2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
LOL, that doesn't prove anyone wrong. Didn't a Laker just have a technical rescinded? That could be said to favoritise the Lakers if you want to use that logicComment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
lol, I'd call JJ a clown in person too. My whole point is not that he should of went at Bynum. The point is if you're gonna talk big like that like you're some ultimate tough guy, Then follow through with everyone and don't flop on the play before that either, that's where the Clown comment comes from. A Term that some people may be familiar with that sums this up for me is..
Spoiler"JJ Barea ain't about that life"
JJ wasn't talking all that crap when he got leveled by Bynum. Where was the mouth then? What a clown
And I'm sure you would call JJ a clown in person, I'd hope so considering he's like 5'6.
Again, Bynum turned straight to the showers after the cheap shot. That and with JJ on the ground, I'm not sure how your comparison makes any sense. Considering that one instance was a playoff game and the other a meaningless regular season game, I'd say the two situations are much different. You should take that into account and not be so black and white.Comment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
lol, I'd call JJ a clown in person too. My whole point is not that he should of went at Bynum. The point is if you're gonna talk big like that like you're some ultimate tough guy, Then follow through with everyone and don't flop on the play before that either, that's where the Clown comment comes from. A Term that some people may be familiar with that sums this up for me is..
Spoiler"JJ Barea ain't about that life"
On nutshotgate, didn't Reggie Evans nail somebody(pause)below the belt in the past and never got suspended for it either? Or was that just for grabbing that area?#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
No because in Ibaka's case it's just obvious it deserves a suspension. If they where sooooo behind the lakers they woudn't even think twice about the opportunity of suspend Ibaka when the Lakers are so desperate for wins.
It's not a game changer but it would have definately helped L.A. who lacks size inside without Pau and Hill.
Keep in mind I'am not saying that suspending Ibaka would have proven the league was helping the Lakers either. It just would havebeen the appropriate decision.Last edited by Vni; 03-05-2013, 03:39 PM.Comment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
This is what you said:
Clearly your story has changed.
And I'm sure you would call JJ a clown in person, I'd hope so considering he's like 5'6.
Again, Bynum turned straight to the showers after the cheap shot. That and with JJ on the ground, I'm not sure how your comparison makes any sense. Considering that one instance was a playoff game and the other a meaningless regular season game, I'd say the two situations are much different. You should take that into account and not be so black and white.
What exactly changed?
I'd Call him a clown if he were 6'6" too.Comment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
How do you expect JJ to talk trash to a guy who is already in the showers? Again obviously JJ, rightfully so, would feel more comfortable talking trash to Ray than Bynum. How is that a difficult concept. If that makes him a clown then so be it, it doesn't make sense though. The two situations were completely different in every way.
Also, the decision not to suspend Ibaka does not prove anything regarding the Lakers. Let's not go there man.Last edited by ex carrabba fan; 03-05-2013, 03:42 PM.Comment
-
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
Why didn't the suspend Ibaka then?
Lol if it was Earl clark who did it you guys be all over the NBA bias right now. But now you give me the 'Ohhh don't go there man' card. Please.
I hear that kind of stuff everyday on theses boards.Comment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
I gather if it were Earl Clark, it'd probably be the same outcome I really can't see how the NBA has a bias for the Thunder and then you say they don't for the Lakers.Comment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
Nobody knows why they didn't suspend Ibaka, but to somehow say "this proves all the people wrong who thought the league favors the Lakers" is ridiculous. I won't even get into it further.Comment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
If they where all over the Lakers they woudn't have thought twice about the opportunity to suspend an OKC's starter. That's just obvious.Comment
-
Re: 2/26 - 3/4 Games Discussion Thread
The thing is, not everything has to revolve around the Lakers. Just because the Lakers happened to be playing the Thunder when Ibaka should have been suspended doesn't prove a darn thing and it doesn't prove that the league favors or doesn't favor anyone. That's so illogical that it doesn't even warrant a discussion.Comment
Comment