Because no one wants to see pierce vs. lebron.
ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
Because no one wants to see pierce vs. lebron.Originally posted by BlzerLet me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :) -
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ATrillionaire said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
It seems like the NBA and TV is trying to push matchups between stars and Melo/Lebron so im wondering why they arent airing the celtics cavs game. I mean on the bottomline ive seen stuff like this: Orlando at Denver (TMAC vs Carmelo). the one-on-one matchups are clearly being highlighted ala Shaq v Yao, so why not Pierce v Lebron?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
How about because Tmac is better than Pierce !!
How about because Carmelo is better than Lebron!!
How about most people would rather watch the Magic instead of the Celtics!!
How about the fact that the Nuggets are better than the Cavs!!
How about the fact that both games are a waste of tv space, but you have to pick the game that is the least waste of the two!!
How about the fact that the Lakers vs Detroit should be on TV before either!!
How about the fact that the Sixers vs the Spurs is just the better game, period!!
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Your opinion on tmac/pierce and carmelo/lebron doesnt matter becuz the games are on at DIFFERENT TIMES. Also, dont say nobody wants to watch that because the Celtics are one of the NBA's most storied franchises with a fan base much larger than Orlando or Denver.
PS: no Im not kidding, THINK about it....and TMAC isnt much better than Pierce, maybe you should give pierce the respect TMAC has given him in interviews and such.Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ATrillionaire said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
It seems like the NBA and TV is trying to push matchups between stars and Melo/Lebron so im wondering why they arent airing the celtics cavs game. I mean on the bottomline ive seen stuff like this: Orlando at Denver (TMAC vs Carmelo). the one-on-one matchups are clearly being highlighted ala Shaq v Yao, so why not Pierce v Lebron?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
How about because Tmac is better than Pierce !!
How about because Carmelo is better than Lebron!!
How about most people would rather watch the Magic instead of the Celtics!!
How about the fact that the Nuggets are better than the Cavs!!
How about the fact that both games are a waste of tv space, but you have to pick the game that is the least waste of the two!!
How about the fact that the Lakers vs Detroit should be on TV before either!!
How about the fact that the Sixers vs the Spurs is just the better game, period!!
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Your opinion on tmac/pierce and carmelo/lebron doesnt matter becuz the games are on at DIFFERENT TIMES. Also, dont say nobody wants to watch that because the Celtics are one of the NBA's most storied franchises with a fan base much larger than Orlando or Denver.
PS: no Im not kidding, THINK about it....and TMAC isnt much better than Pierce, maybe you should give pierce the respect TMAC has given him in interviews and such.Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ATrillionaire said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
It seems like the NBA and TV is trying to push matchups between stars and Melo/Lebron so im wondering why they arent airing the celtics cavs game. I mean on the bottomline ive seen stuff like this: Orlando at Denver (TMAC vs Carmelo). the one-on-one matchups are clearly being highlighted ala Shaq v Yao, so why not Pierce v Lebron?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
How about because Tmac is better than Pierce !!
How about because Carmelo is better than Lebron!!
How about most people would rather watch the Magic instead of the Celtics!!
How about the fact that the Nuggets are better than the Cavs!!
How about the fact that both games are a waste of tv space, but you have to pick the game that is the least waste of the two!!
How about the fact that the Lakers vs Detroit should be on TV before either!!
How about the fact that the Sixers vs the Spurs is just the better game, period!!
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Your opinion on tmac/pierce and carmelo/lebron doesnt matter becuz the games are on at DIFFERENT TIMES. Also, dont say nobody wants to watch that because the Celtics are one of the NBA's most storied franchises with a fan base much larger than Orlando or Denver.
PS: no Im not kidding, THINK about it....and TMAC isnt much better than Pierce, maybe you should give pierce the respect TMAC has given him in interviews and such.Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
I do give Pierce respect. He's better than Iverson and is the 3rd best two guard in the league IMO. That doesn't mean he's better than Tmac, nor does it mean he's more exciting. Either way, IMO, the Celtics rival the Heat and Utah and thee most boring teams in the history of the NBA's 5 year's past, and maybe longer than that.Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
I do give Pierce respect. He's better than Iverson and is the 3rd best two guard in the league IMO. That doesn't mean he's better than Tmac, nor does it mean he's more exciting. Either way, IMO, the Celtics rival the Heat and Utah and thee most boring teams in the history of the NBA's 5 year's past, and maybe longer than that.Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
I do give Pierce respect. He's better than Iverson and is the 3rd best two guard in the league IMO. That doesn't mean he's better than Tmac, nor does it mean he's more exciting. Either way, IMO, the Celtics rival the Heat and Utah and thee most boring teams in the history of the NBA's 5 year's past, and maybe longer than that.Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ATrillionaire said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
It seems like the NBA and TV is trying to push matchups between stars and Melo/Lebron so im wondering why they arent airing the celtics cavs game. I mean on the bottomline ive seen stuff like this: Orlando at Denver (TMAC vs Carmelo). the one-on-one matchups are clearly being highlighted ala Shaq v Yao, so why not Pierce v Lebron?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
How about because Tmac is better than Pierce !!
How about because Carmelo is better than Lebron!!
How about most people would rather watch the Magic instead of the Celtics!!
How about the fact that the Nuggets are better than the Cavs!!
How about the fact that both games are a waste of tv space, but you have to pick the game that is the least waste of the two!!
How about the fact that the Lakers vs Detroit should be on TV before either!!
How about the fact that the Sixers vs the Spurs is just the better game, period!!
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Your opinion on tmac/pierce and carmelo/lebron doesnt matter becuz the games are on at DIFFERENT TIMES. Also, dont say nobody wants to watch that because the Celtics are one of the NBA's most storied franchises with a fan base much larger than Orlando or Denver.
PS: no Im not kidding, THINK about it....and TMAC isnt much better than Pierce, maybe you should give pierce the respect TMAC has given him in interviews and such.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Nobody cares about their history except for boston fans. Celtics games are boring.Originally posted by BlzerLet me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ATrillionaire said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
It seems like the NBA and TV is trying to push matchups between stars and Melo/Lebron so im wondering why they arent airing the celtics cavs game. I mean on the bottomline ive seen stuff like this: Orlando at Denver (TMAC vs Carmelo). the one-on-one matchups are clearly being highlighted ala Shaq v Yao, so why not Pierce v Lebron?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
How about because Tmac is better than Pierce !!
How about because Carmelo is better than Lebron!!
How about most people would rather watch the Magic instead of the Celtics!!
How about the fact that the Nuggets are better than the Cavs!!
How about the fact that both games are a waste of tv space, but you have to pick the game that is the least waste of the two!!
How about the fact that the Lakers vs Detroit should be on TV before either!!
How about the fact that the Sixers vs the Spurs is just the better game, period!!
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Your opinion on tmac/pierce and carmelo/lebron doesnt matter becuz the games are on at DIFFERENT TIMES. Also, dont say nobody wants to watch that because the Celtics are one of the NBA's most storied franchises with a fan base much larger than Orlando or Denver.
PS: no Im not kidding, THINK about it....and TMAC isnt much better than Pierce, maybe you should give pierce the respect TMAC has given him in interviews and such.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Nobody cares about their history except for boston fans. Celtics games are boring.Originally posted by BlzerLet me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)Comment
-
Re: ESPN Should be airing Celtics - Cavs instead of Spurs-Sixers
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ATrillionaire said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
It seems like the NBA and TV is trying to push matchups between stars and Melo/Lebron so im wondering why they arent airing the celtics cavs game. I mean on the bottomline ive seen stuff like this: Orlando at Denver (TMAC vs Carmelo). the one-on-one matchups are clearly being highlighted ala Shaq v Yao, so why not Pierce v Lebron?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
How about because Tmac is better than Pierce !!
How about because Carmelo is better than Lebron!!
How about most people would rather watch the Magic instead of the Celtics!!
How about the fact that the Nuggets are better than the Cavs!!
How about the fact that both games are a waste of tv space, but you have to pick the game that is the least waste of the two!!
How about the fact that the Lakers vs Detroit should be on TV before either!!
How about the fact that the Sixers vs the Spurs is just the better game, period!!
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Your opinion on tmac/pierce and carmelo/lebron doesnt matter becuz the games are on at DIFFERENT TIMES. Also, dont say nobody wants to watch that because the Celtics are one of the NBA's most storied franchises with a fan base much larger than Orlando or Denver.
PS: no Im not kidding, THINK about it....and TMAC isnt much better than Pierce, maybe you should give pierce the respect TMAC has given him in interviews and such.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Nobody cares about their history except for boston fans. Celtics games are boring.Originally posted by BlzerLet me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)Comment
Comment