2017 Offseason Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JazzMan
    SOLDIER, First Class...
    • Feb 2012
    • 13547

    #796
    Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

    Originally posted by redsox4evur
    I wouldn't be surprised if Danny really is in love with Jackson. And wanted to trade down so he could save the 3 million and change he is going to get by drafting at 3 instead of 1 to sign Heyward this offseason and not have to unload one of the half top 6 guys (Bradley, Crowder, Smarr) to do it. Now we are only something like just over 600K away from having a full max slot available.


    Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
    Sounds good and all, but Hayward ain't going.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
    Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
    PSN: JazzMan_OS

    Green Bay Packers
    Utah Jazz
    Nebraska Cornhuskers

    Dibs: AJ Lee

    Comment

    • illwill10
      Hall Of Fame
      • Mar 2009
      • 19808

      #797
      Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

      They are reporting that the trade has been finalized.
      I like the lineup of Fultz, Covington, Simmons, Saric, Embiid. I rather them try to get a veteran 3&D Shooting guard.
      If it gets done on Monday, it leaves Boston plenty of time to discuss a trade for a star veteran. I dont see the point of stock piling picks if you aren't rebuilding and not trying to trade for a superstar

      Comment

      • ProfessaPackMan
        Bamma
        • Mar 2008
        • 63852

        #798
        Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

        Figured they'd wait til the Draft to announce it.




        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        #RespectTheCulture

        Comment

        • ojandpizza
          Hall Of Fame
          • Apr 2011
          • 29807

          #799
          Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

          So Chicago likely isn't in play at all then?


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • ProfessaPackMan
            Bamma
            • Mar 2008
            • 63852

            #800
            Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

            Per WojGod

            Sixers needed Fultz workout/meeting to complete deal w/ Celtics and, as expected, sides have deal for No. 1 pick. Trade call planned Monday.

            — Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA) June 18, 2017

            Fultz wouldn't have gone into workout with No. 3 without assurance trade was agreed upon. Sides have been locked into deal for 24 hours. https://t.co/IiWBLU8A6z

            — Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA) June 18, 2017

            Lakers had interest in pursuing a deal for No. 1 pick/Fultz, but Sixers ability to potentially deliver 3 FRP's in deal too much to overcome. https://t.co/9aBUwqVMiq

            — Adrian Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA) June 18, 2017

            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            #RespectTheCulture

            Comment

            • NDAlum
              ND
              • Jun 2010
              • 11453

              #801
              Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

              So is it a guarantee Ball to LA now?

              Well it's probably Ball or Fox...
              SOS Madden League (PS4) | League Archives
              SOS Crew Bowl III & VIII Champs

              Atlanta Braves Fantasy Draft Franchise | Google Docs History
              NL East Champs 5x | WS Champion 1x (2020)

              Comment

              • ricky24
                MVP
                • Jan 2014
                • 4888

                #802
                Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                Hard to argue against that haul. Just hope his plan works out.

                Comment

                • King_B_Mack
                  All Star
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 24450

                  #803
                  Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                  Originally posted by ojandpizza
                  So Chicago likely isn't in play at all then?


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                  Not unless the Sixers plan on sending the 1 and some stuff their way or Boston is packaging 3 and something else for Jimmy.

                  Originally posted by NDAlum
                  So is it a guarantee Ball to LA now?

                  Well it's probably Ball or Fox...
                  Would be great if the Lakers took Jackson now to stick it to the Celtics.

                  I'm not understanding Ainge's gameplan here. You got the number 1 you were looking for, so you traded it to move back to 3 to get two protected first round picks, 1 of them coming from a team who is on the upswing with young talent that could help them make a quick leap and could potentially be landing Paul George in a trade this offseason or before the trade deadline next season?

                  Comment

                  • ricky24
                    MVP
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 4888

                    #804
                    Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                    If the lakers take Jackson Celtics probably just take Tatum. Danny obviously doesn't care if he did this now.

                    Comment

                    • King_B_Mack
                      All Star
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 24450

                      #805
                      Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                      Sounds even dumber if you put it that way IMO.

                      Comment

                      • RedSceptile
                        MVP
                        • Jun 2011
                        • 3680

                        #806
                        Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                        Smart move by Boston they already have enough guards as it is and they can end up with Jackson or Tatum for example as well as that future Lakers pick which unless they make a major splash in free agency next year or their guys hit their ceiling like now should still be a sweet pick. It's a risk, but it is a calculated risk as it stands worth jumping on it. Same for Philly, this is a gamble that can either pay off big or end up being another RGIII scenario.

                        Comment

                        • ricky24
                          MVP
                          • Jan 2014
                          • 4888

                          #807
                          Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                          Originally posted by King_B_Mack
                          Sounds even dumber if you put it that way IMO.


                          Well you just said you don't understand the plan. So I get it. There's no way the Celtics take ball if they are not taking Fultz. Obviously Danny is content with whatever he's getting at 3.

                          Comment

                          • King_B_Mack
                            All Star
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 24450

                            #808
                            Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                            Makes it a little better I guess. Kings will likely be trash for the next 150 years at least. Gotta hope that the Lakers pick pans out exactly how they hope. I think Danny might have over thought this thing.

                            Comment

                            • philliesfan136
                              MVP
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 4263

                              #809
                              Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                              Feeling p good right now.
                              Things Wrong With Madden Doc

                              Comment

                              • wco81
                                Banned
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 3305

                                #810
                                Re: 2017 Offseason Thread

                                Originally posted by 23
                                What exactly is the plan on Beantown?
                                Supposedly there are two schools of thought, build for 2018 or build for 2021 and beyond.

                                But if he's going to try to sign Hayward and Griffin, and then he's going to draft Jackson?

                                And he already used a #3 last year on Brown?

                                Guess you can't have enough wings.

                                Comment

                                Working...