C&C...Curry and Chandler!

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jod23
    Rookie
    • Oct 2002
    • 275

    #1

    C&C...Curry and Chandler!

    Has anybody noticed how much these two kids have come on this season? As a die-hard Bulls fan (part time Wiz fan } I am pretty excited about these two guys.

    These are their averages since the All Star Break.

    Tyson Chandler
    14.2ppg
    10.4rpg
    2.2bpg

    Eddy Curry
    13.0ppg
    5.5rpg
    1.3bpg

    Curry has had some big individual games...

    24pts, 10reb, 3blk
    16pts, 7reb, 4blk
    26pts, 9reb, 1blk
    10pts, 9reb, 3blk
    24pts, 8reb, 0blk

    Chandler has being even more impressive with some of the following...

    23pts, 14reb, 3blk
    13pts, 10reb, 2blk
    16pts, 10reb, 1blk
    20pts, 9reb, 2blk
    12pts, 7reb, 6blk (6 blocks!)
    19pts, 22reb, 3blk (almost a 20/20!)
    21pts, 17reb, 7blk (almost a 20/20 with 7 blocks!!)

    Chandler is averaging a double double! Curry is less impressive but is still really starting to show some improvement. Now if we could only sort out the PG problems???

  • XxCiMaxX678
    MVP
    • Oct 2002
    • 1579

    #2
    Re: C&C...Curry and Chandler!

    Yes, I've been pleased with their progress...however, they still need to work on their defense.

    Comment

    • XxCiMaxX678
      MVP
      • Oct 2002
      • 1579

      #3
      Re: C&C...Curry and Chandler!

      Yes, I've been pleased with their progress...however, they still need to work on their defense.

      Comment

      • XxCiMaxX678
        MVP
        • Oct 2002
        • 1579

        #4
        Re: C&C...Curry and Chandler!

        IMO, it should be C&C&C. The 3rd being Jamal Crawford. I was never happy that we drafted J Will, simply because I knew all along that the triangle offense wouldn't suit him. J-Craw has mad handles, and a sweet J.

        Comment

        • XxCiMaxX678
          MVP
          • Oct 2002
          • 1579

          #5
          Re: C&C...Curry and Chandler!

          IMO, it should be C&C&C. The 3rd being Jamal Crawford. I was never happy that we drafted J Will, simply because I knew all along that the triangle offense wouldn't suit him. J-Craw has mad handles, and a sweet J.

          Comment

          • jod23
            Rookie
            • Oct 2002
            • 275

            #6
            Re: C&C...Curry and Chandler!

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            IMO, it should be C&amp;C&amp;C. The 3rd being Jamal Crawford. I was never happy that we drafted J Will, simply because I knew all along that the triangle offense wouldn't suit him. J-Craw has mad handles, and a sweet J.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            IMO we need to scrap the triangle offence and deal Crawford. J-Will is the better PG but he doesnt suit the system. So let's play a more freestyle run and gun game and let the kids run rings around teams. Rather than wasting our number 2 draft pick in a system that hasnt worked since MJ ruled the world.

            Comment

            • jod23
              Rookie
              • Oct 2002
              • 275

              #7
              Re: C&amp;C...Curry and Chandler!

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              IMO, it should be C&amp;C&amp;C. The 3rd being Jamal Crawford. I was never happy that we drafted J Will, simply because I knew all along that the triangle offense wouldn't suit him. J-Craw has mad handles, and a sweet J.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              IMO we need to scrap the triangle offence and deal Crawford. J-Will is the better PG but he doesnt suit the system. So let's play a more freestyle run and gun game and let the kids run rings around teams. Rather than wasting our number 2 draft pick in a system that hasnt worked since MJ ruled the world.

              Comment

              • XxCiMaxX678
                MVP
                • Oct 2002
                • 1579

                #8
                Re: C&amp;C...Curry and Chandler!

                I was saying that in another thread. Although I like J-Craw better, it makes no sense to end up having your #2 pick (J-Will) going to waste.

                Comment

                • XxCiMaxX678
                  MVP
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 1579

                  #9
                  Re: C&amp;C...Curry and Chandler!

                  I was saying that in another thread. Although I like J-Craw better, it makes no sense to end up having your #2 pick (J-Will) going to waste.

                  Comment

                  Working...