The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigeastbumrush
    My Momma's Son
    • Feb 2003
    • 19245

    #1351
    Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

    What does Melo have to do with this.

    And since when do teams not talk about their own FAs? Did Billy King and Avery Johnson not say that they wanted Deron back every chance they got?

    Clearly they didn't want anything to do with Fields so they said nothing publically about him. They wanted Lin so they let it be known. There's nothing wrong with that. Yes it was probably stupid on Woodson's part but it was a vote of confidence to a kid who would've been coming off the bench if they landed Nash.

    Originally posted by DieHardYankee26
    Why would Lin take less than he can to stay with the team when there's another that's willing to give him more money for it?
    He wouldn't be taking less. Both teams would be paying him the same amount. He would just cost the Knicks more because of the luxury tax.

    Comment

    • NYJetsfan
      Banned
      • Jul 2003
      • 926

      #1352
      Sorry if this has been asked already and I admittedly don't know much about the CBA....can we do a sign and trade with Lin so we at least get something in return?

      Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

      Comment

      • DieHardYankee26
        BING BONG
        • Feb 2008
        • 10178

        #1353
        Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

        Originally posted by bigeastbumrush
        What does Melo have to do with this.

        And since when do teams not talk about their own FAs? Did Billy King and Avery Johnson not say that they wanted Deron back every chance they got?

        Clearly they didn't want anything to do with Fields so they said nothing publically about him. They wanted Lin so they let it be known. There's nothing wrong with that. Yes it was probably stupid on Woodson's part but it was a vote of confidence to a kid who would've been coming off the bench if they landed Nash.



        He wouldn't be taking less. Both teams would be paying him the same amount. He would just cost the Knicks more because of the luxury tax.
        I only brought up Melo because he called the contract "ridiculous", meanwhile the franchise gave up everything for him, gave him a max deal, and have nothing to show for it so far. I love Melo, but he shouldn't have said anything, especially as this guy could be his teammate. Lin is not the only one contributing to the luxury tax, and it's not his fault damn near everyone on the team is overpaid.

        Deron was unrestricted and they knew they could offer him the most money. The decision wasn't in their hands, it was in his. This is the Knicks decision. If they really want Lin, they can have him. And if they were blowing smoke the whole time, it will show because it's their decision.

        I understand the vote of confidence, and I understand Houston upping the contract for a guy they want to really test if the Knicks mean what they say.

        And I meant he would be taking less with the original deal or whatever the Knicks could have offered him.

        And to NYJFan, no we can't. From what I understand we can't do a sign and trade because he's signed an offer sheet.
        Originally posted by G Perico
        If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
        I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
        In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
        The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

        Comment

        • DieHardYankee26
          BING BONG
          • Feb 2008
          • 10178

          #1354
          Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

          I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on Lin and I don't want to beat a dead horse so I'll leave it at this:

          Ian O'Connor:

          Four hours spent on Lin on ESPN 98.7FM boiled down to this: Can't lose 23-year-old asset like this for nothing. Just can't
          He's 23. He makes 5 million the first 2 years. If he's good, we stick with him. If he's terrible, you trade him as an expiring before year 3. I am of the opinion that he gives us the best chance to succeed. I can see why people wouldn't be of that opinion due to a small sample size, but I trust it. I trust Lin's sample size, I trust Woody's sample size. It just doesn't make sense to me to let him go. Felton and Kidd is definitely an improvement over Douglas, but a guard rotation before Shump comes back of Lin, Felton, Kidd, JR is something I really like the sound of. We will see tomorrow night I guess.
          Originally posted by G Perico
          If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
          I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
          In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
          The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

          Comment

          • DieHardYankee26
            BING BONG
            • Feb 2008
            • 10178

            #1355
            Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

            In other news, for Raymond Felton and Kurt Thomas, we gave up both Greeks, a 2016 2nd rounder, and Jeffries.

            Felton's contract is 3 years, 10.5 million.
            Originally posted by G Perico
            If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
            I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
            In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
            The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

            Comment

            • bigeastbumrush
              My Momma's Son
              • Feb 2003
              • 19245

              #1356
              Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

              Saw this:

              Jeremy Lin under D'Antoni (19 games): 20.4 PTS, 45% FG, 8.5 AST, 4.8 TOs ... under Woodson (7 games): 13.3 PTS, 43% FG, 5.4 AST, 3.7 TOs
              If Felton can give the Knicks slightly better than those^ Woodson numbers for $3M/yr...then why not go with the cheaper option. I think Felton is more than capable of doing so.

              And that's not even taking into account what Felton will provide on the defensive end.

              @DieHard...you're not beating a dead horse. I actually appreciate the dialogue. Just debating.

              Comment

              • ehh
                Hall Of Fame
                • Mar 2003
                • 28959

                #1357
                Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                No doubt that the system had a big impact on Lin. Combined that with the fact that by the time Woody took over the opposition had started taking Lin seriously.

                The Heat game, even though Pringles was still at the helm, was pretty ridiculous. Norris Cole and Chalmers' pressure getting to you? Damn.
                "You make your name in the regular season, and your fame in the postseason." - Clyde Frazier

                "Beware of geeks bearing formulas." - Warren Buffet

                Comment

                • DieHardYankee26
                  BING BONG
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 10178

                  #1358
                  Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                  Originally posted by bigeastbumrush
                  Saw this:



                  If Felton can give the Knicks slightly better than those^ Woodson numbers for $3M/yr...then why not go with the cheaper option. I think Felton is more than capable of doing so.

                  And that's not even taking into account what Felton will provide on the defensive end.

                  @DieHard...you're not beating a dead horse. I actually appreciate the dialogue. Just debating.
                  It's one of the reason I like OS. That people can actually have a conversation that doesn't divulge into name calling and resulting in someone being banned . But yeah, I think after a while my Lin hysteria will wear off. I definitely can see that I am remembering him as better than he actually is. Since my last post, I went back and watched bits and pieces of games I had saved on my laptop, and while some of it is great, some of it is very rough. Like the Heat game, he could barely get the ball past half court. And I can definitely see why people would want Raymond Felton over Lin right now.

                  If we're going to win now we don't have time for potential, and we need consistency. And consistently getting 4 turnovers a game from our 3rd option on offense just isn't going to cut it. I do think though that Heat game was an outlier. I mean, didn't they come out before the game and specifically say he's not getting 10 points or something like that? I remember some sort of trash talk.

                  Either way, once I wake up Wednesday morning, I'll be ready to go to war, whether Felton or Lin is the starter. If Felton comes in motivated and doesn't hit us with the Shawn Kemp, he can be what we need, getting the ball to Melo as well as working with STAT in the pick and roll. If Lin gets matched, I'll hope he can get STAT more involved, but that's a hope.

                  On the lineup, what do you guys think it will look like if Lin is/isn't matched?

                  I figure if Lin is matched he'll start with Melo, STAT, and Tyson but I'm not sure about the 2. I've been reading a lot on RGM that he would start with Felton in the backcourt at the 2, and end with Kidd at the 2. But I'm not sure how well Felton at the 2 would work. Would we just have to start JR in that situation, barring an unexpected signing? If he isn't, I guess we would definitely have to start JR.
                  Originally posted by G Perico
                  If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
                  I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
                  In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
                  The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

                  Comment

                  • bigeastbumrush
                    My Momma's Son
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 19245

                    #1359
                    Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                    I hope they have enough money left (whether they match Lin or not) to sign another SG because I simply do not trust JR as a starter. I think he can be a good sixth man, John Starks-type sparkplug.

                    My desire would be to get Ronnie Brewer but after having his $4M team option not picked up by CHI...I don't see him taking a veteran minimum contract.

                    If Mikael Pietrus is out there...I say try to convince him to take it. He made $1.2M last year.

                    Comment

                    • Vast
                      MVP
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 4015

                      #1360
                      Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                      Originally posted by bigeastbumrush
                      Saw this:



                      If Felton can give the Knicks slightly better than those^ Woodson numbers for $3M/yr...then why not go with the cheaper option. I think Felton is more than capable of doing so.

                      And that's not even taking into account what Felton will provide on the defensive end.

                      @DieHard...you're not beating a dead horse. I actually appreciate the dialogue. Just debating.
                      Dont forget that half of those games under Woodson, the Knicks were blowing teams out and Lin was not playing nearly as many minutes. Nor did he have to. And also with Stat and Melo finally back he didn't have to score as many points and carry the team like he did under D'antoni.
                      Last edited by Vast; 07-16-2012, 07:56 PM.
                      "I'm addicted to Video Games, and i chase it with a little OS." -Winston Churchill

                      Comment

                      • bigeastbumrush
                        My Momma's Son
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 19245

                        #1361
                        Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                        Originally posted by Vast
                        Dont forget that half of those games under Woodson, the Knicks were blowing teams out and Lin was not playing nearly as many minutes. Nor did he have to. And also with Stat and Melo finally back he didn't have to score as many points and carry the team like he did under D'antoni.
                        So why was his FG% so low?

                        Comment

                        • djep
                          MVP
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 1128

                          #1362
                          Part of his decline might have just as much to do with the heavy minutes and the bum knee. For a guy who didn't play much last year and almost not at all this past year he was playing some major minutes. Remember, D'Antoni was going to "ride him like Secretariat".

                          I really hope they don't go after Grant Hill. This isn't the Senior Tour.

                          Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

                          Comment

                          • Vast
                            MVP
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 4015

                            #1363
                            Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                            Originally posted by bigeastbumrush
                            So why was his FG% so low?
                            My guess is he started taking more 3pt shots and defenses started clamping down on him. The knee could have had something to do with it as well.
                            "I'm addicted to Video Games, and i chase it with a little OS." -Winston Churchill

                            Comment

                            • Vast
                              MVP
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 4015

                              #1364
                              Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                              Damn man. I really hope they're making the right decision here. The team will be better with him on the roster.
                              "I'm addicted to Video Games, and i chase it with a little OS." -Winston Churchill

                              Comment

                              • bigeastbumrush
                                My Momma's Son
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 19245

                                #1365
                                Re: The 2012 New York Knicks: The Filler Year?

                                Originally posted by Vast
                                Damn man. I really hope they're making the right decision here. The team will be better with him on the roster.
                                Why?

                                10char

                                Comment

                                Working...