Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

**DONOTDELETE** · 05-11-2003, 05:56 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
aholbert32 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
agree

THe Spurs still could of won the game with hitting free throws, but the refs were horrible

The ESPN crew was joking abotu the home team getting more calls, but in the NBA, the Lakers always get mroe calls.

not to mention taht Shaq never gets called for an offensive fould, he should foul out in the 1st qtr of every game

The Spurs can only hope that having homecourt will push them over the edge and get them past the Lakers

But the Spurs did have a chance and missed free throws and missed clutch shots

<hr /></blockquote>

I am SO SICK of the whining. Did any of yall watch games 1 or 2 of this series? The spurs got plenty of calls and Shaq was called for 5 offensive fouls. How come the refs only become biased when the lakers win?

<hr /></blockquote>

Aaron, it's not CONSISTENT refing. That's why.

Game 1 and game 2 were how it was supposed to be called and LA lost.

That's really HOW IT SHOULD BE.

that is basicially the bottonline

**TheMatrix31** · 05-11-2003, 05:57 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

So game 1 wasnt a fair called game....when the Spurs get all the calls everything is so wrong and everything.....but when the Lakers do the same exact thing, nothing is wrong?

Laker fans are hypocrites.

**TheMatrix31** · 05-11-2003, 05:57 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

So game 1 wasnt a fair called game....when the Spurs get all the calls everything is so wrong and everything.....but when the Lakers do the same exact thing, nothing is wrong?

Laker fans are hypocrites.

**Slip** · 05-11-2003, 05:58 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

Are Laker-haters hypocrites?

**Slip** · 05-11-2003, 05:58 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

Are Laker-haters hypocrites?

**noa999** · 05-11-2003, 05:58 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

Sure, call one game for the Spurs, and call the rest for the Lakers. That should make it seem fair for San Antonio fans, and it should provide a great excuse for defensive Laker fanatics..

**noa999** · 05-11-2003, 05:58 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

Sure, call one game for the Spurs, and call the rest for the Lakers. That should make it seem fair for San Antonio fans, and it should provide a great excuse for defensive Laker fanatics..

**Toss2Moss** · 05-11-2003, 05:58 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />

Aaron, it's not CONSISTENT. That;s why.

Game 1 and game 2 were how it was supposed to be called an LA lost.

That's really HOW IT SHOULD BE.

that is basicially the bottonline

<hr /></blockquote>

Based on who?

**Toss2Moss** · 05-11-2003, 05:58 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />

Aaron, it's not CONSISTENT. That;s why.

Game 1 and game 2 were how it was supposed to be called an LA lost.

That's really HOW IT SHOULD BE.

that is basicially the bottonline

<hr /></blockquote>

Based on who?

**aholbert32** · 05-11-2003, 06:00 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
WallyHopp said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
aholbert32 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
agree

THe Spurs still could of won the game with hitting free throws, but the refs were horrible

The ESPN crew was joking abotu the home team getting more calls, but in the NBA, the Lakers always get mroe calls.

not to mention taht Shaq never gets called for an offensive fould, he should foul out in the 1st qtr of every game

The Spurs can only hope that having homecourt will push them over the edge and get them past the Lakers

But the Spurs did have a chance and missed free throws and missed clutch shots

<hr /></blockquote>

I am SO SICK of the whining. Did any of yall watch games 1 or 2 of this series? The spurs got plenty of calls and Shaq was called for 5 offensive fouls. How come the refs only become biased when the lakers win?

<hr /></blockquote>

Aaron, it's not CONSISTENT. That;s why.

Game 1 and game 2 were how it was supposed to be called an LA lost.

That's really HOW IT SHOULD BE.

that is basicially the bottonline

<hr /></blockquote>

Game 1 was called horribly 21 more FT for the Spurs and the Spurs won
Game 2 The Spurs played well and they won
Game 3The Lakers outshot the Spurs 50% to 41% and they won.
Game 4 was called horribly and the Lakers won.

My question is why do people only complain about officiating after Laker wins. Why werent you guys making these threads after game 1.

**aholbert32** · 05-11-2003, 06:00 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
WallyHopp said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
aholbert32 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
agree

THe Spurs still could of won the game with hitting free throws, but the refs were horrible

The ESPN crew was joking abotu the home team getting more calls, but in the NBA, the Lakers always get mroe calls.

not to mention taht Shaq never gets called for an offensive fould, he should foul out in the 1st qtr of every game

The Spurs can only hope that having homecourt will push them over the edge and get them past the Lakers

But the Spurs did have a chance and missed free throws and missed clutch shots

<hr /></blockquote>

I am SO SICK of the whining. Did any of yall watch games 1 or 2 of this series? The spurs got plenty of calls and Shaq was called for 5 offensive fouls. How come the refs only become biased when the lakers win?

<hr /></blockquote>

Aaron, it's not CONSISTENT. That;s why.

Game 1 and game 2 were how it was supposed to be called an LA lost.

That's really HOW IT SHOULD BE.

that is basicially the bottonline

<hr /></blockquote>

Game 1 was called horribly 21 more FT for the Spurs and the Spurs won
Game 2 The Spurs played well and they won
Game 3The Lakers outshot the Spurs 50% to 41% and they won.
Game 4 was called horribly and the Lakers won.

My question is why do people only complain about officiating after Laker wins. Why werent you guys making these threads after game 1.

**DONOTDELETE** · 05-11-2003, 06:00 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
lakerfan617 said:
It's not the Lakers fault, that the Spurs don't wanna take it to the hoop...

<hr /></blockquote>

it's hard saying that when the refs don't seem to respect the hard work of the penetrating players of the spurs.

many of them went to the hoop, only to be stopped by three guys trying to block and hack them.

Other than that, they tryed.

**DONOTDELETE** · 05-11-2003, 06:00 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
lakerfan617 said:
It's not the Lakers fault, that the Spurs don't wanna take it to the hoop...

<hr /></blockquote>

it's hard saying that when the refs don't seem to respect the hard work of the penetrating players of the spurs.

many of them went to the hoop, only to be stopped by three guys trying to block and hack them.

Other than that, they tryed.

**Bredrin** · 05-11-2003, 06:01 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

the run the lakers made before half time is what made the difference in the game. and that run was sparked by better defense. the ref arguement is real tired. you guys are starting to sound like sac fans and its only game 4

**Bredrin** · 05-11-2003, 06:01 PM

Re: Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

the run the lakers made before half time is what made the difference in the game. and that run was sparked by better defense. the ref arguement is real tired. you guys are starting to sound like sac fans and its only game 4

Refs were bad but the Spurs could of won

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment