Alright. Francis, Marbury, and Davis aren't "true" point guards. But they still run the offense, get the team involved, and in most cases find a way to win. If you asked Marbury, Davis, and Francis to be "true" point guards, then their teams would end up losing more games than winning.
"Steve Nash sucks"....
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
Alright. Francis, Marbury, and Davis aren't "true" point guards. But they still run the offense, get the team involved, and in most cases find a way to win. If you asked Marbury, Davis, and Francis to be "true" point guards, then their teams would end up losing more games than winning. -
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
That may be true XxCiMaxX, because those teams are built with their scoring in mind. The game has changed, but there is still a balance. I think they'd all do better to shoot a little less and pass a little more, and Marbury is proving that this year.
I'm not justing bashing those three, I'm willing to say that about any point guard. As I stated earlier, I think Jason Kidd deserves some criticism for his play of late, and I'm a big Jason Kidd fan.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
That may be true XxCiMaxX, because those teams are built with their scoring in mind. The game has changed, but there is still a balance. I think they'd all do better to shoot a little less and pass a little more, and Marbury is proving that this year.
I'm not justing bashing those three, I'm willing to say that about any point guard. As I stated earlier, I think Jason Kidd deserves some criticism for his play of late, and I'm a big Jason Kidd fan.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
If you asked Marbury, Davis, and Francis to be "true" point guards, then their teams would end up losing more games than winning.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
And that's why Nash is a better PG, you said it yourself.Originally Posted by Briman123
I'd rather drink beer because drinking alot of beers makes you more manly.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
If you asked Marbury, Davis, and Francis to be "true" point guards, then their teams would end up losing more games than winning.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
And that's why Nash is a better PG, you said it yourself.Originally Posted by Briman123
I'd rather drink beer because drinking alot of beers makes you more manly.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
If you asked Marbury, Davis, and Francis to be "true" point guards, then their teams would end up losing more games than winning.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
And that's why Nash is a better PG, you said it yourself.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah really
Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
If you asked Marbury, Davis, and Francis to be "true" point guards, then their teams would end up losing more games than winning.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
And that's why Nash is a better PG, you said it yourself.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah really
Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
No, actually I didn't say that. Marbury, Davis, and Francis NEED to be shoot first PGs because their teams lack other scoring threats, where as Nash has Nowitski and Finley.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
No, actually I didn't say that. Marbury, Davis, and Francis NEED to be shoot first PGs because their teams lack other scoring threats, where as Nash has Nowitski and Finley.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
No, actually I didn't say that. Marbury, Davis, and Francis NEED to be shoot first PGs because their teams lack other scoring threats, where as Nash has Nowitski and Finley.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> I'll make this short, Hardaway,Marion, Stoudamire,Mashburn, Wesley, Ming, Mobley, and there are more. You should have worded it different, maybe said they are their respective teams best scorere perhaps?Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
No, actually I didn't say that. Marbury, Davis, and Francis NEED to be shoot first PGs because their teams lack other scoring threats, where as Nash has Nowitski and Finley.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> I'll make this short, Hardaway,Marion, Stoudamire,Mashburn, Wesley, Ming, Mobley, and there are more. You should have worded it different, maybe said they are their respective teams best scorere perhaps?Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
But I know what you're saying xxcimaxx, you were just trying to say they're their teams best scorers.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
But I know what you're saying xxcimaxx, you were just trying to say they're their teams best scorers.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
But I know what you're saying xxcimaxx, you were just trying to say they're their teams best scorers.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Exactly.Comment
-
Re: \"Steve Nash sucks\"....
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
But I know what you're saying xxcimaxx, you were just trying to say they're their teams best scorers.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Exactly.Comment
Comment