Is that right, chris webber?

[jordan0386]

whats this?

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
nkhera1 said:
trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

no

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
nkhera1 said:
trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

no

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
nkhera1 said:
trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

no

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
nkhera1 said:
trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

no

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

yeah think about it, they havn't been doing that well with chris webber, and if they trade him they will probably get some other good player in return, because you have to match the salaries, and if they traded him for scrubs they would have so much cap room. I don't see how this wouldn't be beneficial.

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
nkhera1 said:
trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

no

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

yeah think about it, they havn't been doing that well with chris webber, and if they trade him they will probably get some other good player in return, because you have to match the salaries, and if they traded him for scrubs they would have so much cap room. I don't see how this wouldn't be beneficial.

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
nkhera1 said:
trading webber would actually be beneficial for the kings

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

no

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

yeah think about it, they havn't been doing that well with chris webber, and if they trade him they will probably get some other good player in return, because you have to match the salaries, and if they traded him for scrubs they would have so much cap room. I don't see how this wouldn't be beneficial.

[ksolo12]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

This would be a terrible move unless they get a great power forward in return. I know they have not played well since he has returned, however, the Kings have no chance of winning a championship without Webber. They are already soft with him and would be softer without him. The problem is the Kings have a bunch of players who score and don't play defense yet the scorers are no where to be found in crunch time when the game is on the line. Webber is the only real go to guy late in the game.

[ksolo12]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

This would be a terrible move unless they get a great power forward in return. I know they have not played well since he has returned, however, the Kings have no chance of winning a championship without Webber. They are already soft with him and would be softer without him. The problem is the Kings have a bunch of players who score and don't play defense yet the scorers are no where to be found in crunch time when the game is on the line. Webber is the only real go to guy late in the game.

[ksolo12]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

This would be a terrible move unless they get a great power forward in return. I know they have not played well since he has returned, however, the Kings have no chance of winning a championship without Webber. They are already soft with him and would be softer without him. The problem is the Kings have a bunch of players who score and don't play defense yet the scorers are no where to be found in crunch time when the game is on the line. Webber is the only real go to guy late in the game.

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ksolo12 said:
This would be a terrible move unless they get a great power forward in return. I know they have not played well since he has returned, however, the Kings have no chance of winning a championship without Webber. They are already soft with him and would be softer without him. The problem is the Kings have a bunch of players who score and don't play defense yet the scorers are no where to be found in crunch time when the game is on the line. Webber is the only real go to guy late in the game.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

am i hearing this right he is the only real go to guy. I would trade him for ben wallace and some other player

[nkhera1]

Re: Is that right, chris webber?

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ksolo12 said:
This would be a terrible move unless they get a great power forward in return. I know they have not played well since he has returned, however, the Kings have no chance of winning a championship without Webber. They are already soft with him and would be softer without him. The problem is the Kings have a bunch of players who score and don't play defense yet the scorers are no where to be found in crunch time when the game is on the line. Webber is the only real go to guy late in the game.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

am i hearing this right he is the only real go to guy. I would trade him for ben wallace and some other player