D was in the game, they used him correctly. Mo Cheeks will do the same.

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: Dalembert

They could have always gone for Kwame, Swift or even Curry to add to the list. That is a load of money, but I'm not surprised after seeing the Warriors resign Adonal Foyle for 5YR/41.6M last year. It must be great to be a bigman

Kwame who?

Swift, I would take, but the Sixers are WAY over the came. Not happening.

Curry, I like but again, the Sixers are way over the cap. And there would no reason to sign and trade Curry for Dalembert.

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: Dalembert

Yea, and that was probably a figure they could've thrown at Tyson, maybe cheaper.
Thats alot of money

Sixers have no money to spend. Tyson Chandler isn't taking mid-level money. Because that is all the Sixers can give. Way over the cap. WAY.

And another thing, I 'm a Chandler fan and all...but he is not a center. Dalembert IS a center. So Chandler doesn't give me what Dalembert can.

Gadzuric put up similar numbers, but he doesn't bring the athleticism and overall talent that Dalembert has.

That is why I said nobody out there gives you what Sammy does.

[Vince]

Re: Dalembert

Gadzuric is redundant because he already re-signed with the Bucks at 6 years/$ 36 million.

[23]

Re: Dalembert

Sixers have no money to spend. Tyson Chandler isn't taking mid-level money. Because that is all the Sixers can give. Way over the cap. WAY.

And another thing, I 'm a Chandler fan and all...but he is not a center. Dalembert IS a center. So Chandler doesn't give me what Dalembert can.

Gadzuric put up similar numbers, but he doesn't bring the athleticism and overall talent that Dalembert has.

That is why I said nobody out there gives you what Sammy does.

Of course I didnt think it was possible because Tyson is a RFA, and Chicago said they'd match any offers for him, which is why you dont see much talk of any team aquiring him.

I like Sam dont get me wrong. I wouldnt mind him on my squad any day. Thing about Jim O'Brien is, whichever team he coaches, there is always a player that develops some kind of kink in his game. He had Toine and PP jacking up 3's like desperate gunners all season in his last year there.

You see Toine has changed, not only because of the trades but Obrien's system to me seems worthless to someone who wants to win.