</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Skins4Life said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
not enough said. paul was just out of his rhythm as the whole game had transformed between the time he left the game in the 2nd and when he came back. It went from a tied game to a double-digit deficit. And if you think Artest guarded him one-on-one by himself most of the game, you're kidding yourselves. that stat tells nothing at all about the defensive play of Artest, it just shows misses and makes.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
OK, Im sorry. First you say Boston can beat Indiana. Then you say they wont be swept. Now you are saying Artest had nothing to do with PP bad game. No, Artest didnt guard him one on one. Indina plays team defense as well as anyone, and they are esp. committed to not letting PP put the ball on the floor. So yes, players will be around to pick up PP for when he either A. puts the ball on the floor or B. beats Artest to the hole
Keep telling yourself Artest didnt do anything to PP.. Artest didnt block that PP shot in the third, Artest wasnt draped all over him, Artest wasnt all over the passing lanes.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Dont put words in my mouth. I didnt say Artest had nothing to do with his bad game. I just said you give him too much credit. You cant tell a game from the box score, and that whole post was about how u tried to use one stat to say Artest shut him down.
On another note, It is kind of embarrassing how Carroll is shamelessly pushing for Artest's suspension
Comment