USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Originally posted by MassNoleLast edited by MikeRo72; 08-04-2006, 09:48 PM.Dios mio, por favor dame paciencia con estos jugadores que aceptan productos "glitchy" -
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Mr. Robinson bringing his neighborhood to Barcelona!
He's easily better than this year's Spurs' representative.... I would say the 1996 Dream Team beats the 2006 USA team pretty easily.SAN ANTONIO SPURSComment
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Originally posted by MikeRo72Guys, you are killing me....11.......11 of the greatest players on the planet. My all time favorite....Brooklyn's Finest...(No, not Marbury)....the original Brooklyn's finest...Chris Mullin. Laettner was a poser, and if anything he was there to shut the critics who were crying that the Olympics was an amatuer event and only college players should be allowed to play. But Mullin...he is a top 50...2nd only to Patrick Ewing during his college carreer. Put it this way....Golden State made him GM hoping he would bring back the winning ways that have been absent in Oakland since he retired.
Dream Team was a compilation of 11 of the greatest players!Honestly, I really love Chris Mullin. He is not a physical player but he knows how to hold his ground. He is up there as one of the best shooters of all time.
Comment
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Originally posted by SarahLOL about the Marbury joke.Honestly, I really love Chris Mullin. He is not a physical player but he knows how to hold his ground. He is up there as one of the best shooters of all time.
As for the Admiral....man.....in any other era he would be up there with Russell and Chamberlin...but he played against Olojuwon, Ewing, and Shaq....he too doesnt get the credit he desrves. Who knows what his numbers would have been if he didnt take those 4 years after the academy to serve for the Navy?Dios mio, por favor dame paciencia con estos jugadores que aceptan productos "glitchy"Comment
-
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Originally posted by KDRE_OSNot over Shaq he wasnt. Shaq should've had that spotComment
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
the NBA game has changed a lot over the years...the 92 team would be so much more physical, if they were whistling fouls like they do in the 2006 NBA I think it would take the 92 team a while to get used to that. If they let them play, I think the 92 team would take out the 06 team. Jordan > LeBron, Magic > whoever, Stockton, Bird, etc...Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-7009-7102-8818Comment
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Originally posted by MikeRo72The only knock on Mullin is that he wasn't fleet afoot. A "slowski" if you will...but you know what he never gets credit for? He was the high scorer for those fast breaking teams of the early 90s. Tim Hardaway, Mitch Richmond, Chris Webber, Latrell Sprewell. Mullin was the high scorer on those transition teams.....isnt that crazy?
As for the Admiral....man.....in any other era he would be up there with Russell and Chamberlin...but he played against Olojuwon, Ewing, and Shaq....he too doesnt get the credit he desrves. Who knows what his numbers would have been if he didnt take those 4 years after the academy to serve for the Navy?
LOL!! If David Robinson is not in the era of Olajuwon and Ewing, he will be in the era of Russell, Kareem, and Chamberlain. Those where even harder to guard because of thier deadly hookshots which was a lost art of the NBA in the 90's. Of course if he played in todays era he will be dominant. He will make Ben Wallace look like a "small Ben".Comment
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Why was this even suggested.... No one can beat the 92 team.Comment
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Originally posted by shugknightOk, lets say, 5-6 years from now, the same players on the current USA basketball team are still playing for USA basketball. Of course, they've grown up, matured, and most likely have gotten better than they currently are right now.
Now put that team up against the team from 92. Jordan, Bird, Magic.
Who would win? I know you can easily say the 92 team will mop up this years team, but its a good matchup if you ask me. Of course we dont know how good these players will be 5-6 years from now, but everyone knows that these guys are the future of the NBA, and are the elite of the league.
So just imagine this matchup
USA '92
John Stockton/Magic Johnson
Michael Jordan/Clyde Drexlar
Scottie Pippen/Larry Bird
Charles Barkely/Karl Malone
David Robinson/Patrick Ewing
VS
USA '06
Chris Paul/Kirk Hinrich
Dwayne Wade/Gilbert Arenas
Lebron JAmes/Carmelo Anthony
Chris Bosh/Elton Brand
Dwight Howard/Amare Stoudemire
I think I'd be willing to pay 100+ bucks just to see this matchup. Unfortunately, unless we're able to clone the 92 team, it will never happen. So in your opinion, who would win. Please try to be open-minded about the current USA roster. Dont knock on them becuase they are young. I know the 92 team can be dominant, but I think 06 could easily put up a good fight.
PG - Magic
SG - MJ
SF- Bird
PF - Malone
Please. Not one of those mentioned in the '06 team could hold a candle to their '92 counterparts. To end this discussion, we just need to mention the following things:
Points Scored
Titles Won
MVPs
All-Star
NBA First Team
NBA Second Team
International Win/Loss Record
and....
Olympic Gold Medals.Comment
-
Re: USA Basketball '92 vs '06 (in their prime)
Wrong forum Shuge...we all know that LeBron and Wade will end up being mediocre when it's said and done, and that humanity not only stopped evolving in 1995, but began a steady regression.
Hell....we'll all be single-celled critters again by 2110.Last edited by HMcCoy; 08-07-2006, 11:10 PM.Hank's Custom Collectibles 3D printer/painter extraordinaireComment
Comment