Me personally, I have to go with zone defenses.
Now, keep in mind that zone defense does not mean that a team is playing a 2-3, 1-3-1, or any other specific zone.
Just that you do not have to be guarding any body on the floor, thus allowing players to roam, and zone any area. This allows the defense to shade an offensive player without penalty.
This is a far more effective defense, IMO. You have defenders now that are able to crowd the painted area. This also gives the defense a chance to get into better defensive position to help out on any offensive position. Legalizing the zone allows for defenders to get into better position to take charges as well.
You see it in many games where there is a weak offensive player. The defense will leave that guy open just to give help defense where necessary.
With zone defense being illegal, on an ISO, all an offensive player has to do is get by his man if there was no double. If that's accomplished, there is a free lane to the basket lots of the time. Defense appears to always come late.
Now, you see guys having to beat several defenders to get to the rim. You also see teams taking more three pointers than in the past, which I feel is indicative of of teams packing it in more giving more looks to shooters. There is an increased need in players needing to be able to shoot as a skilled offensive player will penetrate, the defense collapses, and the offensive player will kick it out. But a jumper is also valuable to avoid the help defense altogether. Now superstar players have to rely on their teammates even more. We are seeing much more of a team game.
I put myself in the situation and think it would be much tougher to go up against a defense zoning my side as oppose to going one on one with one man to get by.
So what do you think?
Zone defense? Or hand checking?

Comment