You have to respect that.
Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
Happy to see Hopkins get the victory. Hats off to him after that one.Comment
-
Re: Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
We do not need a rematch of this. Let Pascal take on Chad and Hopkins needs to call it a career. There is literally no one left.Follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/complex219Comment
-
Re: Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
Simply amazing. Lot's of warnings, which will provide fodder for those who want to take away from this victory. But honestly, Hopkins landed way too many straight right hand leads with aggression, not just counter-punches, to be denied. I had it 115-113, and I could have seen it 2 points more for Hopkins. Honestly, to echo a previous comment, I can't believe this guy beat Chad Dawson. Big puncher, but very little boxing skill (which may be a bit harsh considering he was in the ring with a fighter who may be THE best defensive boxer in history).
One side comment on advertising: Screw every one of those advertisers with an ad on that mat and screw every boxer who paints some silly .com ad on his back. And while were at it screw whoever couldn't figure out how to neutralize the effect of those ads on slips (I know, only Pascal was slipping, but still). We can recover a crippled spacecraft from the depths of space and save astronauts using the computing power found in a Texas Instruments calculator, but we can't figure out how to put ads on a boxing canvass that aren't slippery? This HAS to be a sign of Armageddon.AdamComment
-
Re: Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
Nope i agree with you as him being the greatest....though i am biased as B Hop has been my favorite fighter for years now. But still last night i don't think I've ever seen him be as aggressive offensively ever.HELLO BROOKYLN.
All Black EverythingComment
-
Re: Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
This actually made the small bylines on CNN's website. Although it was with the inauspicious tag line "Boxer, 46, becomes oldest world champ. Really? Forget for a second that he set the record for being the oldest champ. Hopkins is perhaps one of the top 10-15 boxers of all time. And that's what he rates? "Boxer" WTF? Which then begs the questions: (1) Is CNN this out of touch with boxing? (2) Does CNN think its readers/viewers are that out of touch with boxing?(3) Am I just way too in touch with boxing?AdamComment
-
Re: Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
This actually made the small bylines on CNN's website. Although it was with the inauspicious tag line "Boxer, 46, becomes oldest world champ. Really? Forget for a second that he set the record for being the oldest champ. Hopkins is perhaps one of the top 10-15 boxers of all time. And that's what he rates? "Boxer" WTF? Which then begs the questions: (1) Is CNN this out of touch with boxing? (2) Does CNN think its readers/viewers are that out of touch with boxing?(3) Am I just way too in touch with boxing?Comment
-
Re: Pascal - BHop, who ya got and why?
Hopkins landed so many lead right hands it became silly. Pascal landed some big shots but was never able to follow up quickly. Pascal was just throwing haymakers without any sort of set up moves. Those whiffed punches will just wear a fighter down.
Lol at hopkins making references to roy jones, and basically saying he is doing everything the opposite way at the end of his career post fight with kellerman.Comment
Comment