Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

[thqtank]

I am afraid from everything that I am seeing that we will again be stuck with maxxed out CAFs with extended reach. It's like theres no penalty for it which is part of any balanced game.

[Supreme_Bananas]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

I am afraid from everything that I am seeing that we will again be stuck with maxxed out CAFs with extended reach. It's like theres no penalty for it which is part of any balanced game.

What GPD says sounds promising https://www.reddit.com/r/EASportsUFC...creating_tall/

[xFINISHxHIMx]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

What GPD says sounds promising https://www.reddit.com/r/EASportsUFC...creating_tall/

He didnt say much though lol... Im dying for more infos, DEVs.

[Dave_S]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

For the love of everything I want adjustable reach. I'm fine with being penalized for it.

The caf I made of me has way shorter reach than me.

[GameplayDevUFC]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

Fun fact, I recently discovered when doing some research on reach that Jon Jones has the same reach as Stefan Struve.

How crazy is that?

[Yaari]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

The entire mode is going to rely on what their approach to this will be. Even in the last game, this was always going to be an issue.

[Dave_S]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

Fun fact, I recently discovered when doing some research on reach that Jon Jones has the same reach as Stefan Struve.

How crazy is that?

I'm 6'1 with about 80" reach, rock climbers used to call it positive ape index. I used to get made fun of for it, I'm sure that never happened to bones.

Consequences!

[norml]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

The entire mode is going to rely on what their approach to this will be. Even in the last game, this was always going to be an issue.

If you're talking UT the biggest problem is the lack of stat caps. Picking a certain style should have benefits and drawbacks. Currently any stlye can reach 100 OVR. There also needs to be Perk limits. For UT you should only get 2-3 with a limit of one 5 star Perk.

I would care less about a reach disadvantage if I knew my opponent had to have a weakness. As it is now, there are a ton of 99-100 OVR CAF's out there. It's silly.

[thqtank]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

I'm 6'1 with about 80" reach, rock climbers used to call it positive ape index. I used to get made fun of for it, I'm sure that never happened to bones.

Consequences!

i have foot problems so i dont climb should i try it im 72 years old

[Dave_S]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

i have foot problems so i dont climb should i try it im 72 years old

If you want try top rope climbing indoors. Almost no risk. When I climbed I wore climbing shoes and wedged my feet in crevices. Probably can't do that with bad feet. Also need upper body strength and strong as possible finger grip.

[thqtank]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

If you want try top rope climbing indoors. Almost no risk. When I climbed I wore climbing shoes and wedged my feet in crevices. Probably can't do that with bad feet. Also need upper body strength and strong as possible finger grip.

i have very strong grip i still do 26kg kettlebell snatches

[Dave_S]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

Top rope indoors, should be pretty cheap. I'd just see if indoor climbing place provides someone to belay for you.

[Haz____]

Re: Will there be a consequence to maximizing a CAFs reach

i have foot problems so i dont climb should i try it im 72 years old

Yeah.. I had been thinking this for a while, but this dude is definitely DrinkLime....