I was watching a Suns vs LA game and the LA commentators said that they would take Fisher over Nash ... lmao ...
On the other hand, I believe that most of us have different meanings to that word ... I mean, TO ME, a superstar is a player with multiple all star appareances that consistently produces and is the most valuable player for his team ... an all star player is someone like Horford, who rightfully made it to the all star game and put good stats ... a franchise type player, instead, is an invaluable player that any team in the league would want him, someone who can make their team better, someone who while with a few nitpicks here and there, you would only trade for another franchise type player (or a TPE
), a product that can increase the team earning$ and status by his sole presence) ...... having said that, a few q´s:
- is C. Paul a Superstar or a franchise type player ?
- how about S. Nash ?
- are D. Rose and T. Evans "scrubs" as they play on borderline bad teams (the best of them just won 41) ?
- how about D. Wilkins a few years back, was he a superstar or a franchise type player ?

Comment