All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DTX3
    Hall Of Fame
    • Jun 2003
    • 13022

    #1

    All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

    Seen this article this morning and thought i should post it, they also have the boxscores for each game and you can find it in this link.

    Which is the greater franchise in NBA history, the Lakers or the Celtics? It's East Coast vs. West Coast; 16 championships vs. 14; Hollywood glamour vs. New England grit; victory cigars vs. Showtime; the Garden vs. the Forum; Magic vs. Bird; Russell vs. Wilt; Cousy vs. West; and now, Kobe vs. the Big Ticket, the Truth and Jesus (Shuttlesworth).
    In an attempt to answer the debate, let's first phrase the question a little differently: What if a team of the greatest Lakers players of all-time faced a team of the greatest Celtics players of all-time?

    We've simulated a seven-game series between the two teams 10,000 times. Just as they do this season, the Celtics get home-court advantage in the series due to the edge in championships.



    The Rosters
    We reached out to FOXSports.com NBA contributor Randy Hill to help us assemble the all-time Lakers and Celtics teams. Only stats that a player accumulated while with the Lakers are Celtics are used. We did our best to give adequate playing time to everyone, with preference given to starters and those who played more of their careers with the franchise.

    Clearly, the Lakers are stacked in the paint with four definitive centers. They lack a true small forward and depth at power forward or at point guard behind Magic. Boston has a very strong starting five with some great role players and defensive specialists coming off the bench. Nationally, names like Tommy Heinsohn and Jo Jo White may not be as well known as Michael Cooper and Byron Scott, but they are well-rounded players who know exactly what to do to improve the team.

    In fact, that is probably the biggest common factor among all of the great Celtics squads — that no player is ever really bigger than the team and everyone contributes. Disagree with the rosters? Build your own.

    All-Time Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers:

    Starters: Magic Johnson (PG), Jerry West (SG), Kobe Bryant (SF), Elgin Baylor (PF), Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (C)
    Bench: Gail Goodrich, Michael Cooper, Byron Scott, James Worthy, George Mikan, Shaquille O'Neal, Wilt Chamberlain

    All-Time Boston Celtics:

    Starters: Bob Cousy (PG), John Havlicek (SG), Larry Bird (SF), Kevin McHale (PF), Bill Russell (C)
    Bench: Dennis Johnson, Jo Jo White, Sam Jones, Tommy Heinsohn, Kevin Garnett, Dave Cowens, Robert Parish


    The Results

    According to 10,000 simulations, the greatest franchise of all-time is the Boston Celtics. The Celtics won 61.5 percent of the series. Boston's stellar defense, passing and rebounding at every position leave them without an exploitable weakness. The most common series result is a Boston win in six games (eerily similar to the actual Finals preview).

    What follows is an example series based on the most common result of those simulations. It includes box scores, play-by-play and stats for each game in the series. Click on the links after each brief summary to see the entire breakdown of the game.


    Game 1
    Celtics 108, Lakers 107: The first game in the Garden lives up to its billing and then some. Boston overcomes 13 blocks and 53.8 percent shooting by the Lakers to take Game 1 by just a point. Trailing by two with 11 seconds left in the game, Kevin McHale tosses it back out to Bob Cousy after being doubled on the block. Whether he's ever seen the line at his feet or not, Cousy nails a 3-point jumper from the right wing to put the Celtics ahead. On the final possession of the game, Bill Russell's defense keeps Kareem Abdul-Jabbar away from the hoop, forcing him into a 14-foot miss. John Havlicek leads the team with 26 points in a game the Celtics have no business winning.

    Boxscore with play-by-play


    Game 2
    Celtics 99, Lakers 98: Another one-point nail-biter goes to the Celtics. This time it's well-deserved as Boston shoots 50 percent from the field and holds all Lakers players under 20 points. The Lakers' top scorer in the game, Elgin Baylor, actually has a chance to hit 20 points and win the game with four seconds remaining, but his 8-foot jumper goes awry. Abdul-Jabbar catches the errant shot and tries to throw it up off balance as time expires, but this putback is denied by McHale. Havlicek again leads the victors in scoring with 22 points. Sam Jones' 12 points in 13 minutes provide a great spark off of the bench for the Celtics, while Larry Bird earns Player of the Game honors with 17 points, 11 rebounds, five assists and three steals.

    Boxscore with play-by-play


    Game 3
    Lakers 114, Celtics 110: The Lakers backcourt comes alive and the team shoots 57.1 percent from the field and 91.7 percent from the line as L.A. takes the first game played at the Great Western Forum. After two more balanced and defensively oriented games, the scoring stars come out in Game 3. Larry Bird leads five 20-plus point scorers with 30. Kobe Bryant and Magic Johnson top the Lakers with 24 and 21 points, respectively. The duo combines to shoot an astounding 18-for-25 against a great Celtics defense. The win and offensive output breathes life in this ultimate version of Showtime.

    Boxscore with play-by-play


    Game 4
    Lakers 116, Celtics 112: And just like that, the series is even. Apparently, Boston is only capable of winning by one, while L.A. can only win by four. Six players from both teams score in double figures as Red Auerbach and Pat Riley keep tinkering with the matchups to find something that works against such great players. James Worthy only plays 11 minutes for the Lakers, but his performance may be the most notable of the night. In those 11 minutes, Worthy shoots 7-of-10 for 14 points. Only Jerry West with 18 ends the game with more for L.A. Also notable are Bill Russell's 22 rebounds in the loss. The Celtics do not shoot as well as the Lakers, yet keep it close with 19 second-chance opportunities against the likes of Shaquille O'Neal, Wilt Chamberlain, George Mikan and Abdul-Jabbar.

    Boxscore with play-by-play


    Game 5

    Celtics 110, Lakers 106: "Havlicek steals the ball ... twice!" John Havlicek comes up with two huge steals in the fourth quarter to seal the victory for Boston. The last steal comes with 2:14 remaining with the score tied and Jerry West looking to put L.A ahead since midway through the third quarter. Havlicek takes "Mr. Clutch's" dribble and leads a break that ends in Magic fouling Cousy for two go-ahead free throws. The game that Boston really needed before it headed back home is also Cousy's best game of the series. Mostly quiet for the first four games — outside of a game-winning 3 — the basketball pioneer and innovator scores 23 points to go with six assists and three rebounds. He hits seven straight free throws in the last 12:55 of the game. Who is Mr. Clutch?

    Boxscore with play-by-play


    Game 6
    Celtics 99, Lakers 92: The defensive superiority and depth of the Celtics really shines in this decisive game. All 12 players score for Boston, with Cousy leading the way with 18 points. Eight Celtics grab four rebounds or more, including 10 from the shooting guard Havlicek and nine from Bill Russell. Russell, who only averages 11.2 points a game for the series, has anchored the defense with 14.2 rebounds and 3.7 blocks per contest — including six in Game 6.

    Bird narrowly edges Havlicek and Russell for series MVP honors. Does that mean he is the greatest Celtic of all-time and better than Magic, Wilt, Kobe, West, Kareem, etc.? I'm not sure. But 18.5 points, 7.3 rebounds, 6.2 assists and 1.7 steals per game (37.7 minutes played) on this team and against this competition is very good. Havlicek puts up 18.7 points, 5.8 rebounds and 4.2 assists in 36.8 minutes a game for the series. Previously mentioned role players Heinsohn and White combine for 11.5 points, 4.2 rebounds, 1.7 assists, 0.7 blocks and 0.5 steals in just 24.5 minutes a game.
    Get NBA news, scores, stats, standings & more for your favorite teams and players! All on FoxSports.com.
    XBL: DTX3
    PSN: DTX987
    WII U: DodgerBlue760
  • Lynsanity
    Rookie
    • Mar 2003
    • 462

    #2
    Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

    I sooo don't buy this. If you took each of these players in their primes and put them against each other, I really don't think they have an answer for Kobe's athleticism. He would be Jordanesque. I don't think Cousy could contain Magic. I don't think any of them are physically a match for Shaq.

    More than that, I have watched enough film of the old days to think that even I could have been a pro back them. Poor ball handling, slow movement, limited athletic ability. Different game these days. Better athletes. Heck, Lebron would have been a center back in the days when Boston was winning.

    Comment

    • billmatic
      Treble Complete
      • Nov 2004
      • 7365

      #3
      Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

      Athletically the Lakers kill them, but athletically the 2007 Clippers kill them as well, so it's always tough to try and do matchups like this.

      Comment

      • ZB9
        Hall Of Fame
        • Nov 2004
        • 18387

        #4
        Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

        I would have to go with the Lakers without a doubt...that franchise has the all time best all time team of all time

        Comment

        • Cebby
          Banned
          • Apr 2005
          • 22327

          #5
          Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

          Is this a joke?

          The Lakers have arguably 2 best guards of all time not named Michael, and a big man lineup consisting of Shaq, Wilt, Kareem, and if applicable, Mikan would completely dominate.

          If you look at the history of the 2 teams, an all-time Lakers team would beat an all time Celtics team for the same reason an all time Philly team would beat an all time Chicago or San Antonio team. The Lakers may have a 2 fewer championships, but the spread of the championships greatly works in their favor. The Celtics won all of their championships in a 30 year period, and won 14 of the 16 with 2 different teams. While these teams were the best in the NBA, that doesn't necessarally mean that they're among the best of all time. The Lakers have 4 primary groups of teams to pull from, and if you assume that great players win championships, that means that the Lakers would have 4 groups of great players, while Boston has about 2.5-3. Then combine that with 1.5-2 of the Celtics' 2.5-3 great lineups coming before the mid 70s, while the Lakers take their 80s teams and add in the second best 2 guard of all time and a top 5 center of all time, and it's done.

          If you look at the player matchups, it's not even close.

          Bob Cousy is going to guard Magic? Havlicek on Kobe? I mean, that'd be cute and all, but really? And again, a 4 and 5 rotation of Shaq, Kareem, and Wilt.

          The Celtics are arguably the better franchise, but you can't compare a team made up mostly of 50s and 60s players to Kobe, Magic, and Shaq.

          Plus, if you're counting KG, do the Lakers get Malone and Payton?

          Comment

          • ehh
            Hall Of Fame
            • Mar 2003
            • 28962

            #6
            Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

            Originally posted by The Soldier
            Is this a joke?
            Preach!

            This is idiotic, the starting line up should be...

            Magic
            Kobe
            Baylor
            Wilt
            Shaq

            With the NBA's all-time leading scorer as the 6th man. I honestly don't know if the Celtics would win a game.


            As for the simulation, it hardly mentions Kobe or Shaq, pretty bogus IMO. Seems like the drastically underrate those two.
            "You make your name in the regular season, and your fame in the postseason." - Clyde Frazier

            "Beware of geeks bearing formulas." - Warren Buffet

            Comment

            • Bornindamecca
              Books Nelson Simnation
              • Jul 2007
              • 10919

              #7
              Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

              Yeah this is bogus. The Lakers would blow that squad out, lol. That starting lineup is as good as it gets.
              My Art
              My Tweets

              Comment

              • yvesdereuter
                Banned
                • Jun 2007
                • 1688

                #8
                Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

                Originally posted by Lynsanity
                I sooo don't buy this. If you took each of these players in their primes and put them against each other, I really don't think they have an answer for Kobe's athleticism. He would be Jordanesque. I don't think Cousy could contain Magic. I don't think any of them are physically a match for Shaq.

                More than that, I have watched enough film of the old days to think that even I could have been a pro back them. Poor ball handling, slow movement, limited athletic ability. Different game these days. Better athletes. Heck, Lebron would have been a center back in the days when Boston was winning.
                Hold on. Kobe's shooting % doesnt compare to Jordans even without the handchecking (nor does his actual scoring). Also, anyone who scores 2 pts in the second half of an elimination game, as Kobe did, is not "Jordanesque".

                People are WAY to fast and loose with the Jordan comparisons.

                Comment

                • yvesdereuter
                  Banned
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 1688

                  #9
                  Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

                  Originally posted by The Soldier
                  Is this a joke?

                  The Lakers have arguably 2 best guards of all time not named Michael, and a big man lineup consisting of Shaq, Wilt, Kareem, and if applicable, Mikan would completely dominate.

                  If you look at the history of the 2 teams, an all-time Lakers team would beat an all time Celtics team for the same reason an all time Philly team would beat an all time Chicago or San Antonio team. The Lakers may have a 2 fewer championships, but the spread of the championships greatly works in their favor. The Celtics won all of their championships in a 30 year period, and won 14 of the 16 with 2 different teams. While these teams were the best in the NBA, that doesn't necessarally mean that they're among the best of all time. The Lakers have 4 primary groups of teams to pull from, and if you assume that great players win championships, that means that the Lakers would have 4 groups of great players, while Boston has about 2.5-3. Then combine that with 1.5-2 of the Celtics' 2.5-3 great lineups coming before the mid 70s, while the Lakers take their 80s teams and add in the second best 2 guard of all time and a top 5 center of all time, and it's done.

                  If you look at the player matchups, it's not even close.

                  Bob Cousy is going to guard Magic? Havlicek on Kobe? I mean, that'd be cute and all, but really? And again, a 4 and 5 rotation of Shaq, Kareem, and Wilt.

                  The Celtics are arguably the better franchise, but you can't compare a team made up mostly of 50s and 60s players to Kobe, Magic, and Shaq.

                  Plus, if you're counting KG, do the Lakers get Malone and Payton?
                  Perhaps I just missed it but I didnt see anything about coaching factoring into this. Im guessing if LA was to have their best coach, it would be Phil Jackson. Bostons coach no doubt would be Red Auerbach. Its interesting to consider the coaching when you realize that Auerbach drastically overmatched any coach LA had back in the old days. Phil might be a different story on the other hand. People complain about Phil having great players and he has but its not like Boston had scrubs when Auerbach was winning in Boston. And as a matter of fact the 93-94 season with Chicago should validate Jackson as a coach since the Bulls were a game 7 vs the Knicks away from going to the finals without Jordan.

                  Comment

                  • ZM Punk
                    We Spent Some Money!
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 6260

                    #10
                    Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

                    The Laker's would be bringing out the broom in that series.
                    "The academic support at Ohio State, there is no way you can fail. Even if you're giving minimal effort there is no way you can fail."

                    Adolphus Washington-Ohio State Freshman

                    Comment

                    • DC
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 17996

                      #11
                      Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

                      The Lakers on PAPER SHOULD win.

                      But ask Dirk about how that works
                      Concrete evidence/videos please

                      Comment

                      • amra01
                        Pro
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 688

                        #12
                        Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

                        this was one of my favorite thinks to do with nba2k7 (nba2k8 didn't let us trade legends)create the all star teams. Lakers and Celtics were all 99 I prefered pierce at SG and archibald at PG along Bird mchale russell

                        Comment

                        • Hawaii_Stars
                          MVP
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 4308

                          #13
                          Re: All-time Celtics vs. all-time Lakers: Who would win?

                          The Lakers have the better overall team. They SHOULDN'T have a problem beating the Celtics.

                          Comment

                          Working...