Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • texdirtbag
    Banned
    • Jul 2002
    • 1894

    #61
    Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    Slip said:
    Get some interior defense.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    Ft attempts by LA=40
    Ft attempts by Mavs=24

    Points in the paint LA=45
    Points in the paint Dallas-38

    I think what Dallas needs to do is get some refs in their pockets like LA has.

    Comment

    • ATrillionaire
      Pro
      • Aug 2003
      • 839

      #62
      Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

      hack a shaq....... ..........lame

      Comment

      • ATrillionaire
        Pro
        • Aug 2003
        • 839

        #63
        Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

        hack a shaq....... ..........lame

        Comment

        • ATrillionaire
          Pro
          • Aug 2003
          • 839

          #64
          Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

          hack a shaq....... ..........lame

          Comment

          • texdirtbag
            Banned
            • Jul 2002
            • 1894

            #65
            Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            ATrillionaire said:
            hack a shaq....... ..........lame

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

            Comment

            • texdirtbag
              Banned
              • Jul 2002
              • 1894

              #66
              Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              ATrillionaire said:
              hack a shaq....... ..........lame

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

              Comment

              • texdirtbag
                Banned
                • Jul 2002
                • 1894

                #67
                Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                ATrillionaire said:
                hack a shaq....... ..........lame

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

                Comment

                • ATrillionaire
                  Pro
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 839

                  #68
                  Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  texdirtbag said:
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  ATrillionaire said:
                  hack a shaq....... ..........lame

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                  yea, that's because the shaq rule wouldn't allow them to do it after 2:00

                  I bet you agreed with Steve Kerr's assessment on the Jamison traveling call???

                  Comment

                  • ATrillionaire
                    Pro
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 839

                    #69
                    Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    texdirtbag said:
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    ATrillionaire said:
                    hack a shaq....... ..........lame

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                    yea, that's because the shaq rule wouldn't allow them to do it after 2:00

                    I bet you agreed with Steve Kerr's assessment on the Jamison traveling call???

                    Comment

                    • ATrillionaire
                      Pro
                      • Aug 2003
                      • 839

                      #70
                      Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      texdirtbag said:
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      ATrillionaire said:
                      hack a shaq....... ..........lame

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                      yea, that's because the shaq rule wouldn't allow them to do it after 2:00

                      I bet you agreed with Steve Kerr's assessment on the Jamison traveling call???

                      Comment

                      • texdirtbag
                        Banned
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 1894

                        #71
                        Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        ATrillionaire said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        texdirtbag said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        ATrillionaire said:
                        hack a shaq....... ..........lame

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                        yea, that's because the shaq rule wouldn't allow them to do it after 2:00

                        I bet you agreed with Steve Kerr's assessment on the Jamison traveling call???

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        yea, the Shaq rule. That is another example of the NBA catering to the Lakers. They changed the freakin rulebook for them. That rule had only been around, oh i dont know...SINCE THE NBA HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE. Who cares, the rule hurt Shaq and the lakers so they just figured they would change the rule 3 years ago.

                        and no, i disagreed with Kerr. I felt that was traveling by Jamison. I also felt it was traveling by Kobe when he freakin came down with the ball IN HIS HANDS and proceeded to take it back up to the rack (traveling wasnt called in that case, of course)

                        Comment

                        • texdirtbag
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 1894

                          #72
                          Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          ATrillionaire said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          texdirtbag said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          ATrillionaire said:
                          hack a shaq....... ..........lame

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                          yea, that's because the shaq rule wouldn't allow them to do it after 2:00

                          I bet you agreed with Steve Kerr's assessment on the Jamison traveling call???

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          yea, the Shaq rule. That is another example of the NBA catering to the Lakers. They changed the freakin rulebook for them. That rule had only been around, oh i dont know...SINCE THE NBA HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE. Who cares, the rule hurt Shaq and the lakers so they just figured they would change the rule 3 years ago.

                          and no, i disagreed with Kerr. I felt that was traveling by Jamison. I also felt it was traveling by Kobe when he freakin came down with the ball IN HIS HANDS and proceeded to take it back up to the rack (traveling wasnt called in that case, of course)

                          Comment

                          • texdirtbag
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 1894

                            #73
                            Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            ATrillionaire said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            texdirtbag said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            ATrillionaire said:
                            hack a shaq....... ..........lame

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            they intentionally fouled Shaq TWICE

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                            yea, that's because the shaq rule wouldn't allow them to do it after 2:00

                            I bet you agreed with Steve Kerr's assessment on the Jamison traveling call???

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            yea, the Shaq rule. That is another example of the NBA catering to the Lakers. They changed the freakin rulebook for them. That rule had only been around, oh i dont know...SINCE THE NBA HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE. Who cares, the rule hurt Shaq and the lakers so they just figured they would change the rule 3 years ago.

                            and no, i disagreed with Kerr. I felt that was traveling by Jamison. I also felt it was traveling by Kobe when he freakin came down with the ball IN HIS HANDS and proceeded to take it back up to the rack (traveling wasnt called in that case, of course)

                            Comment

                            • Slip
                              MVP
                              • Oct 2002
                              • 1526

                              #74
                              Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                              If Dallas didnt shoot so many damn jump shots they might get to the line more often.

                              Comment

                              • Slip
                                MVP
                                • Oct 2002
                                • 1526

                                #75
                                Re: Lakers vs. Mavs Part II

                                If Dallas didnt shoot so many damn jump shots they might get to the line more often.

                                Comment

                                Working...