2003 NBA Draft, how would you have picked it?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brankles
    Banned
    • May 2003
    • 5113

    #16
    Re: 2003 NBA Draft, how would you have picked it?

    Originally posted by eckoefx
    I have always viewed Kaman as highly overrated, Diaw as nothing more than a role player and Perkins nothing without those other four guys.

    Zaza is legit. Before Horford took a lot of his playing time he was doing pretty decent.
    Zaza was on the Magic and barely played his rookie year. I like Zaza, but I don't see why anyone would take him in the lottery of a re-draft. His best NBA season so far is 12 ppg, 8 rpg, 2.5 topg and 0.5 bpg.

    Two seasons ago Kaman was averaging 16 ppg, 13 rpg, and 3 bpg and on better FG%. In six games this season, Kaveman is averaging 22 and 10.

    Maybe you like Zaza's intangibles? But on paper Kaman is the hands-down choice if you're looking for a C.

    Also, Perkins is one of the top defensive C's in the league and Diaw is one of the most versatile PFs in the league. Zaza is just another serviceable big man, imo.

    Comment

    • danefizzle
      Rookie
      • Oct 2008
      • 54

      #17
      Re: 2003 NBA Draft, how would you have picked it?

      knowing what we know now, i don't see how dwyane wade could fall out of the top 4. no matter what my team's needs are, i'm not passing up on wade for david west.
      dirty30.

      Comment

      Working...