NBA GAME AI Reviewed

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Court_vision
    Banned
    • Oct 2002
    • 8290

    #1

    NBA GAME AI Reviewed

    I have read numerous reviews around the net of 2K3 and ID2003. One thing that very very few reviews have touched on is the artificial intelligence in the games. I feel this is a major flaw in the reviews, as this should be paramount in a sports game.

    So, for anyone who may still be deciding what game to get (and just to get it off my chest as it's been bugging me) I have done an AI test. I used two of the best combinations in the NBA, Pierce and Walker and Shaq and Kobe, and tested both games. All results are how the AI reacted to the tests.

    Below are the results.

    Paul Pierce and Antoine Walker.
    In both games, I pulled my defender away from them and thus left them wide open. In Inside Drive, both drove to the hoop and converted. In 2K3 neither reacted. On several occasions a wide open Paul Pierce simply threw the ball to Vin Baker, recieved the pass back, threw it back again and Baker put up a close range shot. I then tried giving them space at the three point line. In ID2003 both took the open three's. Walker in particular would shoot the three consistently. In 2K3, Pierce would occasionally shoot the three as the shot clock wound down. Walker never shot an open three.

    Plays run for them.
    ID2003 saw Walker come off screens and shoot threes and jumpers as well as post up players regularly. Pierce drove to the hoop often and shot open jumpers. In 2K3, both had only generic moves run for them. Pierce would shoot the jumper as scoring guards do in the game with a few seconds left on the shot clock. Both would shoot close up hook shots from inside the paint.

    Shaq and Kobe.

    In 2K3 Kobe plays similarly to Paul Pierce. Open jumpers were offered but not taken. Lanes to the hoop were left wide open and rarely driven through. Shots from within the paint were high. In ID2003, Kobe drove through open lanes and pulled up for any Jump shots that were offered. He also passed extremely well when doubled.

    Shaq was offered the match up of Charlie Ward in both games. Don't laugh. In 2K3, AI Shaq never backed Ward down. He spun off him and shot short jumpers well. In ID2003 AI Shaq backed down Ward and dunked over him repeatedly. Of note, IN 2K3 rarely did the AI offer the over matched Ward any support. In ID2003, Kurt Thomas regualry came in to offer a double team.

    Ball managemnet. In 2K3, the computer AI walked out of bounds at leat three times a game. This never occured in ID2003. In ID2003, the computer AI would sometimes throw poor passes that were intercepted.

    Team styles. 2K3 failed to run any screens for guys like Walker to shoot three's. In fact, it never utilised his double skills of possessing an inside and outside game. In ID2003 walker posted up regularly and then would turn up on the perimeter to nail a three. The way this game captures the Celtics stregths was superb. The lakers ran a clear triangle in ID2003. In 2K3 they seemed to run a genric style. Shaq shot a lot from five feet and Kobe put up shots as the shot clock expired. Fisher penetrated off the dribble.

    Worst moment. 2K3 watching an open Antoine Walker not take an open shot, not even drive, nothing. Just pass to Vin Baker. This happens over and over. Very poor.

    Best moment. ID2003 Walker shooting a three off a screen having posted up Lee Nailon on the previous offensive play.

    Overall. I love what sega have done with 2K3. They have revolutionised b-ball games and deserve applause. The stadiums and atmosphere is superb. I posted here a week ago to that affect. However, the AI is plain and simply terrible. It pains me to say that, but it is. The 2K series looked good when it only had the LIVE series to be compared to, however when compared to ID it just looks terrible. The generic AI is very poor. The limited play sets are painful after 20 games. You actually know what the AI will do. Leave it's scoring guard wide open and it won't react because that's the play that the power forward gets the ball. Terrible.

    ID2003 is dull as anything. The presentation is lifeless. However, the AI is beyond good. You want to play the Celtics and take on their inside and outside game? This is your game. You want to take on Shaq, Kobe and the triangle? This is your game.

    I have changed my mind several times on which game to use for my season. I have started and re-started on both. When it's all said and done, you can live with poor presentation. You can't live with a season of horrible AI.

    ID2003 wins the AI battle by so far it's not even close.

    AI ratings.
    ID2003 95/100.
    2K3 60/100.


  • EWRMETS
    All Star
    • Jul 2002
    • 7491

    #2
    Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

    Why you got to take shots at Live, all the things you're talking bad about 2k3 is in Live in terms of AI.

    Comment

    • Brando70
      Pro
      • Jul 2002
      • 646

      #3
      Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

      Monkey --

      I didn't have the same experience against Walker and Pierce in 2k3. I've played against them a few times, on Pro with some slider adjustments, and they took shots whenever they were open, both inside and out. In the four games I've played vs. the Celtics, Walker and Pierce took the lion's share of shots from all over the place, with Baker occasionally chipping in if he was open in the paint.

      Not bagging on ID because it's very good, but I think 2k3's offensive AI is challenging and works the strengths of the offense.

      Comment

      • 23
        yellow
        • Sep 2002
        • 66469

        #4
        Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

        What type of slider settings did you use? In nba2k3 try turning up the ai sliders to max, and see if it's wise to leave Pierce, and Wlaker open.

        Comment

        • lasthour
          Pro
          • Sep 2002
          • 621

          #5
          Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

          A look (monkey), I feel you on the A.I. I thought the A.I. was good on NBA 2k3, until I got my hands on ID. There definitely is no comparison in the gameplay department. 2k3 is good or outstanding in other departments such as courts, presentation, and what I call the-pull-you-in-feel. If ID can Improve the presentation, overall graphics and the pull-you-in-feel a lot of people who have not tried this game will be shocked by how deep the gameplay is in this game.

          2k3 simple needs to tweak its gameplay and A.I. From there It only needs to add polish to all other areas.

          And of course Live needs to tweak its gameplay, A.I., player abilities, individual courts.

          Oh yeh they all need foul adjusting.
          What world do you live in?

          Comment

          • Court_vision
            Banned
            • Oct 2002
            • 8290

            #6
            Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

            Hi mate

            I used arena's sliders on all star. Both players OA raised to 95.

            Yes, Pierce and Walker will shoot a lot near the paint. So will most players. Yes, Pierce will jack up three's (albeit amazingly awkward looking one's) when the SG plays is run. However, you can test it yourself. Leave them free on the perimeter. Guard them with someone and then pull the defender away. Walker in particuar simply did not react. He just stands turns down open threes 99% of the time.

            Comment

            • neovsmatrix
              MVP
              • Jul 2002
              • 2878

              #7
              Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

              Ideal game would be taking NBA Live 2003's control (it's awesome, IMHO), taking NBA 2k3's graphics and presentation, and takind ID 2003's AI. I finally got Live 2003 to play on my pc. I couldn't do it until I switched my USB mouse to a PS/2 port thanks to a converter I had lying around. The framerates improved dramatically and the game was very playable. It's fun, although a little awkward at first with getting familiar with the controls. I love the control, but I'm not crazy about the arcade feel of it. Though I downloaded some updates some fan posted from the nba-live.com website and the game is much better. fewer blocks and steals.

              Comment

              • grtwhtsk
                Pro
                • Jul 2002
                • 598

                #8
                Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                Thanks for doing the comparison. It is very informative and helpful for someone like me. I hope this doesn't turn into any sort of post as to what game is the best. I think we have all had our share of that. If anything, it's interesting to hear what others have to say if they tried to run some tests like you did. Sliders are another topic altogether. I for one like to have them if needed, but prefer a game that plays well out of the box. Prior to having sliders, we expected nothing short of the best from the developers.

                Comment

                • damaja
                  Rookie
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 74

                  #9
                  Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                  That is true during regular season games on NBA2K3. Anytime i've played the lakers during regular season i usually beat them pretty easily with any team. Shaq and kobe don't usually take many shots at all.

                  HOWEVER, the playoffs on 2k3 are a different story on allstar level. I've been in the playoffs twice and have never been past the first round. A few days ago, I played the lakers and handled them rather easily in the first game. Then got swept in the next 3 games of the series. This was the first time i ever saw the ai play this well. Kobe and shaq played just like their true selves. I had no answer for either. Shaq domintated the post. Kobe shot the lights out and slash his way to the basket. I think both averaged nearly 30 pts in that series. I tried everything possible to stop them. I played zone....doubled shaq (which is when kobe took over)...doubled kobe (which didnt help very much since he just shot over me.).... I actually sort of felt what other nba teams had to deal with when facing the lakers.

                  I dont think you get to see the real ai until the playoffs on allstar level for 2k3.
                  (By the way i'm using arenas sliders, also)

                  Never played ID2003, but if the ai is any better than that....whoa

                  Comment

                  • Court_vision
                    Banned
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 8290

                    #10
                    Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                    Very true Neo. Combine the three and we have EXACTLY what we all want.

                    I am not in anyone's camp. Whichever game gives me all that combined, I am switching to it.

                    As it stands now, I have had to work out what I want the most. For me, ID2003 AI wins out. 2K3's atmosphere and presentation comes a close second and Live 2003's control comes third.

                    To the guy who posted why don't I praise Live. As stated before, I really like authentic arena's and playing styles. Live had neither of these, that's why I flicked it. It's fun though.

                    Comment

                    • Court_vision
                      Banned
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 8290

                      #11
                      Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                      Damaja

                      Yes...2K3 seems to go up in the play off's. What I'll probably do is just play the play offs with that game now. My season was just wearing me down, and I was only 20 games in. The flaws are too big to over look loger than that.

                      Having played both, I have to say ID's AI is that much better. They have odviously spent a lot of time on it (and forgotten about the presentation!)

                      Comment

                      • neovsmatrix
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 2878

                        #12
                        Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                        Although ID 2003's presentation is lackluster, I really like their endgame commentary. It just seems more in depth to me than NBA 2k3's. As for Live 2003, yeah, I'm very disappointed as far as the gameplay AI goes. I think I like its defense better than that in NBA 2k3 though. Its offense just sucks, because teams don't seem to play the way they do in real life. As for my priorites, I really would rank presentation dead last. ID 2003's is mediocre, but it gets the job done for me. It's the control and actual gameplay AI that really keeps me interested in the game.

                        Comment

                        • Emjay
                          Pro
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 546

                          #13
                          Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                          I will agree that ID's AI is much better than 2k3, but the AI in 2k3 is not that bad. I played with the Knicks vs. Celtics the other day and Pierce and Walker killed me. I didn't back off them so they could shoot threes, but they had no problem hitting them with me guarding them. I haven't played the Lakers yet, so I don't know how Shaq and Kobe play. As for me I haven't seen anyone in 2k3 back down anyone sucessfully, so I'm not holding my breath on that one.

                          Comment

                          • wwharton
                            *ll St*r
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 26949

                            #14
                            Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                            This is a very strange thread.

                            #1 I think anyone you ask would've told you from day one that ID has the best AI out of the games. All the arguing on this board and that may be the one thing that's never been in question.

                            #2 It seems unfair to make a post this long in comparison without including Live (which I would've been interested in).

                            #3 I don't know what level you're playing on, what sliders you're using, etc, etc but not only will Pierce and Walker shoot all over me in 2k3 but when I got Pierce in foul trouble and Delk came in he shot all over me too (like he would in real life). Did you turn down the offensive awareness or something?

                            Comment

                            • Graphik
                              Pr*s*n*r#70460649
                              • Oct 2002
                              • 10582

                              #15
                              Re: NBA GAME AI Reviewed

                              I think the post was very informative which i appreciate. And we all know how lives AI is. Its good(except when they cheat).
                              But I think he sumed it up good.
                              Theres no denying it guys, the AI in 2k3 is mediocore. It needs work. Its still a fun game but all he was trying to do was test and see if the players actually play like themselves. And based of what other people said ID has it right b/c the addition of player sliders.
                              I think Live has always done a good job with thier offensive AI. The right players take the majority of the shots and they play somewhat like thier rel life counterparts. Not 100%, but close. Closer than 2k3. I dont have a XBox so I will never ge a chance to play ID but he is much appreciated for the breakdown of the AI.
                              And I think that nobody here can argue with him until they tried what he did.
                              http://neverfollow.biz (Independent Music Group)

                              Comment

                              Working...