Tmac is more versatile then all of those people except for KG thus making him way better in my opinion
Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by SlipWhat do you mean by "not even close"? Like Mark Madsen not even close to KG, or Peja not even close to Ray allen?
Tmac is more versatile then all of those people except for KG thus making him way better in my opinionComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by KDRETruth is the bball boards have been pretty dead. The one's I see complaining about him posting aren't starting any discussion threads. If you agree or disagree with him, tell him why, and leave it at that like a couple of other posters in here did.
Don't jump in attacking a guy contruibuting to the boards. If you dont like his post put him on ignore. For some reason though, you dont you havent done that, maybe because you actually want to see what he says first..
The reason the bball boards are dead are because it becomes a contest between two sides: those who have a hard on for all things kobe vs. those who disagree. I see no reason in explaining to someone why Kobe shouldn't be compared to Ron Artest, just like I dont see a reason to explain why comparing Tim Duncan to Jason Kidd is illogical. I can tell when someone has a hard on for one particular player. No need to feed the beast, if the debate has merit, it will prosper whether I jump in or not.
Debates are one thing, but what this is is something different. If you objectively analyzed every thread rbruns has created you'd come down to two conclusions: rbruns is a big Shaq fan, and rbruns hates Kobe. No need for random threads that will instigate people on both extremes of Kobeism. Make one thread titled "Shaq Rulz, Kobe sux" and have at it. Oh yeah, that's what Kobe's thread has become. Maybe we can confine rbruns to that thread so he can keep it alive. Seriously though, the bball forums wont prosper if people cant call a spade a spade. If enough people see things and continue to call people on the carpet then the overall forum improves. Ignoring doesn't help the forums. If the main thread starter is on everyone who disagrees with them's ignore list than the forum doesn't improve does it?Comment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by KDRETruth is the bball boards have been pretty dead. The one's I see complaining about him posting aren't starting any discussion threads. If you agree or disagree with him, tell him why, and leave it at that like a couple of other posters in here did.
Don't jump in attacking a guy contruibuting to the boards. If you dont like his post put him on ignore. For some reason though, you dont you havent done that, maybe because you actually want to see what he says first..
The reason the bball boards are dead are because it becomes a contest between two sides: those who have a hard on for all things kobe vs. those who disagree. I see no reason in explaining to someone why Kobe shouldn't be compared to Ron Artest, just like I dont see a reason to explain why comparing Tim Duncan to Jason Kidd is illogical. I can tell when someone has a hard on for one particular player. No need to feed the beast, if the debate has merit, it will prosper whether I jump in or not.
Debates are one thing, but what this is is something different. If you objectively analyzed every thread rbruns has created you'd come down to two conclusions: rbruns is a big Shaq fan, and rbruns hates Kobe. No need for random threads that will instigate people on both extremes of Kobeism. Make one thread titled "Shaq Rulz, Kobe sux" and have at it. Oh yeah, that's what Kobe's thread has become. Maybe we can confine rbruns to that thread so he can keep it alive. Seriously though, the bball forums wont prosper if people cant call a spade a spade. If enough people see things and continue to call people on the carpet then the overall forum improves. Ignoring doesn't help the forums. If the main thread starter is on everyone who disagrees with them's ignore list than the forum doesn't improve does it?Comment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by KashanovaPeja is overrated and he cant create for him self on a cosistent termI do because I can, I can because I want, I want because you say I can'tComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by KashanovaPeja is overrated and he cant create for him self on a cosistent termI do because I can, I can because I want, I want because you say I can'tComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by timidFrom your post, its obvious you have never watched a Pacer game. You have no idea what you're talking about.I don't watch Pacer games, but from what little i've seenComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by timidFrom your post, its obvious you have never watched a Pacer game. You have no idea what you're talking about.I don't watch Pacer games, but from what little i've seenComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
I don't need to back it up again. I've already explained to you as have others. Its also been said by others in this thread.
Exactly how do Kobe or McGrady make their teammates better? From what I hear, most analysts and people on this board, don't seem to to think he does. Steve Nash makes his teammates better by getting them the ball in the right spots. Just because Kobe and McGrady avg. a decent number of assists doesnt mean much. When you have the ball as much as they do, you're going to get some assists.Comment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
I don't need to back it up again. I've already explained to you as have others. Its also been said by others in this thread.
Exactly how do Kobe or McGrady make their teammates better? From what I hear, most analysts and people on this board, don't seem to to think he does. Steve Nash makes his teammates better by getting them the ball in the right spots. Just because Kobe and McGrady avg. a decent number of assists doesnt mean much. When you have the ball as much as they do, you're going to get some assists.Comment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by remixThe kings don't rely on the Peja to create for himself, and I have seen him do it when need be. His role a king is to move without the ball and spot up thoughComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by remixThe kings don't rely on the Peja to create for himself, and I have seen him do it when need be. His role a king is to move without the ball and spot up thoughComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by Kashanovaexactly he's a system player thats why i dont consider him to be so goodI do because I can, I can because I want, I want because you say I can'tComment
-
Re: Is Ron Artest as good as Kobe/Tmac?
Originally posted by Kashanovaexactly he's a system player thats why i dont consider him to be so goodI do because I can, I can because I want, I want because you say I can'tComment
Comment