I'm sure this rule wasn't just pulled out of thin air. There must have been some bad brawls that brought this rule to place. Hell, if any team has ever been a victim of this rule, its been the Knicks. I can't count how many times this happened in the playoffs to my boys. At least LJ was smart enough to pick a fight with Alonzo that one time.
Artest suspended for game 2
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
I'm sure this rule wasn't just pulled out of thin air. There must have been some bad brawls that brought this rule to place. Hell, if any team has ever been a victim of this rule, its been the Knicks. I can't count how many times this happened in the playoffs to my boys. At least LJ was smart enough to pick a fight with Alonzo that one time. -
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
Hopefully, Artest will chill the hell out. The Pacers shouldn't complain though. Rules are rules.
I remember this crap happened to the Knicks back in '97 against the Heat, which basically gave the Heat the series. I believe Ewing got suspended for doing coming off the bench.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
Hopefully, Artest will chill the hell out. The Pacers shouldn't complain though. Rules are rules.
I remember this crap happened to the Knicks back in '97 against the Heat, which basically gave the Heat the series. I believe Ewing got suspended for doing coming off the bench.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
Hopefully, Artest will chill the hell out. The Pacers shouldn't complain though. Rules are rules.
I remember this crap happened to the Knicks back in '97 against the Heat, which basically gave the Heat the series. I believe Ewing got suspended for doing coming off the bench.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
They said that Jefferson was still in the vicinity of the bench, while Artest was clearly out of the bench area
Ron Artest ---->Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
They said that Jefferson was still in the vicinity of the bench, while Artest was clearly out of the bench area
Ron Artest ---->Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
They said that Jefferson was still in the vicinity of the bench, while Artest was clearly out of the bench area
Ron Artest ---->Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Dynasty4Kobe said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
They said that Jefferson was still in the vicinity of the bench, while Artest was clearly out of the bench area
Ron Artest ---->
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
So ? His intention was going on the court. Look at it this way.. a criminal goes in a bank w/ the inetion of robbing, but he stops himself.. he is still seen, so he`ll be arrested for attempted robbery.. with that said, Jefferson took steps toward the court, albeit, not as many as Artest.. therefore, both should be suspended for violated the rule.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Dynasty4Kobe said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
They said that Jefferson was still in the vicinity of the bench, while Artest was clearly out of the bench area
Ron Artest ---->
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
So ? His intention was going on the court. Look at it this way.. a criminal goes in a bank w/ the inetion of robbing, but he stops himself.. he is still seen, so he`ll be arrested for attempted robbery.. with that said, Jefferson took steps toward the court, albeit, not as many as Artest.. therefore, both should be suspended for violated the rule.Comment
-
Re: Artest suspended for game 2
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Dynasty4Kobe said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
WalMartisDope said:
Eh.. this is [censored].. yes, a rule is a rule.. but I don`t think Artest was going out there w/ bad intentions.. he said he was going out there to prefent an altercation and make sure tempers didn`t flare.. so, why can`t he go out there and make sure O`Neal doesn`t do anything stupid.. it`s obvious Artest changed for the better.. the NBA just stuck it to himm though.. and it was funny that the Celtics coach, who`s name slips my mind, was pushing for the suspension, knowing his team can`t beat the Pacers.
So, a rule is a rule.. whether you take one step or six.. therefore.. to be air and enforce the rule, Richard Jerfferson should be suspended too.. it doesn`t matter how many steps he took.. he broke the rule.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Agreed. Jefferson should have been suspended if Artest was suspended. They both got off the bench and took steps towards the court.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
They said that Jefferson was still in the vicinity of the bench, while Artest was clearly out of the bench area
Ron Artest ---->
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
So ? His intention was going on the court. Look at it this way.. a criminal goes in a bank w/ the inetion of robbing, but he stops himself.. he is still seen, so he`ll be arrested for attempted robbery.. with that said, Jefferson took steps toward the court, albeit, not as many as Artest.. therefore, both should be suspended for violated the rule.Comment
Comment